Connect with us

News and Report

Ikpeazu’s Aide Bombs Otti Again, Says Dishing out Half-Truths about Abia’s Finances is Deceitful

Published

on

 

RE: ABIA FINANCIAL STATUS: SEPARATING THE FACTS FROM IKPEAZU’S FICTION

 

My attention has been drawn to the above titled publication by Governor Alex Otti, wherein he fruitlessly attempted to divert attention of members of the public and artfully avoided the issues raised in my widely circulated publication that elicited his latest response. Not only did it take him more than 5 days to conjure a response to what is fairly straight forward, he even opted to delve into his familiar field of political maraboutism by divining who will join which party as if everyone is struggling to break his infamous record of moving from PDP through APGA then APC before eventually perching in Labour Party. Sadly for him, not everyone is as restless as him, or even interested in venturing into the ignoble art of endless political turncoatism of which he is an expert.

 

As if that was not enough, the whole political establishment in Nigeria is already aware of his subterranean moves to dump Peter Obi and Labour Party to rejoin APC so as to attempt to survive his inevitable sacking by the tribunal.

 

No matter how much he howls and growls, Otti ‘s little veiled threat of unleashing anti-corruption agencies on Ikpeazu is both laughable and childish, especially coming from a man who has been their regular guest for decades yet the world did not come to an end.

 

Every leader must be ready to give account of his stewardship and when Otti exits his current office he will also have to give account to anti-graft agencies. Same way Ikpeazu is ready to give his.

For the avoidance of doubt, I will restate the issues I raised in my publication of 10th June 2023 titled “Is It True that Ikpeazu Left Nothing for His Successor?” Feel free to examine vis-à-vis the needlessly verbose beautiful nonsense that took the whole of Otti’s government five days to churn out.

 

1. I stated that “as at the time of Dr Okezie Ikpeazu’s exit from office, the state was not owing any commercial bank including temporary overdrafts. He paid off all.”

 

Those familiar with current commercial banking operations and DMO regulations will agree with me that state governments are not permitted to borrow beyond their tenure. That, I believe, was why UBA for example clamped on Abia State funds for the last two months of the Ikpeazu administration in order to clear the temporary overdrafts (TOD) owed them.

 

The commercial bank loans listed in the statement by Otti’s government were not obtained or signed off by the Abia State Government led by Dr Ikpeazu. From my investigation, what I believe happened was that those were mostly borrowings done by the Federal Government on behalf of the 36 states of the federation, and it’s either Otti wants to mislead the world into believing that it was Governor Ikpeazu that took the loans or he just wants to desperately deny Abians the true amount left for him in Abia coffers by the former governor.

 

I hereby challenge Otti’s government to publish application and approval documents for the listed loans so we can all see the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

 

When the federal government borrowed from CBN and gave bailout loans to states, it was only Ikpeazu, among all the benefitting states, that set up a Labour-led committee to disburse the money. Indeed, ICPC and NGF applauded him for the prudent management of the funds having monitored same.

 

2. I also stated that “ Abia State under the watch of Dr Ikpeazu invested $5,000,000.00 in Geometric Power Company. That’s a near cash asset. ”

 

Happily, Otti’s government did not deny this fact in their statement. For the avoidance of doubt, $5m is equivalent to at least N3.76b today at black market rate, and since the government did not deny this, we can safely conclude that they have confirmed the existence of the near-cash investment I mentioned.

 

3. “As at Friday, 9th June 2023, 11 whole days after Otti became Governor, Abia state received the sum of Twenty Four Billion Naira (N24,000,000,000.00) through the Nigeria Governors’ Forum as part of a total of N48b standing to the credit of the state. The money was earned under the watch of Dr Ikpeazu but paid the State under the watch of Otti.”

 

Rather than admit to the people of Abia State that they actually received a whooping Twenty Four Billion Naira on the date I clearly stated, the Otti administration chose to publish purported balance as at 28th May 2023. Abians must insist that the administration confirm that they have received the N24b as we are already hearing rumors of plans to use the money to settle campaign debts and compromise election petition judges.

 

It is important to emphasise the fact that other states got the same money from the Nigerian Governor’s Forum as Abia with the state credited to the tune of N24b out of N48b earned under Ikpeazu’s watch.

 

I therefore challenge Otti’s administration to publicly state without equivocation that they have not received the money, as I stated, so that we, as citizens, can use legal instruments to compel the concerned bank and institutions to respond accordingly.

 

Furthermore, according to them, the Ikpeazu administration left a liability of N21b in pensions and N4.4b in contractor debt. I wish to plead with the government to use the N24b and pay off those two debts substantially since the liabilities and assets were earned by the same administration. That is just common sense.

 

4. “Ikpeazu’s administration perfected a Fifty Million Dollars ($50,000,000.00) World Bank facility at 0.06% interest rate with 10 years repayment moratorium for construction of more than 500km roads including Port Harcourt Road, Aba. The implication is that the current administration can commence drawing down on that facility from day one to construct critical roads in Abia State and will not have to repay the money over the pendency of its tenure, assuming it is up to 8 years.”

 

In their response, the government claimed that, “The $200m and $50m they claimed they left for the new administration are loans they were pursuing which are yet to crystalize.”

 

Interestingly my publication clearly stated that they are loans and even gave the repayment terms. Whatever they mean by “yet to crystalize” will be made clear to all very soon. As far as I know, Governor Ikpeazu was scheduled to flag off the road projects listed in the $50m facility two days to his exit from office but decided to leave it for his successor to “use in hitting the ground running”. When the administration finally sees whatever “crystal” they are looking for, I hope they will appropriately give credit to Ikpeazu who worked on the facilities from start to finish.

 

5. “While the Ikpeazu administration superintended over the state for most of May 2023, it is the current administration that will receive the FAAC allocation for that month.”

 

Interestingly, Otti’s government tactfully dodged this, too, in their response. But I know for a fact that they have already moved to receive this allocation. As soon as the funds drop, I will alert Abians as part of my social responsibility just like Ekeoma and Otti were doing while they were in opposition for 8 years.

 

6. “Similarly, internally generated revenue for the month of May 2023 is also available to the new administration.”

 

According to the Otti administration, “Poor internal generation of revenue, with the little they generated frittered away in payment to consultants for no added value. They pay as much as 20% which is highly unethical.”

 

As we have now seen the administration has engaged in “ethical” practice by hiring someone indicted by Anambra State Government for fraud with the police directed to arrest him, and for the reason that, “a greater percentage of the POS’ you introduced were set up to divert IGR to private accounts”, to manage our IGR. While Abians are waiting to learn who owns the private account and the bank allegedly used for the Anambra sleaze, suffice it to state that it is better to pay consultants 20% than to hand over the whole IGR to someone that will divert all our IGR to private accounts as Anambra experienced.

 

7. “Prior to the exit of Dr Okezie Ikpeazu from office, Abia State Government and Office of Accountant General of the Federation reconciled their accounts with Six Billion Naira (N6,000,0000,000.00) standing to the credit of the state. What that also says is that the Ikpeazu administration was not owing federal government but rather it is the FGN that is owing the state. The current administration has access to that additional fund of N6b.”

 

Did anyone read where the administration denied this fact in their response? Not at all. Why? Because it is true. Undeniable!

 

For the avoidance of doubt, Otti’s government is set to receive this amount this month alongside the regular monthlyFAAC allocation to the state. Yet, he won’t give credit to Ikpeazu for it because of his bitterness and hatred for the man simply because he defeated him twice at the polls, a reality he is yet to recover from.

 

8. The listing of gratuity arrears of N27b is as deceptive as the whole statement from the administration. According to a recent public statement by Abia NLC, since 2001, successive Abia State Governments have not paid gratuities but to continue to mislead the public, the current administration wishes to mischievously present the total arrears as if they all became due under Ikpeazu. If anything, I know the Ikpeazu administration paid at least N100m as gratuity during the period Obinna Oriaku was Commissioner for Finance.

 

9. Just seeing one of the captured items in Otti’s response has double triggered my worries about the “one chance” bus Abians have boarded. Please, Otti’sgovernment, publish the details of what you called “SALARIES AND SUBVENTIONS ARREARS” so that Ndi Abia can see the make up. Rats cannot steal the food of a man that is awake, hence, no body should use smart terms to confuse and confound ndi Abia to enable convenient stealing of our resources.

 

10. For whatever it is worth, let me remind Governor Alex Otti that it was his same bitter self that manipulated and instigated multiple strike actions in the state leading to withdrawal of accreditation of the institutions he mentioned just to score cheap political points. Yet, to the glory of God, accreditation was long restored to those institutions before the exit of Governor Ikpeazu.

 

11. If they think that we did not know that it was Alex Otti that reportedly instigated Labour Unions and used industrial action to play politics in the state, then they are deceiving themselves because, in due course, he will reap whatever he sowed unless he repents and confess to the nocturnal meetings, phone calls and financial inducements.

 

12. If they are still saying that there is no $200m AfDB facility, I wish to encourage the signatories to ask Otti about the same loan he worked so hard to stop including traveling to London to meet Senator Sani to plead that the facility be withheld from Ikpeazu’s administration till he is elected. That same loan he confirmed to journalists that he stopped was in actual fact only delayed in accordance with his request as it became ready to be drawn on before the exit of Ikpeazu. Otti’s government must give Ikpeazu credit for the work he did or publicly decline the loans as supposed better administrators.

 

13. Finally, my guess is that it took Otti’s administration so long to respond to the issues I raised concerning Abia’s financial status as bequeathed by Ikpeazu because, either they had no knowledge of the issues, or they were too complicated for them to understand because they had flatly denied the issues on some platforms they were published.

 

14. Let me make it abundantly clear to Otti and his aides that there is nothing hidden in government and, they should be transparent and honest to Abians. At least, that was what they promised the people.

 

15. Lastly, the threat and use of EFCC to intimidate anyone is a frutiless tactic deployed just to make media noise. No one as innocent as former Governor Okezie Ikpeazu, PhD, can never be intimidated with the threat of EFCC. Try as hard as they may, nobody can foist a dictatorship on Abians! The art of threatening every dissenter or attempt to cow alternative voices is no longer in vogue as Nigeria keeps making progress on her path to democratic sophistication.

 

16. We are very much aware of the meeting Ferdinand Ekeoma, Otti’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, had with Abia bloggers two days ago to fund “6 months of attack against Ikpeazu” and decided to watch until the attacks start. Let me state clearly that since Otti wants to run his government on falsehood, mischief, malice and strife, we are very much prepared for him and his team. Nobody in this state is more Abian than the other.

 

17. While we want to believe that Otti’s response to my initial article is a subtle commencement of the planned attacks against Ikpeazu given the EFCC dimension to it, we wish to remind those concerned that those who pelt another with pebbles should expect rocks in return.

 

Ikechukwu Iroha

Former Media Aide to Governor Ikpeazu

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

Alleged 76bn, $31.5m Fraud: EFCC Arraigns Ex AMCON MD, Ahmed Kuru, Four Others in Lagos

Published

on

By

 

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, 20 January, 2025 arraigned a former Managing Director of Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria AMCON, Ahmed Kuru and four others for allegedly defrauding Arik Airline N76 billion and $31.5 million, respectively.

 

Other defendants are former Receiver Manager of Arik Airline Ltd, Kamilu Omokide, Chief Executive Officer of the airline, Captain Roy Ilegbodu, and Super Bravo Ltd and Union Bank PLC.

 

The defendants were arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos on a six-count charge bordering on theft, abuse of office and stealing by dishonestly taking the property of another.

 

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to all the six-count charges when they were read to them.

 

Count one reads: “That you, Union Bank Nigeria Plc, sometime in 2011 or thereabouts, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, with the intention of causing and/or inducing unwarranted sale of Arik Air loans and bank guarantees with Union Bank, made false statements to the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), regarding Arik Air Limited’s performing loans, following which you transferred a bogus figure of N71,000,000,000.00 (Seventy-One Billion Naira) to AMCON.”

 

Count two reads: “That you, Ahmed Lawal Kuru, Kamilu Alaba Omokide as Receiver Manager of Arik Air Limited, and Captain Roy Ilegbodu, Chief Executive Officer of Arik Air Limited in Receivership, sometime in 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, fraudulently converted to the use of NG Eagle Limited the total sum of N4,900,000,000.00 (Four Billion Nine Hundred Million Naira only), property of Arik Air Limited”.

 

Count five reads: “That you, Kamilu Alaba Omokide, Ahmed Lawal Kuru and Capt. Roy Ilegbodu, on the 12th day of February, 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, being public officers, directed to be done in abuse of the authority of your office and with intention of obtaining undue advantage for yourself and cronies an arbitrary act, to wit: intentionally authorizing the tear down and destruction of 5N-JEA with Serial No. 15058 valued at $31.5million (Thirty One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars), an arbitrary act, which act is prejudicial to the economic stability of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Arik Air Limited”.

 

The counsel to the first and third defendants, Prof Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, informed the court of a motion for bail application dated November 28, 2024 and November 29, 2024 for the two defendants.

 

Osipitan prayed the court that the defendants be granted bail on liberal terms.  According to him, the first defendant had no criminal records and that the EFCC granted him administration bail  which he didn’t jump.  “We pray the court grants bail to the two defendants on the same liberal terms given to them by EFCC,” he said.

 

EFCC Counsel, Wahab Shittu SAN, filed counter-affidavits dated December 2, 2024 against the first defendant and also another counter affidavits dated December 22, 2024 against the third defendant.  Shittu prayed the court to dismiss their bail applications.

 

According to him, the two defendants are facing serious offences of economic sabotage. However, he agreed with the second and third defence counsel that they are presumed innocent pending the determination of the court. Shittu , however, added that the temptation of the defendants leaving the country was very high. He thereafter prayed that accelerated hearing be granted and the defendants’ international passports be seized by the court.

 

“But if my lord decides to be magnanimous to grant them bail, we shall be praying for stringent conditions because we are particular about their attendance in court. “We urge that they should submit their international passports with the court in order to ensure that they come for trial,” he said.

 

The counsel to the second defendant, Olasupo Shasore, SAN in his motion for bail dated December 6, 2024 and filed on the same day, urged the court to also grant bail to his client on self recognition.

 

The prosecuting counsel in his counter affidavits dated January 17, 2025, opposed the bail application of the second defendant.

 

He said the application for bail was incompetent and should be struck out. Shittu cited relevance laws to buttress his argument. “My lord, the record of this court is to the effect that the second defendant, at one point, absconded in which your lordship had to issue a bench warrant. “The learned silk for the second defendant is not the defendant on trial and it is very unhealthy for a counsel to stand as a surety for a defendant.

 

“I urge my lord, in exercising his discretion, to take all this into consideration because our concern is the appearance of the second defendant in court so that he does not abscond.”

 

After listening to the arguments from all the parties, Justice Dada granted bail to the defendants in the sum of N20 million Naira each with two sureties in like sum.   The sureties must be gainfully employed and deposed to means of identification.

 

She also directed that the defendants must submit their international passports with the registrar of the court.

 

Justice Dada adjourned the matter till March 17, 18, and 19, 2025 for commencement of trial.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

Trending