Connect with us

News and Report

Heritage Bank Crisis Deepens…. As depositors struggle to withdraw their money! …….. Bank Unable to pay depositors’ Funds!

Published

on

 

 

 

The fortunes of the once bubbling Heritage Bank have continued to sink deeper and deeper, gradually moving from a state of comatose to a complete death situation with customers’ deposits on the line if nothing is done immediately by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) to salvage the situation, THE WITNESS reports.

 

Founded with a unique philosophy to create, preserve and transfer wealth to its customers, today, the reverse is the case as the lender has continued to create, preserve and transfer anguish, pain and poverty to its depositors nationwide.

 

The bank was established in 2012 and began operations with a sweet story of hard work and determination emerging from a business combination of Heritage Banking Company Limited (HBCL) and Enterprise Bank Limited (EBL) after the acquisition of Societe Generale of Nigeria’s (SGBN) license by IEI Investment Ltd from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). IEI Investment Limited is owned by Mr. Ifie Sekibo, the pioneer managing director cum chief executive officer of the bank.

 

The sweet story continued as Heritage Bank returned 100 per cent of existing SGBN account holders’ funds which were frozen at the closure of the SGBN. This move brought a lot of smiles to the faces of former account holders and inspired many of them to open new accounts with Heritage Bank. In October 2014, Heritage Banking Company Ltd successfully met the requirements of the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) and the CBN toward owning 100% shares in Enterprise Bank Ltd.

 

SGBN, which was incorporated in December 1976 and commenced full banking operations in August 1977, pioneered the introduction of e-banking services including its flagship, the 24/7 Cashpoint through the Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) in 1990. Heritage Bank, however, continued with this legacy as the bank invested heavily on technology and in a few years, the lender rose to become one of the leading financial service providers in the country.

 

Despite finding itself in a fiercely competitive banking environment, the bank remained resilient, navigating through and was steadily rising to compete with the bigger Deposit Money Banks (DMBs) in the country.

 

Heritage Bank, however, ran into troubled waters in 2016 when the anti-graft agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) raised its hammer against the lender following a series of alleged fraud and money laundering cases.

 

For instance, in one of those major cases, a Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos had ordered the final forfeiture of the sums of N1,260,000,000, $327,132.35, £167.85 and €157.90 which were allegedly hidden in the bank. The order came following an ex parte application filed by the EFCC, against Heritage Bank and Secure Electronics Technology Limited. The funds were discovered, following an intelligence report received by the commission, and investigations which revealed no owner to the funds. In an affidavit in support of the application, EFCC stated that Heritage Bank did not provide any legitimate explanation for the monies and “consequently returned the said money through 16 separate bank drafts issued in favour of the EFCC Recovered Funds Account.”

 

Just immediately after this, in 2019, the bank again found itself battling with corporate governance and operational stability/sustainability issues, prominent of which included, but not limited to the acquisition of Enterprise Bank – a transaction that turned out to be a major strategic error – and non-performing loans (NPLs) portfolio, which was at the time, amongst the most challenged in the industry.

 

At the acquisition of Enterprise Bank, Heritage bought some outstanding loans over. Some influential personalities who had secured loans from the defunct Enterprise Bank however refused to pay back the facilities.

 

These and other impending factors however placed the bank on a slow pace, making it navigate steadily while setting up approaches to surmount its many challenges and return to its old glory.

 

From a rising profile and astrological growth, Heritage Bank’s shining light has however begun to dim and dim almost crossing the redline except something drastic is done by the CBN to rescue it.

 

It is however shocking that at a time the bank is in dire need of capitalization, the current managing director and chief executive of the bank, Mr. Akinola George-Taylor and some board members are entangled a boardroom tussle for the soul of the lender, compounding the bank’s many challenges.

 

Recall, that THE WITNESS had exclusively reported that the tussle which had led to the sack of several officials of the bank by Mr. George-Taylor was allegedly in a bid by a top shareholder of the bank to solely take over the lender and get rid of the owners.

 

Another report by an online newspaper (not THE WITNESS) suggested that the bank’s head of IT had absconded with a whopping N49 billion of depositors’ funds without trace. Although the lender had in a statement dismissed the news as “wrong and defamatory,” our investigations revealed that the situation in the bank has degenerated as some of its customers informed THE WITNESS that they have been unable to access their funds.

 

Fresh findings by THE WITNESS show that the bank’s bankruptcy issues, and inability to meet obligations to depositors have worsened and grown from bad to worse since Mr. George-Taylor assumed office as the bank’s head honcho in September 2022.

 

A visit by our correspondents to most of the bank’s branches in Lagos, Abuja, Ogun, Port Harcourt, Enugu and Benin City, shows that the entire system and activities of the bank has been completely shut down.

 

“Do you know that it’s so bad that they could not pay me a paltry sum of N50, 000 at the counter. I have been to branches on Victoria Island, Marina, Idumota, they said they don’t have cash to pay. I even asked my staff who lives on the Mainland to check their branches on Allen Avenue and at Adeniyi Jones, it’s the same story of no cash. My business is crumbling because I couldn’t access my funds in the bank. Their ATM machines have been shut down for months. Is it not time for the CBN to take over the bank and give us our money?” a frustrated customer of the bank, identified as Dabiri Adekunle told our correspondent during a visit to the bank’s branch located at Plot 115, Adeola Odeku Street, Victoria Island Lagos.

 

Some of the affected customers have, however, taken their pains to the social media even as the CBN keeps mute over the situation.

 

The bank is now a ticking time bomb waiting to explode.

 

Some depositors took the battle to the Facebook page of the bank, https://web.facebook.com/HeritageBankPlc to narrate their ordeal.

 

 

Experts accuse Emefiele of politics, ask new CBN chief take immediate action…..

 

 

Meanwhile, financial analysts and stakeholders have tackled the CBN under the suspended governor, Mr. Godwin Emefiele for refusing to take action over the distressed state of the bank.

 

Some of the analysts who spoke to THE WITNESS accused Emefiele of playing politics at the expense of depositors’ sweat in the bank despite seeing the risk and not wielding its hammer on the bank despite its troubled and distressed state.

 

They however urged the new CBN chief to take immediate action by nationalizing the bank like others in the past to save it from complete collapse even as the lender crosses the redline.

 

Mr Henry Effiong, an economic analyst, told THE WITNESS that the CBN needed to take a closer look, considering that the bank is not listed on the capital market which would have enabled public scrutiny.

 

“I believe Heritage Bank is getting away with its underperformance because it is not listed on the capital market and not open to public scrutiny. The CBN needs to set up its oversight functions over these banks, especially those not listed on the exchange,” he asserted. But from what we can see, Heritage Bank is in dire need of re-capitalization and if the owners cannot step up on its task, the apex bank should rise to its responsibility by withdrawing its license and resurrecting the institution from complete collapse.

 

“I think the suspended governor of the CBN, Godwin Emefiele has some questions to answer about the state of Heritage Bank. He might have been involved in some kind of politics because why should he leave to degenerate to this state and pretend that all is well?

 

“The new Acting Governor of the CBN should immediately set up a committee to review the state of Heritage Bank and if necessary, revoke its license and restructure the bank to stay afloat,”

 

Making a similar case, Mr. Kayode Olorunfemi, a capital market expert noted that the quality of services Nigerian banks offer their customers are nothing to be desired, especially those not listed on the stock market.

 

“The major culprits are banks that are not listed on the stock exchange like Heritage Bank,” he said.

 

He explained further that, “when a bank’s leadership and corporate governance policies are zero, it will surely fail. This is the story of Heritage Bank.

 

“I think so many things are wrong with the bank and surprisingly, the CBN has feigned ignorance. The CBN needs to look into these banks to protect depositor’s funds, especially at this time that the economy is seriously challenged.

 

“It must take seriously the series of customers’ complaints against Heritage Bank and other banks that are not on the stock market.”

 

“We cannot afford to witness another drama in the banking sector like the 2009 crisis. It’s obvious Heritage Bank has failed the stress test,” he concluded.

 

Ozenna Utulu, the head of Corporate Communications of Heritage Bank did not respond to THE WITNESS calls placed to her mobile line for the bank’s position as at press time.

 

 

Source: The Witness.

 

News and Report

Alleged 76bn, $31.5m Fraud: EFCC Arraigns Ex AMCON MD, Ahmed Kuru, Four Others in Lagos

Published

on

By

 

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, 20 January, 2025 arraigned a former Managing Director of Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria AMCON, Ahmed Kuru and four others for allegedly defrauding Arik Airline N76 billion and $31.5 million, respectively.

 

Other defendants are former Receiver Manager of Arik Airline Ltd, Kamilu Omokide, Chief Executive Officer of the airline, Captain Roy Ilegbodu, and Super Bravo Ltd and Union Bank PLC.

 

The defendants were arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos on a six-count charge bordering on theft, abuse of office and stealing by dishonestly taking the property of another.

 

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to all the six-count charges when they were read to them.

 

Count one reads: “That you, Union Bank Nigeria Plc, sometime in 2011 or thereabouts, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, with the intention of causing and/or inducing unwarranted sale of Arik Air loans and bank guarantees with Union Bank, made false statements to the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), regarding Arik Air Limited’s performing loans, following which you transferred a bogus figure of N71,000,000,000.00 (Seventy-One Billion Naira) to AMCON.”

 

Count two reads: “That you, Ahmed Lawal Kuru, Kamilu Alaba Omokide as Receiver Manager of Arik Air Limited, and Captain Roy Ilegbodu, Chief Executive Officer of Arik Air Limited in Receivership, sometime in 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, fraudulently converted to the use of NG Eagle Limited the total sum of N4,900,000,000.00 (Four Billion Nine Hundred Million Naira only), property of Arik Air Limited”.

 

Count five reads: “That you, Kamilu Alaba Omokide, Ahmed Lawal Kuru and Capt. Roy Ilegbodu, on the 12th day of February, 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, being public officers, directed to be done in abuse of the authority of your office and with intention of obtaining undue advantage for yourself and cronies an arbitrary act, to wit: intentionally authorizing the tear down and destruction of 5N-JEA with Serial No. 15058 valued at $31.5million (Thirty One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars), an arbitrary act, which act is prejudicial to the economic stability of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Arik Air Limited”.

 

The counsel to the first and third defendants, Prof Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, informed the court of a motion for bail application dated November 28, 2024 and November 29, 2024 for the two defendants.

 

Osipitan prayed the court that the defendants be granted bail on liberal terms.  According to him, the first defendant had no criminal records and that the EFCC granted him administration bail  which he didn’t jump.  “We pray the court grants bail to the two defendants on the same liberal terms given to them by EFCC,” he said.

 

EFCC Counsel, Wahab Shittu SAN, filed counter-affidavits dated December 2, 2024 against the first defendant and also another counter affidavits dated December 22, 2024 against the third defendant.  Shittu prayed the court to dismiss their bail applications.

 

According to him, the two defendants are facing serious offences of economic sabotage. However, he agreed with the second and third defence counsel that they are presumed innocent pending the determination of the court. Shittu , however, added that the temptation of the defendants leaving the country was very high. He thereafter prayed that accelerated hearing be granted and the defendants’ international passports be seized by the court.

 

“But if my lord decides to be magnanimous to grant them bail, we shall be praying for stringent conditions because we are particular about their attendance in court. “We urge that they should submit their international passports with the court in order to ensure that they come for trial,” he said.

 

The counsel to the second defendant, Olasupo Shasore, SAN in his motion for bail dated December 6, 2024 and filed on the same day, urged the court to also grant bail to his client on self recognition.

 

The prosecuting counsel in his counter affidavits dated January 17, 2025, opposed the bail application of the second defendant.

 

He said the application for bail was incompetent and should be struck out. Shittu cited relevance laws to buttress his argument. “My lord, the record of this court is to the effect that the second defendant, at one point, absconded in which your lordship had to issue a bench warrant. “The learned silk for the second defendant is not the defendant on trial and it is very unhealthy for a counsel to stand as a surety for a defendant.

 

“I urge my lord, in exercising his discretion, to take all this into consideration because our concern is the appearance of the second defendant in court so that he does not abscond.”

 

After listening to the arguments from all the parties, Justice Dada granted bail to the defendants in the sum of N20 million Naira each with two sureties in like sum.   The sureties must be gainfully employed and deposed to means of identification.

 

She also directed that the defendants must submit their international passports with the registrar of the court.

 

Justice Dada adjourned the matter till March 17, 18, and 19, 2025 for commencement of trial.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

Trending