Connect with us

News and Report

Inside the shutdown of Lazerpay, the Web3 startup that was high on hope but short on capital

Published

on

A year and a half after its incorporation, Lazerpay ceased operations. Here’s the story of how the lauded startup was unable to secure funding and its eventual shutdown.

Two months after sponsoring Blocathon, a hackathon for Web3 designers, crypto payment platform Lazerpay shared that it was shutting down its business. It was bittersweet, considering the fact that a blockchain hackathon is also where the company’s founder, Njoku Emmanuel, reportedly built his first smart contract. He would eventually get to the final stage of the hackathon, and he credits his success to a lot of Udemy courses and hours of coding practice during the pandemic. By 2020, the decentralisation bug had bitten Njoku and in 2021, he launched Lazerpay.

The ideation of Lazerpay
In 2021, crypto was having a high-water moment in Africa. Every conversation was about decentralisation, the blockchain, and the big changes crypto would make. While crypto-optimism elsewhere was driven by a distrust of banks and the idea that the current monetary system is obsolete, the premise in Africa was simple. For Africans, crypto was a way to make and preserve wealth and a way to simplify payments. On a continent where international payments can be complex, it was a compelling promise.

It explains why Njoku said he rejected a $300,000 job offer at Avarta. Instead, he, Abdulfatai Suleiman, and his cousin Prosper Ubi founded Lazerpay in October 2021. The newly formed company provided APIs that let platforms integrate and collect crypto payments. It also provided links that anyone could use to collect payments directly into their wallets or banks. This was a sensible play, with crypto-acceptance on the rise. Investors were also falling over themselves to fund African blockchain startups. Every blockchain engineer with gumption was partnering with trusted and skilled friends or work colleagues to solve Africa’s payments problem. The thinking was that taking away the banks and issuing partners as middlemen could be profitable businesses. In the end, the marketing spiel was simple: Lazerpay was gunning to be the Stripe for crypto.

“We only deal in [stablecoins] BUSD, DAI, USDC, and USDT. We focus on only these because they are backed by the US dollar, and it is important for us to provide a stable, secure, and relatively risk-free financial solution for our users,” Njoku told Disrupt Africa in an interview. This quote doesn’t tell the whole story of how audacious the idea for Lazerpay was.

According to Ohalewe Richmond, the designer who came up with Lazerpay’s first logo, “I thought the idea was crazy. We know Paystack and Flutterwave, but the idea of getting businesses to process payments in crypto seemed crazy to me, and I think that was the general vibe about crypto payment in Nigeria then.”

The early days
In several interviews, Njoku stated that he and his CTO, Abdulfatai Suleiman, often worked overnight to build Lazerpay’s infrastructure. “We had our toothbrushes in the office, and only went home if we needed a bath,” he said in a Founders Connect interview.

Richmond Ohalewe, the designer, says it took him three weeks to develop the initial Lazerpay logo—an infinity sign that took the shape of an L. “If you look at the logo, you can see a bridge. Lazerpay wanted to connect people by giving them and their businesses fast crypto payments anywhere in the world,” he explained. “At the time, they were looking to raise money to get started, and I was there to help them produce a compelling brand identity,” Ohalewe added.

The company stuck with Ohalewe’s vision and went on to announce an angel round of $100,000 in November 2021 after incorporating it in October. The round came from investors like Paystack’s CEO, Shola Akinlade, Xend Finance’s CEO, Ugochukwu Aronu, and several other angel investors.

Four months later, the company redesigned the logo to a solid blue image that sits like the quadrant of a pie but with rectangles shooting out from the sturdy L- shaped base, like lasers. However, it became apparent that the most prominent identity of the brand was in fact the young founder, Njoku.

An instant darling
Nearly every major piece of publicity that the company mentioned centered on how incredible it was that a 19-year-old was running his own tech startup and getting investors to put their money behind it. It was a captivating story. Njoku started learning to code at 15, dropped out of the university to take a tech internship, landed a $3000 per-week job, and eventually rejected a $300,000 job offer from Avarta.

According to Joyce Imiegha, an associate producer of Founders Connect, a show that Njoku appeared on and that spotlights African founders, “He was 19 but didn’t talk or act like a teenager. He was confident, very assertive, and obviously intelligent. He articulated his thoughts and opinions about the problems that he was solving so well.” Joyce later went on to be his personal brand manager and do some PR work for Lazerpay.

At the time of the Founder’s Connect interview in the first quarter of 2022, the startup had grown to a team of 15 people. Popular opinion about his leadership was that he was empathetic, considerate, and inspiring. A former employee told TechCabal, “We had a flat organisational structure so he was a very accessible leader. You could go into his DMs to recommend ideas or make complaints.” However, some employees maintain that he was rather too friendly and sometimes allowed his personal relationship with his workers to interfere with the hierarchy at work. “There was a clique at work. While cliques are not uncommon, this was uncomfortable because our CEO was in it. It was as though more people had access to him than others,” the source told TechCabal.

Another emphasized, however, that “Even though he has expressed that next time he would not sacrifice performance for the sake of relationships, I thought he was very professional. He took action against apparently bad behaviour and rewarded exceptional attitude and work.”

Life at Lazerpay
While the company still operated, the social media posts of the team members show that they were excited about their work at the company. Even some who left before the shutdown look back fondly on their time there, as their work at the company opened doors to bigger and better-paying jobs in other startups. “It was the first time I worked at a web3 startup, and it really set me up for the success I have experienced since,” an ex-employee told TechCabal.

“My friends were not forthcoming about how much they earned, but I know they were one of the best-paying startups then [in Nigeria],” Ohalewa said on a call with TechCabal. An anonymous source told TechCabal that some members of the engineering team were earning as much as $1,500, a lot of money in Nigeria, where all, if not most, of its employees lived. A non-technical staff said he was earning about N300,000 before he left the startup. Even though the CEO, Njoku, was reportedly personally in charge of remuneration, several sources told TechCabal that he did not take a salary. “He made a lot of money before working at Lazerpay, and that kept him going,” an anonymous source said to TechCabal in an interview.

Improving the product
While the team grew in combined experience and number, the product did too. It underwent some evolution to provide more value to its targeted users—businesses and organisations. In February 2022, they announced a donation link feature for NGOs, which the popular Nigerian NGO ChessinSlums used in a campaign to raise $1 million. The fundraising got international attention, attracting donations from celebrities like Paris Hilton. Beyond facilitating fundraising with its new donation feature, Lazerpay also promised to match every dollar donated using the feature.

In the weeks that followed, the company partnered with and integrated its crypto payment infrastructure on betting platform BetDemand, fintech startups PayDay, Direcharge, and Risevest, and health-tech startup NguvuHealth. In addition to announcing these partnerships, it also invited more businesses to use its payment link or integrate its LazerPay button into their apps or websites. The startup often offered giveaways of up to $100 to incentivize users to join its Telegram community or use its technology.

In March, six months after the business was founded, it announced that over 800 businesses had been onboarded on its platform. They had also reportedly processed over $100,000 in transactions. Before the end of 2022, LazerPay had evolved from enabling payment in stablecoins to allowing users to swap stablecoins and receive payment in fiat (currencies of countries such as Nigeria, Kenya, Rwanda, Ghana, the US, and the UAE). The team also included a feature that allowed vendors to display pictures of their goods to buyers. It also enabled the integration into global e-commerce stores like Shopify and WooCommerce. The startup called this version of itself Lazerpay V2.0.

“Getting businesses to use the platform was challenging at first,” Barakat Olatinwo, growth lead at Lazerpay, said on a call. She attributed it to the relative unfamiliarity of the technology but added that “we usually get positive responses when we explain how it works.”

Finding product-market fit
Sources close to the startup note that Lazerpay was not able to achieve product-market fit (PMF), and while some blame the marketing strategies of the startup, others say it was just a matter of timing. “It is one thing to facilitate crypto payment for individuals, and it is another to do the same for businesses. It is novel, hard, and expensive to do because of the level of education about crypto in the country,” a source told TechCabal.

A source who blames the marketing strategy said, ”It was just weird to see a B2B crypto startup doing most of its marketing on Twitter instead of Instagram or LinkedIn, where most businesses are.” TechCabal asked the growth lead, Barakat, if she would do anything differently if they had the chance again. She said she wouldn’t and that she remains optimistic about the potential of B2B crypto payments.

A source told TechCabal, however, that they wish Lazerpay had pivoted earlier. “I wish that they were more agile and made necessary changes to product features when they saw that things were not going as planned. It is expensive to be the one breaking ground in a market. But some founders have successfully stuck it out with a novel product and made it work, so it is understandable that they kept trying to make it work,” they added.

The sunset of a crypto darling
In November, Nestcoin, one of the investors in Lazerpay, shared that it had lost significant operating capital when FTX, the exchange it held monies, crashed. Nestcoin laid off staff last year, and its CEO stopped taking a salary. This began the public struggles of crypto startups in Africa.

In the same month, after stopping the salaries of the management team and slashing the salaries of other employees, Lazerpay also began layoffs. The founders had reportedly tried to keep the startup afloat with their own savings, but that was not enough.

On Twitter, Njoku shared a letter announcing that the lead investor in its seed round had pulled out due to “market conditions and disagreement on terms”. A source close to the matter told TechCabal that the layoffs happened after the founder rejected an unfavourable acquisition offer from an existing investor. According to the source, the founders and one more employee remained working at the startup with no pay until the shutdown.

A disagreement on terms
Considering the good faith Njoku seems to have enjoyed in the ecosystem, one cannot help but wonder why said investor pulled out or why another or others did not step up to keep the apparently promising startup afloat.

An anonymous source close to the matter tried to explain why. “[In Lazerpay’s first funding round] Nestcoin and 4DX Ventures invested.” They added that “in three months, Lazerpay returned to the market looking to raise money at a $15 million valuation”. They also shared that at that point, Lazerpay had yet to gain the type of adoption that would make it worth a $15 million valuation. “Not a lot of people were really using it; the payment volume was super low at $80,000”.

According to the source, Lazerpay’s fundraising process fell apart because the startup refused to budge on its valuation. “They got the interest of Thunes (a B2B cross-border payment network with a presence in 100 countries and headquartered in Singapore), but somewhere along the line, Thunes grew uncomfortable with the valuation and wanted to revise the terms. Lazerpay resisted.” TechCabal was not able to independently verify these claims.

“Unfortunately, that period coincided with the period when crypto enthusiasm fell because of FTX”, they added.

The founder took to social media to announce the shutdown, and the news was welcomed with unanimous sympathy and applause for Njoku, people, in many words, called him daring and inspirational for attempting to build in such tough economic conditions.

The news was also accompanied by an announcement that the startup’s IP was up for sale. It has not been confirmed if anyone has bought it yet. Njoku was not able to provide any comment on the events and opinions reported in this story as he is still processing the shutdown of his startup.

News and Report

Alleged 76bn, $31.5m Fraud: EFCC Arraigns Ex AMCON MD, Ahmed Kuru, Four Others in Lagos

Published

on

By

 

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, 20 January, 2025 arraigned a former Managing Director of Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria AMCON, Ahmed Kuru and four others for allegedly defrauding Arik Airline N76 billion and $31.5 million, respectively.

 

Other defendants are former Receiver Manager of Arik Airline Ltd, Kamilu Omokide, Chief Executive Officer of the airline, Captain Roy Ilegbodu, and Super Bravo Ltd and Union Bank PLC.

 

The defendants were arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos on a six-count charge bordering on theft, abuse of office and stealing by dishonestly taking the property of another.

 

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to all the six-count charges when they were read to them.

 

Count one reads: “That you, Union Bank Nigeria Plc, sometime in 2011 or thereabouts, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, with the intention of causing and/or inducing unwarranted sale of Arik Air loans and bank guarantees with Union Bank, made false statements to the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), regarding Arik Air Limited’s performing loans, following which you transferred a bogus figure of N71,000,000,000.00 (Seventy-One Billion Naira) to AMCON.”

 

Count two reads: “That you, Ahmed Lawal Kuru, Kamilu Alaba Omokide as Receiver Manager of Arik Air Limited, and Captain Roy Ilegbodu, Chief Executive Officer of Arik Air Limited in Receivership, sometime in 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, fraudulently converted to the use of NG Eagle Limited the total sum of N4,900,000,000.00 (Four Billion Nine Hundred Million Naira only), property of Arik Air Limited”.

 

Count five reads: “That you, Kamilu Alaba Omokide, Ahmed Lawal Kuru and Capt. Roy Ilegbodu, on the 12th day of February, 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, being public officers, directed to be done in abuse of the authority of your office and with intention of obtaining undue advantage for yourself and cronies an arbitrary act, to wit: intentionally authorizing the tear down and destruction of 5N-JEA with Serial No. 15058 valued at $31.5million (Thirty One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars), an arbitrary act, which act is prejudicial to the economic stability of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Arik Air Limited”.

 

The counsel to the first and third defendants, Prof Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, informed the court of a motion for bail application dated November 28, 2024 and November 29, 2024 for the two defendants.

 

Osipitan prayed the court that the defendants be granted bail on liberal terms.  According to him, the first defendant had no criminal records and that the EFCC granted him administration bail  which he didn’t jump.  “We pray the court grants bail to the two defendants on the same liberal terms given to them by EFCC,” he said.

 

EFCC Counsel, Wahab Shittu SAN, filed counter-affidavits dated December 2, 2024 against the first defendant and also another counter affidavits dated December 22, 2024 against the third defendant.  Shittu prayed the court to dismiss their bail applications.

 

According to him, the two defendants are facing serious offences of economic sabotage. However, he agreed with the second and third defence counsel that they are presumed innocent pending the determination of the court. Shittu , however, added that the temptation of the defendants leaving the country was very high. He thereafter prayed that accelerated hearing be granted and the defendants’ international passports be seized by the court.

 

“But if my lord decides to be magnanimous to grant them bail, we shall be praying for stringent conditions because we are particular about their attendance in court. “We urge that they should submit their international passports with the court in order to ensure that they come for trial,” he said.

 

The counsel to the second defendant, Olasupo Shasore, SAN in his motion for bail dated December 6, 2024 and filed on the same day, urged the court to also grant bail to his client on self recognition.

 

The prosecuting counsel in his counter affidavits dated January 17, 2025, opposed the bail application of the second defendant.

 

He said the application for bail was incompetent and should be struck out. Shittu cited relevance laws to buttress his argument. “My lord, the record of this court is to the effect that the second defendant, at one point, absconded in which your lordship had to issue a bench warrant. “The learned silk for the second defendant is not the defendant on trial and it is very unhealthy for a counsel to stand as a surety for a defendant.

 

“I urge my lord, in exercising his discretion, to take all this into consideration because our concern is the appearance of the second defendant in court so that he does not abscond.”

 

After listening to the arguments from all the parties, Justice Dada granted bail to the defendants in the sum of N20 million Naira each with two sureties in like sum.   The sureties must be gainfully employed and deposed to means of identification.

 

She also directed that the defendants must submit their international passports with the registrar of the court.

 

Justice Dada adjourned the matter till March 17, 18, and 19, 2025 for commencement of trial.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

Trending