Connect with us

News and Report

Petrol scarcity set to worsen as NNPCL admits $6bn debt

Published

on

There are indications that the pump price of premium motor spirit, popularly known as petrol, may rise in filling stations as the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited finally admitted that it was facing challenges due to a $6bn debt.

After weeks of denial, the NNPC admitted on Sunday that it owed its petrol suppliers the sum of $6bn, saying it was facing financial strains due to petrol supply costs.

In a statement by its Chief Corporate Communications Officer, Olufemi Soneye, the state-owned energy company subtly confirmed that the debt was the reason for the fuel queues in filling stations across the country, stating that it is impacting supply sustainability.

The PUNCH reported in July that Nigeria’s debt to suppliers of petrol surpassed $6bn, making the NNPC struggle to cover the gap between fixed pump prices and international fuel costs.

A Reuters report stated that the national oil company began struggling early this year when late PMS payments surpassed $3bn.

The company had still not paid for some January imports, traders said, and the debt keeps piling up. Under contract terms, NNPC is meant to pay within 90 days of delivery.

“The only reason traders are putting up with it is the $250,000 a month (per cargo) for late payment compensation,” one industry source said.

Since June, Nigeria’s tenders to buy PMS were smaller, traders said.

From two in July, three more traders were said to have stopped supplying PMS to the NNPC as of now, making a total of five unpaid traders.

But Soneye, in August, denied that the NNPC owed international oil traders $6.8bn.

“NNPC Ltd does not owe the sum of $6.8bn to any international trader(s). In the oil trading business, transactions are carried out on credit, so it is normal to have outstanding amounts at certain times. However, NNPC Ltd, through its subsidiary NNPC Trading, maintains many open trade credit lines with several traders. The company is fulfilling its obligations on a first-in-first-out basis,” he stated.

The NNPC has given various reasons for the lingering fuel crisis, including bad weather and the inability of vessels to discharge, among others, but none of the measures it has taken stopped the queues at the filling stations.

On Sunday, the company made a U-turn in admitting that it was facing financial constraints.

“NNPC Ltd has acknowledged recent reports in national newspapers regarding the company’s significant debt to petrol suppliers.

“This financial strain has placed considerable pressure on the company and poses a threat to the sustainability of fuel supply,” Soneye said in a statement titled, ‘NNPC Ltd Faces Financial Strain Due to PMS Supply Costs, Impacting Supply Sustainability.’

He added that the company was collaborating with relevant government agencies and other stakeholders to maintain a consistent supply of petroleum products nationwide.

“In line with the Petroleum Industry Act, NNPC Ltd remains dedicated to its role as the supplier of last resort, ensuring national energy security.

“We are actively collaborating with relevant government agencies and other stakeholders to maintain a consistent supply of petroleum products nationwide.”

As Nigerians continue to complain over the lingering fuel crisis since July, the sudden admission by the NNPC of a claim it had severally denied, fuelled speculations that the Federal Government might stop paying what it termed “under-recovery” or shortfall on imported petrol.

The PUNCH learnt that the company might be contemplating taking the only way out of the debt challenges, which was to stop paying shortfalls that might no longer be sustainable.

When this happens, operators said the price of petrol would rise above N1,000 and interested accredited marketers would be able to import petrol, thereby removing the NNPC monopoly.

FG pays subsidies

Recently, the NNPC, being the sole importer of petrol, admitted that the Federal Government subsidised the current price of PMS, which the marketers recently put at N1, 117 per litre.

Though the NNPC denied paying fuel subsidies to marketers in the last nine years, it said the government allowed it to sell at a price below the landing cost.

The Chief Financial Officer of the company, Alhaji Umar Ajiya, stated this in Abuja when the company presented its 2023 report.

“In the last eight to nine years, NNPC has not paid anybody a dime as subsidy; no one has been paid a kobo by NNPC in the name of subsidy. No marketer has received any money from us by way of subsidy.

“What has been happening is that we have been importing PMS, which has been landing at a specific cost price, and the government tells us to sell it at half price. So, the difference between the landing price and that half price is a shortfall.

“And the deal is between the Federation and NNPC to reconcile. Sometimes, they give us money, so there is no money exchanging hands with any marketer in the name of subsidy,” he said.

He stated that credit lines were prevalent in downstream businesses based on the worldwide commercial system.

He added that the company was in an open credit agreement with PMS suppliers in the past, with term-line contracts for payment.

Also, Dapo Segun, the Executive Vice President of Downstream at NNPCL, said that establishing an open credit agreement with suppliers spoke volumes about the credibility the national oil company had built over time.

“Concerning the outstanding to the suppliers, it is not in that magnitude that has been put out, it is lower than the $6.8bn

“What really matters is the relationship between us and our suppliers to ensure that we keep faith in making these payments to our suppliers, which we have done over time.

“You would understand that it is not a static figure, and I wouldn’t want to quote any figure. When we make payments, it goes down, and when they supply products, it goes up. It is a dynamic way, but the most important thing is to ensure that we continue to make PMS available across the country,” he said.

According to the NNPC, being the only importer of petrol, the Federal Government pays it to sell fuel to Nigerians at a subsidised rate.

However, this has led to incessant fuel scarcity across the nation as the debt to the international oil companies keeps piling up.

On May 29, 2023, President Bola Tinubu, announced that the fuel subsidy was gone.

However, with the floating of the naira, the price of imported petrol rose above the purchasing power of an average Nigerian, causing the Federal Government to intervene by capping the price below the landing cost and paying the shortfall.

The failure of the Federal Government to pay the shortfall is impacting fuel importation.

In May, the International Monetary Fund warned the Nigerian government to remove what it called implicit fuel and electricity subsidies.

In a report published by the IMF, the organisation told Nigeria that the subsidies would guzzle 3 per cent of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product in 2024 as against 1 per cent in the year before.

According to the report, the IMF commended the Federal Government for, among other things, phasing out “costly and regressive energy subsidies”, saying this was critical to creating fiscal space for development spending and strengthening social protection while maintaining debt sustainability.

IMF noted after Tinubu removed subsidy, “adequate compensatory measures for the poor were not scaled up in a timely manner and subsequently paused over corruption concerns. Capping pump prices below cost reintroduced implicit subsidies by end-2023 to help Nigerians cope with high inflation and exchange rate depreciation”.

It appears the Federal Government is now ready to heed the advice of the IMF.

‘Partial deregulation killing’

The National Vice Chairman of the Independent Petroleum Marketers Association of Nigeria, Hammed Fashola, has charged the government to either return the fuel subsidy or remove it totally instead of engaging in partial deregulation.

“The Federal Government and the NNPC should just do this thing once and for all. If they want to deregulate, let them deregulate fully, because we know where we are going; that’s why you’re seeing this disparity whereby the NNPC retail is selling at N580 in Lagos and independent marketers will be selling at N800. You can see the gap. It’s killing our business, we are not making progress; it’s killing us.

“If the Federal Government wants to bring back the subsidy, let them bring it back fully so that everybody will know that we are on subsidised product; and it should cut across, not just for NNPC Retail. So, we will know that we are back to the subsidy regime which I don’t think is good for the economy of the country,” Fashola emphasised.

He stated that the price disparity is not good for the image of independent marketers, saying the masses do not understand why they sell at higher rates.

“If not that we are trying to educate people, many see us as bad people, they didn’t know it’s not our fault,” he posited.

The IPMAN leader added that the fuel crisis was because the NNPC has remained the only importer of PMS.

“The problem is that it’s only the NNPC that can bring this product because of forex. They are the only ones selling. Two or three independent marketers once tried to import, but they could not,” he stated.

The marketers submitted, “We need to brace up and face the reality once and for all. If the subsidy should go, let it go so that all of us will be operating on a level playing ground. That’s what we are asking for, not that NNPC Retail will be favoured and others will be suffering, and people will be seeing us as Shylock businessmen; it is not too good,” Fashola stressed.

As the fuel crisis lingers for about two months, our correspondent observed that the price keeps rising in filling stations owned by independent marketers.

From less than N700 in July, a litre of petrol rose gradually to above N900 in most filling stations in August ending. The upward trend continues with no successful attempt to stop it as of today.

“I just bought a litre of petrol for N980 in Ogere,” a visibly angry bus conductor told a passenger negotiating transport fare along the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway.

In filling stations being run by major marketers like NNPC Retail, Mobil, MRS, Conoil, Ardova, and TotalEnergies, the product sells below N700, but with long queues of motorists struggling to buy fuel.

It was also observed during the weekend that many of these major marketers, including the NNPC, run skeletal services due to inconsistent fuel supply.

The NNPC spokesman, Olufemi Soneye, told The PUNCH on different occasions that the queues being experienced in fuel stations across the country would be over in a few days.

However, the promises have continued to fail, leaving Nigerians in the struggle for energy security, especially in the transport sector.

Meanwhile, a depot operator told our correspondent that the desperation of marketers to get PMS should be blamed for the rise in price.

The operator, who did not want his name in print, told The PUNCH that many of the marketers struggle to outplay one another and are ready to buy at any price for they know they can sell at a higher price to make a profit.

Nonetheless, the operator submitted that the lack of enough supply is responsible for the desperation, saying a number of depots have been out of stock for weeks.

“Most time it is not the depot owners that hike the price, but the marketers struggling to outplay each other at the depots,” the source stated.

Our correspondent learnt that some individuals who act as middlemen between the depots and the filling stations sell to the highest bidders only, leaving out those who could not afford the bidding.

These middlemen, it was learnt, make profits just by negotiating prices with the filling stations through phone calls.

Meanwhile, another depot source told our correspondent that loading of fuel has improved during the weekend, expressing optimism that things would improve this week.

“Loading was better over the weekend. It is expected that the supply will get better. We loaded from Saturday till Sunday. We are hopeful the fuel situation will improve this week,” the source disclosed.

However, our correspondent reports that the purported improved loading of fuel has not been felt by Nigerians who still pay higher rates to buy fuel.

Findings by The PUNCH showed that the cost of transportation had risen by almost 40 per cent, depending on the destination.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

Alleged 76bn, $31.5m Fraud: EFCC Arraigns Ex AMCON MD, Ahmed Kuru, Four Others in Lagos

Published

on

By

 

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, 20 January, 2025 arraigned a former Managing Director of Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria AMCON, Ahmed Kuru and four others for allegedly defrauding Arik Airline N76 billion and $31.5 million, respectively.

 

Other defendants are former Receiver Manager of Arik Airline Ltd, Kamilu Omokide, Chief Executive Officer of the airline, Captain Roy Ilegbodu, and Super Bravo Ltd and Union Bank PLC.

 

The defendants were arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos on a six-count charge bordering on theft, abuse of office and stealing by dishonestly taking the property of another.

 

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to all the six-count charges when they were read to them.

 

Count one reads: “That you, Union Bank Nigeria Plc, sometime in 2011 or thereabouts, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, with the intention of causing and/or inducing unwarranted sale of Arik Air loans and bank guarantees with Union Bank, made false statements to the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), regarding Arik Air Limited’s performing loans, following which you transferred a bogus figure of N71,000,000,000.00 (Seventy-One Billion Naira) to AMCON.”

 

Count two reads: “That you, Ahmed Lawal Kuru, Kamilu Alaba Omokide as Receiver Manager of Arik Air Limited, and Captain Roy Ilegbodu, Chief Executive Officer of Arik Air Limited in Receivership, sometime in 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, fraudulently converted to the use of NG Eagle Limited the total sum of N4,900,000,000.00 (Four Billion Nine Hundred Million Naira only), property of Arik Air Limited”.

 

Count five reads: “That you, Kamilu Alaba Omokide, Ahmed Lawal Kuru and Capt. Roy Ilegbodu, on the 12th day of February, 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, being public officers, directed to be done in abuse of the authority of your office and with intention of obtaining undue advantage for yourself and cronies an arbitrary act, to wit: intentionally authorizing the tear down and destruction of 5N-JEA with Serial No. 15058 valued at $31.5million (Thirty One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars), an arbitrary act, which act is prejudicial to the economic stability of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Arik Air Limited”.

 

The counsel to the first and third defendants, Prof Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, informed the court of a motion for bail application dated November 28, 2024 and November 29, 2024 for the two defendants.

 

Osipitan prayed the court that the defendants be granted bail on liberal terms.  According to him, the first defendant had no criminal records and that the EFCC granted him administration bail  which he didn’t jump.  “We pray the court grants bail to the two defendants on the same liberal terms given to them by EFCC,” he said.

 

EFCC Counsel, Wahab Shittu SAN, filed counter-affidavits dated December 2, 2024 against the first defendant and also another counter affidavits dated December 22, 2024 against the third defendant.  Shittu prayed the court to dismiss their bail applications.

 

According to him, the two defendants are facing serious offences of economic sabotage. However, he agreed with the second and third defence counsel that they are presumed innocent pending the determination of the court. Shittu , however, added that the temptation of the defendants leaving the country was very high. He thereafter prayed that accelerated hearing be granted and the defendants’ international passports be seized by the court.

 

“But if my lord decides to be magnanimous to grant them bail, we shall be praying for stringent conditions because we are particular about their attendance in court. “We urge that they should submit their international passports with the court in order to ensure that they come for trial,” he said.

 

The counsel to the second defendant, Olasupo Shasore, SAN in his motion for bail dated December 6, 2024 and filed on the same day, urged the court to also grant bail to his client on self recognition.

 

The prosecuting counsel in his counter affidavits dated January 17, 2025, opposed the bail application of the second defendant.

 

He said the application for bail was incompetent and should be struck out. Shittu cited relevance laws to buttress his argument. “My lord, the record of this court is to the effect that the second defendant, at one point, absconded in which your lordship had to issue a bench warrant. “The learned silk for the second defendant is not the defendant on trial and it is very unhealthy for a counsel to stand as a surety for a defendant.

 

“I urge my lord, in exercising his discretion, to take all this into consideration because our concern is the appearance of the second defendant in court so that he does not abscond.”

 

After listening to the arguments from all the parties, Justice Dada granted bail to the defendants in the sum of N20 million Naira each with two sureties in like sum.   The sureties must be gainfully employed and deposed to means of identification.

 

She also directed that the defendants must submit their international passports with the registrar of the court.

 

Justice Dada adjourned the matter till March 17, 18, and 19, 2025 for commencement of trial.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

Trending