Connect with us

News and Report

How Dapo Abiola’s Voltac Global Capital allegedly defraud investors of N1.8bn

Published

on

Voltac Global Capital (VGC), a finance and asset management company owned by businessman, Dapo Abiola, has been accused of defrauding investors to the tune of N1.8 billion.

Following its establishment in May 2020, Voltac Global Capital kicked off operations with packages and offers that were eagerly embraced by investors.

According to a report by Foundation For Investigative Journalism, the company promised a monthly ROI of 20 percent on all investments and kept its word, promptly making agreed payments to its customers for the first nine months after its creation. But things would crumble soon.

Baliqees, an undergraduate student at the University of Ibadan, was initiated into VGC’s investment by a colleague who doubled as the company’s business representative in September 2020.

“When he announced the company’s offer to me, he said the return on investment would be 20 percent and it would be paid monthly,” she said.

“As a final year student who needed all the financial support I could get back then, I decided to invest N100,000. After a month, I got a return of N120,000, which means that the 20 percent promised was actually paid.”

Impressed by their first deal, Baliqees reinvested both capital and profit. She added money as well.

“By December 2020, I had raised my equity to N500,000, and when I added it to the ROI that the investment had generated, my money had become N600,000. In January 2021, I decided to add N200,000, which meant that I would have a total investment of N800,000,” explained Baliqees.

She further disclosed that agents who acted as account officers for VGC were also assigned to each investor, and they would regularly visit to give a breakdown of how investments were fairing.

“During this period, the total sum I was supposed to have with VGC was N960,000. Unfortunately, it was then that they stopped paying their investors, finding all sorts of excuses and stories all the time,” Baliqees lamented.

On March 5, VGC sent a memo to investors, informing them that it would start paying ROIs in April, citing CBN regulations, which included an audit and compliance exercise, as reasons.

Three days later, Abiola, the company’s CEO appeared in a video, apologising to investors for any inconveniences caused by an ongoing audit, assuring them that the company was in a good shape.

His words: “VGC still stands, we are not going anywhere.”

He also told the investors to stay calm, and that their money was safe.

However, on March 31, the company released another memo. In it, it claimed that the federal government’s ban on crypto-currency affected the majority of its funds in February and that the ban led to panic withdrawal by investors.

VGC declared that, while trying to make up for the panic withdrawals being experienced, Joshua Kayode, the founder of Quintessential Investment Company, who had traded with a major share of the VGC’s investment, had failed to remit the required amount of $4 million.

It also stated that Kayode’s activities had forced the VGC to invite the EFCC to conduct an appropriate investigation. In the same memo, the company said some investors had obtained a court order to freeze the company’s account, and that the action had prevented the company from carrying out any transaction.

For the first time, the company disclosed that it had recorded a huge financial loss.

Aminat, another affected investor and student, said she only got N36,000 from VGC after investing N360,000.

“My last investment with the company was N360,000, and when the crisis started in June, the company said it would start paying 10 percent of the total money owed every investor. Those with capital in excess of one million naira were to be paid seven and a half percent,’ she said.

“That’s how I received N36,000 of the total amount due. I had also invited a cousin who invested N200,000. During this period, he was paid N20,000. But since then, nothing concrete has been heard from them. At one point, we learned that their accounts had been frozen because of a court order.

“We just don’t know what else to do right now. We are in a very difficult economic situation and we need our funds to meet our pressing needs,” he said.

“I do not have the exact figure, but I am sure hundreds of investors are currently affected by this, and several million naira is involved. The most annoying part was that the company knew all along that it was in crisis, but the owner kept giving false assurances.”

Following the March 31 memo, Abiola released three more videos and continued to assure investors that the crisis would soon be over and things would return to normal. VGC also continued to email its clients, explaining the steps taken to ensure they received their money.

In a July 7 memo, VGC described itself as a victim of Kayode’s payment default, pleading that any investor willing to assist in the recovery of its funds with the trader should come forward.

In its last memo released on September 2, the company stated that Kayode had been charged to court and that the Force Criminal Investigation and Intelligence Department (FCIID), Alagbon, was handling the matter.

More importantly, the company stated that it had exhausted all means of making additional payments to affected investors because it currently lacked any form of financial capacity. It also revealed that it would lay off a portion of its staff due to the financial crisis.

“Since September 2, we have had no news from the company,” said Baliqees. “It might mean our money is gone. They had promised in the past that we might get our capital back. But right now, that’s not even sure anymore.”

FIJ learned that Kayode had secured the sum of N1.8 billion from the VGC, promising to return enough money for the business to keep its promise of 20 percent ROI.

Kayode has a history of fraud. FIJ learnt that he once posed as an investment expert to defraud 170 persons of N10.7 billion.

A customer service representative at VGC’s Gbagada office told FIJ the company is currently taking a number of steps to make sure investors are paid.

“As you know, the company is into real estate, automobiles, and other businesses. Soon all of these challenges will be over,” she said.

“There is absolutely no cause for alarm. Investors’ ROI, however, is not promised. They can only get their capital back. What I will not be able to tell you is when exactly the payments will be made.”

September 2 Memo

However, she declined to release Abiola’s telephone number. (THE WITNESS)

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Abuja-Lagos Super Highway Project faces threat as two consortiums engage in battle for FG’s nod

Published

on

By

AEC Unity Network Limited, the officially recognised concessionaire for the Abuja-Lagos Super Highway and High-Speed Train projects, has denied any association with an entity known as AEC-Geofocus Consortium (Geofocus).

AEC Unity Network clarified that Geofocus has no role in the planning, financing, construction, or operation of the 470-kilometer superhighway and high-speed rail projects, which are part of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope agenda to boost national infrastructure.

In a statement released on Sunday, the company emphasised that it is the sole concessionaire authorized by the Federal Government of Nigeria, having received approvals from the Federal Ministry of Works, the Federal Ministry of Finance, and the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC).

Barrister Ayodeji Ademola, legal consultant for AEC Unity Network, said in the statement that AEC-Geofocus has no basis whatsoever to make any claim in relation to the Super Highway project, having not been part of its conception from the onset.

In the statement, AEC Unity Network reaffirmed that it is the sole concessionaire authorised by the Federal Government of Nigeria to design, finance, construct, operate, and maintain the 470-kilometer superhighway and high-speed rail linking Abuja and Lagos.

According to the statement, the company’s approvals are from the Federal Ministry of Works, the Federal Ministry of Finance, and the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC).

The reaction by the AEC Unity Network may have been informed by media publications credited to one Engineer Mutiu Yinka Idris, who asserted that AEC-Geofocus was in charge of the project for the federal government.

Idris, who claimed to be Director of Operations for AEC-Geofocus, had in the publication described the company as a consortium of engineers, planners, and investors that had successfully attracted $16 billion from Middle Eastern investors, with additional interest from European financial institutions and the World Bank.

He had also claimed that the financial framework was designed to minimize government expenditure, safeguard public funds, and prevent cost overruns through an efficient risk-sharing mechanism.

Idris had assured stakeholders of a grand project flag-off before February 2025, reiterating AEC-Geofocus’ commitment to delivering world-class infrastructure.

“The $16 billion project will be led by AEC-Geofocus, a consortium of engineers, planners, and investors, and plans have been concluded to commence it by February this year, 2025,” Idris had asserted.

He said that the Lagos-Abuja corridor, spanning approximately 500 kilometers, will connect Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Kwara, Kogi, and Niger states before reaching Abuja, under a design, Build, Finance, Operate, and Maintain (DBFOM) model.

But in its sharp reaction, AEC Unity Network expressed surprise at the emergence of AEC-Geofocus out of the blue to make claims on a project it was never part of.

Part of the statement read: “We emphatically state that AEC Unity Network Limited has no relationship whatsoever with AEC-Geofocus Consortium or Geofocus. Any claims made by Geofocus regarding involvement in the projects are ‘spurious and false.’”

“We categorically state that AEC Unity Network Limited has no relationship whatsoever with Engineer Mutiu Yinka Idris or Geofocus.”

“These fraudulent claims are completely at variance with our proposed infrastructure plans and are intended to confuse and defraud unsuspecting stakeholders,” the statement added.

The statement by Engineer Mutiu Yinka Idris, who claimed involvement in the projects on behalf of Geofocus in several media outlets and amplified on social media, is baseless and an attempt to mislead the public.

The company warned investors and the public to disregard any media advertisements or reports from Geofocus, describing them as unauthorized and misleading.

AEC Unity Network stated that its project is still in the planning stages, with no concurrent developments on the same corridor by any other entity.

To prevent confusion and potential fraud, AEC Unity Network urged local and foreign investors to verify information only through its official channels and avoid engaging with Geofocus on matters relating to the Abuja-Lagos Super Highway and High-Speed Train projects.

This infrastructure initiative, which includes a direct expressway and rail connection between Abuja and Lagos, is expected to enhance transportation efficiency and foster economic growth.

AEC Unity Network reiterated its commitment to transparency and professionalism, urging the public to engage only through its official channels for accurate information about the projects.

Continue Reading

Trending