Connect with us

Society

Franklin Nwadialo $3.3m fraud: PDP, LP knock APGA for silence on arrested LG chair

Published

on

Earlier this month, online and social media spaces were saturated with the shocking news of the arrest of the Chairman of Ogbaru Local Government Area of Anambra State, Franklin Nwadialo, in the United States.

The reports stated that Nwadialo was arrested upon his arrival at an airport in Texas by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for allegedly running a $3.3m romance scam. He was alleged to have scammed multiple victims online.

Within hours after the report surfaced, Nwadialo’s pictures had circulated widely across various social media platforms such as WhatsApp, Facebook and X.com, thereby gaining both international and local spotlight for the wrong reason.

Just as the scandalous news sent ripples down the digital and mainstream media spaces, there has been palpable silence and anxiety in and around the Anambra State Government House over the unexpected arrest of one of their own in faraway United States, as they have yet to make their position known officially on the matter.

And the seeming silence by the Anambra State Government has elicited reactions from both the opposition camps and civil society groups, who have insisted that the state government must make known its position on the matter.

According to them, the arrest of the LG chair has also tarnished the image of the state governor, Prof. Chukwuma Soludo, and his administration and raised questions about its integrity and recruitment approach, especially as the embattled LG boss was elected under the ruling All Progressives Grand Alliance in the state.

Nwadialo, who was elected the chairman of Ogbaru LGA on September 28 under APGA, was arrested upon his arrival at an airport in Texas by the Federal Bureau of Investigation on November 2, exactly one month after he was sworn-in as Chairman of Ogbaru LG by Governor Soludo.

According to the US Attorney’s Office, Western District of Washington, Nwadialo used various versions of names to defraud his victims of thousands of dollars online on some websites where he allegedly used false images for his profile and typically told the victims that he was in the military and deployed overseas, so he could not meet them in person.

He was slammed a 14-count charge of wire fraud relating to the communications he had with his victims and the wiring of funds from victims to the defendant and his co-schemers.

Wire fraud is an offence punishable by up to 20 years in prison in the US. The implication is that, if found guilty, Nwadialo risks a jail term of up to 20 years.

It, therefore, means that the present government of Soludo would have wounded up by the time the 40-year-old politician would have been released if he eventually found guilty.

In their reactions to the development, top officials of Anambra State Government have continued to feign ignorance over the plight of the LG chairman in the US, as they claimed they were still studying the situation while awaiting the official response from the US authorities, even though the reports have saturated both local and international media spaces.

For instance, while the state Commissioner for Information, Law Mefor, insisted that the embattled local government chairman was not an appointee of the state government, the opposition and civil society groups maintained that the LG chair was part and parcel of the state government having been elected under the ruling party.

 

“You know the local government chairman is not an appointee of the governor. So, it’s not directly our concern. Local government is now autonomous. Our worry is that he is from our state,” Mefor had stated.

“When the authenticity of the report is confirmed, what the law prescribes is what I believe would happen. I am not aware of any legal provision directing the state government to sack him, especially in this era of LG autonomy where the LG chairmen and officials are no longer under direct control of governors as elected LG officials and not appointed transition chairmen as was the case before now.”

As a result of this, there have been reactions and counter reactions from both the state’s ruling party, All Progressives Grand Alliance, members of major opposition parties, including the Peoples Democratic Party, All Progressives Congress and the Labour Party, as well as civil society groups and citizens of the state, who have insisted that the state government cannot continue to turn a blind eye, while governance suffered at the grassroots as a result of incompetence.

The opposition expressed worry that while the LG chair is away in the US, governance is suffering in the communities of Ogbaru LG.

Worthy of note is the fact that most people of Ogbaru, a coastal area, have fled their homes to take shelter at different IDP camps as their houses are currently submerged by flood as a result of the rising water levels from the River Niger.

Before the contentious state LG elections that produced Nwadialo and 20 other LG chairmen, the last election at that level was held in 2014, thereby making it over 10 years that the grassroots lacked democratic governance.

According to the opposition, the embattled chairman’s arrest, coming just one month after his swearing-in, leaves much to be desired about the LG elections.

The Deputy Publicity Secretary, Labour Party, in the state, Mazi Chibuike Okeke, said, “While it is yet unclear the circumstances behind the arrest of the Ogbaru LG chairman and while he still remains a suspect pending investigation, one thing is clear, his arrest has cast disturbing shadows over the APGA-led government and Soludo’s administration.

“And for a state governed by someone who is believed to have zero-tolerance for such acts of criminality and misdemeanour, the news is disheartening, just as it is distasteful. The nature and scale of the allegations leading to Nwadialo’s arrest in the US has tarnished Soludo’s administration’s image and raised questions about its integrity and recruitment approach, especially as all the APGA candidates, who later emerged winners of the 21 LGAs, were almost single-handedly and practically handpicked by the governor.

“It then raises the concern that these people don’t have the interest of the grassroots people at heart as their intention means they have come to siphon the local government funds and further impoverish the people. The question now is: who oversees Ogbaru LG in the absence of the substantive chairman?”

Also reacting to the development in an interview with our correspondent, a PDP chieftain and spokesman, Atiku Abubakar Presidential Campaign (2023), Chibuike Uloka, maintained that the lack of a formal statement from the government reflected poorly on both APGA and Soludo’s administration, hinting at a possible complicity or at least an unwillingness to address the allegations.

He said, “The recent arrest of Nwadialo, the newly-elected Chairman of Ogbaru Local Government, casts a disturbing shadow over the APGA-led government and Prof Chukwuma Soludo’s administration. For a state known for producing global icons who uplift both Anambra State and Nigeria’s image, this news is disheartening.

“While Nwadialo remains a suspect pending investigation, the nature and scale of the allegations leading to his arrest in the US tarnishes Soludo administration’s image and raises questions about its integrity and recruitment approach.

“While we await a conclusive verdict on Nwadialo’s alleged involvement, the silence from Soludo’s administration since the news broke is concerning. This inaction only adds to the perception that the administration may be shielding questionable characters under the guise of governance, contradicting the values of transparency and integrity that should be associated with Professor Soludo’s esteemed reputation.”

 

On his part, the state Publicity Secretary of the APC, Okelo Madukaife, called for the resignation of the embattled LG chair from the US.

“Ogbaru legislature should receive his letter of resignation and examine the content of the criminal charges against him. Details of the particulars of his arrest should be placed before Ogbaru legislature for scrutiny, leading to a proper post-resignation action as he faces his issues in the US. It is not a good advertisement for Anambra State and indeed Nigeria. The state government cannot distance itself from the mess,” he added.

However, while countering the stance of the opposition chieftains, the National Publicity Secretary of APGA, Ejiofor Opara, insisted that the party was not silent on the matter, saying its officials were studying the situation before arriving at a conclusion.

He said, “Actually, we saw it on social media the way every other person did. And APGA as a party is yet to actually sit and study the developing situation and circumstances around it. And when we take an official stand, it will duly be communicated to the media. But as it were, you know that nature abhors vacuum, so, having a replacement for an absentee chairman that is off duty; that is why there is a deputy. So, in his absence, the law doesn’t permit any vacuum, the deputy has assumed the chairman’s responsibilities and fully so too.

“As a party, we frown at any act of fraud or criminality and anything that actually threatens legality, that is why we encourage legal hard work.

“So, if it turns out to be fully established, away from the social media speculations that the LG chair is indicted or possibly convicted for any act of criminality, our constitution permits us to expel such a person from the party. Of course, our constitution cannot go counter to the constitution of the nation or international law.

“The public should be assured that we are studying the situation and they should know that we have a history of standing vehemently against such a criminality, act or any form of misdemeanour from our members. You saw our quick and swift response on the case of the lawmaker who assaulted a Bolt driver, so, if the situation is fully established, we will take our stand.”

Also, the Coordinator, Citizens Rights and Election Monitoring Group, Anambra chapter, Okeke Uzor, slammed the state government for claiming that the embattled LG chair was not an appointee of the state government whereas he is a member of the ruling APGA and was elected under the party on September 28.

Uzor said, “They cannot deny the LG chair, more so, the fact that he is a member of their party. What is playing out confirms our stand that the LG election of September 28 was a charade. It shows that the state electoral commission did not conduct due diligence in the screening of candidates as they were hell-bent on carrying out the scripts written for them by the state governor.

“All other remaining chairmen of the 20 LGs should be scrutinised, there are still characters like Nwadialo among them. This shows that they are not coming to serve the people but coming with the motive to continue to siphon public funds in order to maintain their ostentatious lifestyle.

“The local government as an essential tier of government closer to the grassroots must be in the hands of people of integrity and credibility. As civil society groups, we insist that what is playing out in the US concerning the state LG chair at the moment gives credence to the fact that the current government in Anambra has done little to reassure the Anambra people that it is capable of delivering genuine and morally sound leadership at the local government level, after over 10 years of non-democratic officials at that level.

“It means that those they put forward as elected chairmen cannot uphold the highest standards of ethical conduct, accountability and dedication that reflect governance rooted in service and uprightness to the people. This is unacceptable and our stand remains that the September 28 LG elections remains a charade as no election was held on that day. Our LGAs should not be allowed to continue to suffer in the hands of those who cannot be held accountable to the people.”

Meanwhile, the people of Ogbaru have continually expressed fears about who should be vested with the responsibility of controlling the LG affairs in the absence of the substantive leader.

But the media aide to the National Chairman of APGA, Dr Tony Olisa-Mbeki, assured the people saying there won’t be a vacuum in governance at the LG.

“Regarding local leadership continuity, the law is clear: the legislative arm of Ogbaru LGA is vested with the responsibility to deliberate on the way forward. APGA assures the public that governance will proceed seamlessly, with a decision that reflects both legal guidance and the best interest of Ogbaru LGA. This steadfast commitment to order and lawful governance is at the heart of APGA’s mission, ensuring that the people remain well-represented and served, even in challenging times.

“Soludo consistently preaches accountability, urging leaders to hold themselves to the highest standards of ethical conduct, reflecting his administration’s dedication to governance rooted in service and uprightness.

“The incident concerning the Ogbaru LGA chairman is under legal scrutiny, and while it may prompt questions, APGA’s reputation is built on the collective commitment of its members to serve honestly and responsibly. APGA believes that the strength of its character lies not in isolated instances but in its ongoing dedication to the rule of law and good governance.”

 

Society

Natasha’s reason for her removal as committee chair misleading- Senator

Published

on

By

Chairman of the Senate Committee on Gas, Agom Jarigbe, has clarified that the removal of Kogi Central Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan as Chairperson of the Senate Committee on Local Content had no connection to the siting of Mini LNG Plants in Ajaokuta, Kogi State.

Mr Jarigbe, who represents Cross River North Senatorial District, made the clarification in a statement on Sunday.

“The claim that her role or involvement in the siting of the LNG plants played a part in her replacement is categorically incorrect,” he said.

This clarification follows a claim by the Kogi senator in a telephone interview with Berekete Family, a human rights radio station in Abuja, on Friday.

In the interview, Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan said she was recently removed from the Senate Committee on Local Content due to perceived biases and that some lawmakers suspected she was diverting resources meant for the Niger Delta to the north.

“Just two weeks ago, I was removed from a committee on local content. I was moved from there because some people perceived that I was using that office to divert resources from the Niger Delta to the north, and that was not it,” she said in the interview.

However, Mr Jarigbe, a member of the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) as Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan, refuted these claims, describing them as baseless and misleading.

Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan has been an outspoken lawmaker, particularly in the Senate Committee on Steel Development, where she serves as vice chairperson.

During the 2025 budget defence sessions in January, she actively scrutinised and criticised the Federal Ministry of Steel Development, uncovering fraudulent activities involving ghost contractors and unimplemented projects.

Notably, on 22 January, she raised concerns over a questionable N2 billion project for youth training in metal works. She highlighted discrepancies in the budget and inconsistent implementation.

Her tenure as chairperson of the Senate Committee on Local Content was also marked by rigorous oversight, ensuring accountability from agencies under its jurisdiction.

However, on 4 February, upon resumption of plenary for the year, Senate President Godswill Akpabio reassigned her from the local content committee to the Committee on Diaspora and Non-Governmental Organisations.

Given that the local content committee oversees lucrative oil agencies, many speculate that her reassignment was politically motivated, possibly reacting to her unwavering scrutiny of government projects.

Response to allegation of LNG projects influence

Mr Jarigbe said neither Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan nor the Nigerian Content Development and Monitoring Board (NCDMB) played any role in determining the location of the LNG plants.

He explained that the LNG projects, which are Prime LNG, NGML/Gasnexus LNG, BUA LNG, Highland LNG, and LNG Arete, are private sector-driven initiatives, not federal government projects.

He further emphasised that the decision to site the plants in Ajaokuta was made solely by private investors after considering economic viability, access to gas pipelines, and operational efficiency.

Mr Jarigbe also noted that while Mrs Akpoti-Uduaghan was invited to project engagements, her participation was not different from that of other National Assembly members, and her presence did not equate to influencing the project’s location.

“As chairman of the Senate Committee on Gas, I have received numerous inquiries from concerned Nigerians questioning why Ajaokuta was selected as the site for these Plants.

“Private investors make decisions based on the profitability and sustainability of their investments, not political affiliations or considerations,” he said.

Call for conduct and responsibility among senators

Mr Jarigbe also urged his colleagues to exercise caution in their public remarks, reminding them that parliamentary immunity applies only within the Senate chambers.

He cautioned against defamatory statements and emphasised the need for decorum in legislative conduct.

“There is no protection or immunity outside the chamber, and we must exercise restraint and circumspection in our speeches and actions.

“Our behaviour and words must reflect the dignity and responsibility vested in us by the people of Nigeria. The law does not provide immunity for a Senator who defames anyone,” Mr Jarigbe said.

The senator encouraged adherence to Senate Standing Orders.

He said, “Finally, I urge my distinguished colleagues to review and adhere to the Senate Standing Orders and to conduct ourselves in a manner that upholds the sanctity of the Senate and the high office we hold.”

Continue Reading

Society

Oando Boss, Wale Tinubu Receives Award as Best Investor of the Year

Published

on

By

 

Jubril Adewale Tinubu, oil tycoon and GCE of leading oil and gas firm, OANDO, yesterday shone brilliantly like a well-cut diamond when he received the award for the New Telegraph Investor/Transaction of the Year 2024.

 

The oil guru with three decades of expectational performance in the oil sector was among other prominent Nigerians that went home with honours at the Oriental Hotels, venue of the ceremony.

 

The award, described as well- deserved, was presented to Tinubu for leading his team to successfully completing the acquisition of Agip Oil Company at $783 million.

 

The transaction, which was completed in August 2024, was described my many as a remarkable one the nation’s economy.

 

Tinubu is an intelligent, pragmatic and a genius who strikes when the iron is hottest.

 

Gifted with a knack to spot opportunity ahead of the crowd, Tinubu has in the last 30 years of unbroken entrepreneurial voyage positioned Oando among the best oil and gas company in the world.

He believes Nigeria offers limitless possibilities and opportunities, and holds high, at all times, the banner of hope.

 

Today, the business has not only earned him fame and wealth, but has also contributed in great measures to the economic development of Africa and beyond.

 

Other awardees on the night include Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State won the Governor of the Year 2024; Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State received the Governor of the Year in Projects, while Governor Ahmed Aliyu of Sokoto State won Governor of the Year in Economy

 

 

Others are Governor Sheriff Oborevwori of Delta State; Osun State Governor, Senator Ademola Adeleke; Ekiti State Governor, Biodun Oyebanji; Group Chief Executive Officer of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), Mr Mele Kyari, won the newspaper’s prestigious Man of the Year 2024, while the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Barrister Festus Keyamo (SAN), won Minister of the Year 2024 in Transformative Leadership.

Continue Reading

Society

The weaponization of justice and the injustice faced by Dan Etete – Jeremiah Perekeme 0woupele

Published

on

By

 

In the intricate corridors of global jurisprudence, the scales of justice often tip under the weight of political machinations and economic interests. The case of Dan Etete, Nigeria’s former Minister of Petroleum, epitomizes how legal systems can be manipulated, leading to profound personal and national injustices.

Dan Etete, appointed as Nigeria’s Minister of Petroleum Resources in 1995, played a pivotal role in introducing the marginal oil field regime and indigenous participation in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. His contributions have however been beclouded by the controversy around the controversial OPL 245. This oil block, one of Africa’s richest, became the focus of a protracted legal battle involving major oil companies amid allegations of corruption. Etete’s involvement led to accusations that have marred his reputation and overshadowed his contributions to Nigeria’s oil sector.

In a landmark decision, an Italian court acquitted Eni, Shell, and associated individuals, including Etete, of corruption charges related to OPL 245. The court concluded that there was no case to answer, highlighting the absence of sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. This verdict underscores the complexities inherent in international legal proceedings, where accusations often outpace the evidence required for conviction.

Etete’s ordeal is not isolated. Globally, individuals have faced similar legal battles, where accusations are levied, with years spent in court, only to culminate in acquittals. These cases highlight systemic issues within legal frameworks that allow for the weaponization of justice, often driven by political or economic motivations.

The protracted legal saga of Amanda Knox serves as a poignant illustration of Italy’s judicial labyrinth. Knox, an American student, was accused of the 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher in Perugia. After initial convictions and subsequent acquittals, she was finally exonerated by Italy’s Supreme Court in 2015.

The case highlighted significant issues within the Italian legal system. Issues were raised around the handling of forensic evidence, media interference, and prosecutorial conduct. It also underscored the challenges of ensuring justice in a system where legal procedures can be as complex as the crimes themselves.

In the UK, the case of the Birmingham Six remains a stark reminder of the fallibility of justice systems. Six Irish men were wrongfully convicted in 1975 for pub bombings in Birmingham, based on coerced confessions and questionable forensic evidence. After 16 years of imprisonment, their convictions were quashed in 1991, revealing systemic flaws such as investigative misconduct and the suppression of evidence. This case prompted significant reforms in the UK’s criminal justice system, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent miscarriages of justice.

The term “weaponization of justice” refers to the deliberate manipulation of legal systems to achieve objectives beyond the pursuit of truth and fairness. The weaponization of legal technicalities, whether through coerced confessions, mishandled evidence, or political interference, undermines the foundational principles of justice.

In Dan Etete’s case, the prolonged legal battles, despite eventual acquittal, suggest a misuse of judicial processes, leading to reputational damage. Despite his achievements that merit recognition, and most notably his discharge and acquittal in three jurisdictions – ITALY, UNITED KINGDOM, and Nigeria; he has remained the focal point of smear campaigns.

What does his discharge and acquittal really mean? It means that Dan Etete has been formally cleared of charges in a court of law. This means the court has found him not guilty of the charges brought against him. An acquittal signifies that there was insufficient evidence to prove the person committed the alleged offence, or was proven innocent. This means the accused is released from the legal process and is free to go. If he has been found to have done nothing wrong by the Nigerian Legal system, where the judiciary has come under scrutiny in recent times, is it being insinuated that the course of justice was perverted in those other jurisdictions?

In reflecting upon the Chief Dan Etete cases, it becomes evident that the pursuit of justice requires constant vigilance, systemic introspection, and unwavering commitment to fairness. Just as poverty can be weaponized to perpetuate societal inequities, legal ambiguities when exploited, lead to miscarriages of justice.

Moreover, they erode public trust in legal institutions, deter individuals from public service, and can have economic repercussions, especially in sectors as vital as oil and gas. Furthermore, they highlight the need for reforms to prevent the misuse of legal systems and to ensure that justice is truly blind.

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) often find themselves under intense scrutiny due to their influential positions, making them susceptible to allegations of corruption. In several instances, PEPs have been wrongfully accused and, despite subsequent exoneration, have suffered significant reputational damage due to smear campaigns. Here are five notable cases from different countries:

Former President John Dramani Mahama was implicated in a bribery scandal involving Airbus SE, with allegations suggesting his involvement through his brother, Samuel Adam Mahama. These claims, lacking substantial evidence, were perceived as politically motivated to tarnish Mahama’s reputation and divert attention from governmental shortcomings. The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) eventually exonerated Mahama, but the smear campaign had already inflicted damage on his public image.

Adolphus Wabara, former President of the Nigerian Senate, faced allegations in 2005 of accepting a ₦55 million bribe to influence budget approvals. Despite his resignation and a prolonged 14-year legal battle, Wabara was acquitted in 2019 due to insufficient evidence.

Frederick Chiluba, Zambia’s second President, faced allegations of embezzling public funds after his tenure ended in 2002. Following a protracted legal process, Chiluba was acquitted of all charges in 2009. The court determined that the prosecution failed to provide compelling evidence linking him to the alleged crimes. This verdict underscored the challenges in distinguishing between political vendettas and genuine anti-corruption efforts.

Georgia Thompson, a Wisconsin state employee, was convicted in 2006 on federal corruption charges, accused of steering a state contract for political reasons. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned her conviction in 2007, citing a lack of evidence.

Former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia was accused of misusing funds related to the Zia Charitable Trust, leading to her conviction and imprisonment in 2018. In November 2024, the Supreme Court of Bangladesh acquitted Zia and all co-accused, citing a lack of credible evidence.

Nabil Sayadi, director of the European branch of the Global Relief Foundation, was accused of transferring funds to an Al-Qaeda financier, leading to his inclusion on international watch-lists and the freezing of his assets. In 2006, Belgian judges exonerated Sayadi, citing a lack of evidence linking him to terrorist activities.

These cases highlight the profound impact that unfounded corruption allegations and smear campaigns can have on PEPs, often resulting in lasting reputational harm even after legal exoneration.While many accusations are substantiated, there are notable instances where PEPs have been wrongfully accused and subsequently exonerated by the legal system.

Chief Dan Etete’s experience, like the ones already referenced, serves as a stark reminder of the potential for justice systems to be weaponized. It calls for introspection and reform to safeguard the principles of fairness and equity, ensuring that individuals are protected from undue legal persecutions driven by interests that have little to do with justice. This underscores the necessity for robust legal frameworks that ensure due process, protect individuals from politically motivated accusations, and uphold the integrity of judicial systems worldwide.

*** Jeremiah Perekeme Owoupele is a Niger Delta based lawyer.

Continue Reading

Trending