Connect with us

News and Report

Qatar seals LNG deals Nigeria once sought

Published

on

Qatar is courting foreign investors to expand its gas expansion project, and the energy companies falling over themselves are the same ones that turned their nose up at Nigeria’s invitation to invest in its liquefied natural gas (LNG) plants.

BusinessDay findings showed Qatar is already one of the world’s largest suppliers of LNG — gas cooled into liquid form so that it can be piped onto ships for export – and it is making plans to further increase its LNG production capacity following the discovery of vast new gas reserves.

Qatar announced new plans to expand output from the world’s biggest natural gas field, saying it will boost capacity to 142 million tonnes per annum (mtpa) before 2030, according to Saad Sherida al-Kaabi, Qatar’s energy minister.

The new North Field expansion, named North Field West, will add a further 16 million tonnes of LNG per year to existing expansion plans, Sherida al-Kaabi said at a news conference on Sunday.

Meanwhile, Nigeria LNG Limited (NLNG), owned by the federal government of Nigeria and three international oil companies, has been on force majeure for more than 15 months.

“Recent studies have shown that the North Field contains huge additional gas quantities estimated at 240 trillion cubic feet, which raises the state of Qatar’s gas reserves from 1,760 [trillion cubic feet] to more than 2,000 trillion cubic feet,” said al-Kaabi, who also heads the state-owned company QatarEnergy.

These results “will enable us to begin developing a new LNG project from the North Field’s western sector with a production capacity of about 16 million tonnes per annum”, he said.

This will bring Qatar’s production capacity to 142 million tonnes once “the new expansion is completed before the end of this decade” – a nearly 85 percent rise from current production levels, al-Kaabi added.

The QatarEnergy chief said the firm will “immediately commence” with engineering works to ensure the expansion is completed on time.

BusinessDay’s findings showed ExxonMobil has pumped nearly $30 billion into gas projects in Qatar within long-term partnership agreements.

The US oil giant ExxonMobil has pumped nearly $30 billion into gas projects in Qatar within long-term partnership agreements, its Senior Vice President has said.

According to Peter Clarke, ExxonMobil’s senior vice president, the oil giant began investing in Qatar’s gas projects during the 1990s and that it has contributed to the development of 12 of the 14 gas facilities in the Gulf country.

“We have also invested in 27 LNG vessels to transport Qatari gas…over the past years, we have invested nearly $30 billion in major projects in Qatar…we also have important ventures with Qatar in the US, mainly Golden Pass Terminal,” Clarke told the Qatari Arabic language daily Asharq in an interview.

Contrast this with Nigeria where investors have largely been unimpressed with overtures to build new liquefaction plants.

The NLNG has seen its output decline owing to gas supply constraints, which also pose a threat to its expansion plan.

It had on October 17, 2022 declared a force majeure on product supplies from its production facilities on Bonny Island, following the declaration of force majeure by all its upstream gas suppliers.

Since the development of the NLNG, new projects have been too few and far between. e Two LNG projects in Nigeria: Olokola LNG and Brass LNG have been unable to reach a final decision by the stakeholders as investors have pulled out.

The OK LNG project was stalled because all the international oil companies (BG, Shell and Chevron) withdrew from the project, with only the Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) left.

The Brass LNG project, which was designed to produce 10 million metric tonnes per annum, was to be built by the NNPC, Total, ConocoPhillips and Eni Group. But ConocoPhillips withdrew from the project in 2013 and has stalled since then.

“As we move into the early 2030s, there’s going be huge demand for gas from Asia, and I think QatarEnergy is squarely focused on that,” said Tom Marzec-Manser, head of gas analytics at commodity pricing and data company ICIS. Qatar has secured two huge gas supply deals with China over the past 15 months.

Last June, it agreed to sell 4mn tonnes a year of LNG to China National Petroleum Corporation for 27 years, following a similar deal with China’s Sinopec in November 2022.

Qatar’s LNG ramp-up comes amid growing demand for gas, which is set to grow by 2.5 percent, or 100 Bcm (3531 Bcf) in 2024, the International Energy agency said in its gas market report for Q1 2024.

Qatar accounted for 20 percent of LNG volumes in 2023, the Paris-based agency said in the report.

“In particular, the United States and Qatar have been driving this trend, accounting for 34 percent and 26 percent of all contracted volumes in 2023 respectively. Considering only post-FID (final investment decision) projects, these countries’ share was 21 percent and 39 percent,” the IEA said.

It is this kind of critical thinking and rigour that is absent in Nigeria’s policy formulation and execution which is scaring away investors.

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

FG sues MultiChoice, CEO over DStv, GOtv price hike

Published

on

By

 

The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) has filed charges against MultiChoice Nigeria and its CEO, John Ugbe, for allegedly breaching regulatory directives and hindering an ongoing investigation.

 

A statement issued on Wednesday by Ondaja Ijagwu, FCCPC’s Director of Corporate Affairs, revealed that the charges stem from MultiChoice’s decision to increase subscription rates for its DStv and GOtv packages despite an explicit directive from the commission to suspend the hike.

 

On February 24, MultiChoice officially announced a subscription price increase set to take effect on March 1. This move, coming almost a year after the previous price hike, triggered public backlash, prompting the FCCPC to intervene. In response, the commission instructed Ugbe to appear for an investigative hearing on February 27 to discuss the price increase.

 

 

Despite this directive, MultiChoice proceeded with the hike as scheduled, prompting the FCCPC to take legal action.

 

The commission has filed charges against the company and its CEO at the Federal High Court in Lagos, citing three counts of violations under the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act (FCCPA) of 2018. These charges include: Obstructing the Commission’s Inquiry by implementing the price increase against regulatory orders (Section 33(4)). Impeding the Investigation by disregarding the suspension order (Section 110). Misleading the Commission by going ahead with the increase without proper clearance (Section 159(2).

 

The FCCPC emphasized that MultiChoice’s actions amounted to a deliberate attempt to undermine regulatory authority and disrupt fair competition. By implementing the price hike ahead of the March 6 hearing, the commission argued, MultiChoice not only defied regulatory processes but also violated consumer rights and fair market practices.

 

 

In addition to the legal charges, the FCCPC is exploring further enforcement actions, including sanctions and penalties, to ensure that MultiChoice complies with regulations and maintains accountability.

 

The commission reiterated its commitment to protecting Nigerian consumers from exploitative business practices, asserting that it would continue to enforce fair market principles and ensure legal compliance among dominant market players.

 

 

Continue Reading

News and Report

Court orders seizure of N1.37bn Kaduna fund ‘hidden’ in Sterling Bank

Published

on

By

 

 

A Federal High Court in Kaduna has ordered the interim forfeiture of N1.37 billion Kaduna State fund allegedly hidden in a Sterling Bank account with no proper documentation,.

 

The judge, H. Buhari, issued the forfeiture order on February 28, following an ex parte application by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC), which had previously filed the motion on February 14.

 

The fund was said to have been misappropriated from the Kaduna State Government’s coffers during the tenure of former Governor Nasir El-Rufai.

 

 

According to the ICPC, the fund, originally allocated for light rail project was diverted during El-Rufai’s administration. The controversial transfer was uncovered after the ICPC traced the funds to a private account.

 

According to the anti-graft agency, the diverted money was funneled through Indo Kaduna MRTS JV Nig. Ltd, a joint venture formed in 2016 between the Kaduna State Government and Indian investors.

 

ICPC’s lawyer, E.O. Akponimisingha, represented the agency during the hearing, which was conducted without the presence of any opposing parties.

 

 

In granting the forfeiture, the court ordered the ICPC to publish a public notice in two national newspapers, inviting anyone with a legitimate claim to the funds to present their case in court. Further proceedings have been scheduled for April 8, 2025.

 

The scandal dates back to December 2016 when, despite the Indo Kaduna MRTS JV Nig. Ltd not being formally incorporated until May 2017, Governor El-Rufai approved payments to the company. Between December 2016 and January 2017, a total of N11.1 billion was transferred to the company’s Sterling Bank account. The ICPC’s investigation revealed that N1.37 billion of this sum was illegally diverted into a private account.

 

In justifying the forfeiture, the ICPC emphasized that the redirection of the funds into public projects aligns with the broader public interest, particularly in enhancing governance and accountability. The commission further asserted that this action would not violate any constitutional rights and would instead serve the greater good by recovering the misappropriated funds.

 

 

The investigation was launched after a petition was filed by lawyer M. Yahaya from NUS’ AB Chambers in Abuja, detailing concerns of severe financial mismanagement during El-Rufai’s administration. Other officials from the former governor’s administration are also facing allegations of fraud and corruption, with some already facing charges before various tribunals and anti-corruption bodies.

 

While the former governor and his associates maintain their innocence, calling the ICPC’s actions “oppression” and an “abuse of power,” they argue that the seizure of funds tied to the light rail project could harm foreign investments in the state.

 

The case is ongoing, and further developments are expected following the adjournment to April 8.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

News and Report

Court Stops Senate Committee From Probing Natasha Akpoti.

Published

on

By

 

The federal high court in Abuja has issued an order preventing the senate committee on ethics, privileges, and public petitions from proceeding with disciplinary actions against Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan.

 

Obiora Egwuatu, the presiding judge, granted the order on Tuesday following an ex parte application submitted by Akpoti-Uduaghan’s legal representatives, the senator representing Kogi central.

 

 

Akpoti-Uduaghan was summoned to appear before the senate’s disciplinary committee after a confrontation with Senate President Godswill Akpabio on February 20.

 

 

The senator disrupted plenary proceedings by rejecting her designated seat, disregarding Akpabio’s directive, and persistently raising a point of order despite being overruled.

 

The senate later referred Akpoti-Uduaghan to the committee on ethics, privileges, and public petitions for a disciplinary review.

 

On February 28, during an interview on Arise TV, the senator claimed that her ordeal in the senate started after she rejected “sexual advances from the senate president”.

 

NULL AND VOID’

 

The legal team representing Akpoti-Uduaghan includes Sanusi Musa, M. J. Numa, Y. M. Zakari, B. J. Tabai, Tijanni Jimol, and M. C. Bekee.

 

The defendants in the suit are clerk of the national assembly, the senate, senate president, and chairman of the senate committee on ethics.

 

According to court documents obtained by TheCable, Akpoti-Uduaghan requested the court to issue an order stopping the senate and the ethics committee from “proceeding with the purported investigation” against her.

 

She further asked the court to declare that any action taken during the pendency of the suit is “null, void and of no effect whatsoever”.

 

 

Additionally, Akpoti-Uduaghan sought permission for the defendants to be served with the originating summons and related documents through substituted means.

 

 

“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT granting an Interim Injunction restraining the 2nd Defendant/Defendant’s Committee on Ethics, Privileges and Code of Conduct headed by the 4th Defendant from proceeding with the purported investigation against the Plaintiff/Applicant for alleged misconduct sequel to the events that occurred at the plenary of the 2nd Defendant on the 20th day of February, 2025, pursuant to the referral by the 2nd Defendant on 25th February, 2025 pending the hearing and determination of the Motion on Notice for interlocutory injunction,” part of the application reads.

 

In his ruling, the judge directed the defendants to show cause within 72 hours after being served with the order, explaining why an interlocutory injunction should not be granted against them.

 

Egwuatu also approved the request for substituted service on the defendants.

 

The case was adjourned to March 10 for the defendants to present their case on why the applicant’s reliefs should

not be granted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continue Reading

Trending