Connect with us

News and Report

Revealed: Auditor-General exposes irregular payments at law reform commission…

Published

on

The Office of the Auditor-General of the Federation (OAuGF) has exposed different forms of “irregular” payments of salaries and allowances to officials of the Nigerian Law Reform Commission (NLRC).

The revelation highlights how public funds easily leak into private pockets through seemingly legitimate channels.

The NLRC, established in July 1979, is saddled with the responsibility of developing Nigerian laws and leading the push for the reform of outdated federal laws.

But the agency, which is under the supervision of the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, has been relegated to the background in the law reform efforts of the country, with its inefficiency often blamed on underfunding.

In an inspection audit carried out last year, the auditor-general identified almost N18 million expended as unearned and irregular salaries and allowances in violation of extant rules, according to a copy of the report of the exercise obtained by PREMIUM TIMES.

The findings of the OAugF followed an inspection of the Capital Vote, Overhead and Personnel Account books of the commission for 2021.

PREMIUM TIMES understands that the inspection is carried out annually across the federal government’s ministries, departments and agencies in line with the provision of section 85 of the Nigerian constitution.

This newspaper obtained a copy of the OAuGF’s audit inspection report dated 26 October 2022 and addressed to the chair of the NLRC, demanding explanations as well as recovery of funds considered to have been spent in violation of laws and regulations.

The inspection report by the auditor-general, accompanied by a cover letter signed by A. M Gandu, the OAuGF’s Director of the Judiciary Audit Department, spotlighted, among others, “Irregular payments of out-of-pocket allowance amounting to N4,045,000”.

It also exposed over N2 million unearned salary paid to an official and “payments not settled within the financial year” to the tune of over N11 million.

The irregular payments, based on the copy of the inspection report seen by this newspaper, totalled N17,949,092.12.

The figure is a little over 3 per cent of the agency’s total budget of N525,116,536 and almost 5 per cent of the N360,976,885 personnel budget for the year under reference.

The leakage might weigh more on the finances of the commission, given the claim by some of its officials that only an average of 70 per cent of its budget is cash-backed annually.

The auditor-general report, however indicates that whether small or big, the expenses are pointers to systemic risks – how funds can be easily lost or misapplied, laws are wantonly disregarded, poor budgetary control erodes accountability, and internal connivance aids self-enrichment schemes in government circles.

Auditor-General queries N4 million out-of-pocket allowance:

Details of the irregular payments spotlighted in the OAuGF’s inspection report include over N4 million paid to some unidentified officers of the commission as “out-of-pocket” expenses.

Out-of-pocket expenses are incurred by officials using their personal money to pay for something on behalf of the government in the hope of being reimbursed.

The OAuGF’s report said a total of N4,045,000 paid out as out-of-pocket expenses were captured in 20 vouchers examined during the annual inspection.

The expenses, according to the inspectors, violated extant rules that prohibit public servants from receiving sitting allowances for holding day-to-day meetings.

Citing the National Salaries, Income and Wages Commission’s circular with reference number SWC/S/04/s.310/65 dated 8 April 2016, the AuGF also noted that “Chief Executive Officers and other public servants on monthly salaries who are board members in their own establishments are not entitled to sitting allowance.”

“Before the claim of out-of-pocket, there should have been a prior application and approval from the officer to expend on behalf of the government before a refund,” the report said.

It explained further that the over N4 million paid out as out-of-pocket payment claims “cannot be accepted as a regular charge on public funds”.

According to the report, the payments do not just constitute a “loss of public fund” but also raise concerns about the risks of “frivolous claims without actual expenses”.

It, therefore, recommended that the agency forward “all prior requests and approvals for OPE (out-of-pocket) claims of all the officers involved.

It also recommended that the agency recover “various sums from individuals as irregular payments and forward recovery particulars for my confirmation.”

N2.7 million unearned salaries
Apart from the irregular out-of-pocket expenses, the report also exposed how an unearned N2.7 million was paid to an official in 2021.

According to the report, a review of the pay slips of the official, Chukwu Collins, showed that he was appointed on 17 March 2021, but by the time he received his salary arrears eight months later in November, the payment stretched backwards to cover the two months and first half of March preceding his date of employment.

The report said out of the total N5,782,731.42 paid to him, a total of N2,747,943.12 covering the period preceding his employment was “unearned”.

It stated that the payment violated the extant rules prohibiting an employee from receiving salaries he or she has not worked for.

“The officer did not work for the above months. Therefore, arrears paid are unearned and must be refunded while March salary should be prorated on actual days worked,” the report declared.

The report added that the flagged payments showed that there was a “possibility of connivance with staff of the human resources department that are responsible for inputting salary data”.

The auditor-general report recommended to the NLRC to “recover the sum of N2, 747,943.12 from Mr Collins, including evidence that March salary was prorated”.

More so, the evidence of recovery should be forwarded to the OAuGF office for confirmation, the report added.

N11 million paid without revalidation
The OAuGF report also flagged 38 payment vouchers amounting to over N11 million paid out in violation of Financial Regulations (2009) on services rendered within the financial year.

According to the report, N11,156,149 was paid to “various contractors, as staff DTA (Duty Tour Allowances), out-of-pocket expenses, etc., after the financial year in which the services were rendered without revalidation”.

“This act contravened the Financial Regulations and extant rules which aimed at ensuring effective budgetary control on annual estimates for specific years in the budget,” the report added.

It explained that by virtue of Financial Regulations 2906(ii), “payments that are not provided for in the annual estimates shall not be accepted.”

It noted that such payments after the financial year could lead to distortion of budgetary control, heightening the risks of misapplication of funds.

Other risks in such an act, according to the report, are that “it portends a danger of breaching applicable laws, ” “possibility of duplicating payments”, and “payment of liability without appropriated budgets.”

The report, therefore, recommended the agency to make a comment on the violation of extant regulations as regards expenditure clarification and control.

It added that all expenditures which were incorrectly charged to a vote would be disallowed.

Responses to auditor-general
Interviews with officials of the NLRC show that the commission accepted the verdict of the auditor-general’s office on the payment of over N2 million unearned salaries to an individual.

But the agency contested the report’s recommendations on the two other matters of N4 million out-of-pocket expenses and the N11 million payments made after the financial year it was meant for.

The Deputy Director of Accounts and Finance, Abdulsalam Tijani, told PREMIUM TIMES that the commission had started the deduction of the over N2 million unearned salary from the affected official.

But he defended the commission concerning the other issues.

He said N4 million out-of-pocket expenses were paid to officials who attended training using their personal resources.

On the N11 million payments not settled within the financial year, he said this happened because some expenses of the agency were carried over to the following year as a result of the government’s delay in releasing funds.

He said the agency was under obligation to pay back officials who spent personal money to execute tasks assigned to them in as much as it was within the stipulated amount.

The chair of the commission, Jummai Audi, similarly confirmed that the commission had started recouping the unearned salaries through monthly deductions from Mr Collins’ salaries beginning in November 2022.

Mrs Audi corroborated Mr Tijani on the N4 million and N11 million payments but admitted that there ought to be a revalidation that was not done.

“We did not pay the staff because releases were not made at the due time,” she said, explaining why the N11 million expenses were carried over to the following year.

She said she had written back to the auditor-general office explaining the actions the commission had taken concerning the payment of the unearned salaries and clarifying the two other issues raised in the audit report.

On his part, Mr Collins, a Commissioner at the commission, confirmed that the deduction from his salary, which started on 22 November 2022, would run for 24 months.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

Alleged 76bn, $31.5m Fraud: EFCC Arraigns Ex AMCON MD, Ahmed Kuru, Four Others in Lagos

Published

on

By

 

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) on Monday, 20 January, 2025 arraigned a former Managing Director of Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria AMCON, Ahmed Kuru and four others for allegedly defrauding Arik Airline N76 billion and $31.5 million, respectively.

 

Other defendants are former Receiver Manager of Arik Airline Ltd, Kamilu Omokide, Chief Executive Officer of the airline, Captain Roy Ilegbodu, and Super Bravo Ltd and Union Bank PLC.

 

The defendants were arraigned before Justice Mojisola Dada of the Special Offences Court sitting in Ikeja, Lagos on a six-count charge bordering on theft, abuse of office and stealing by dishonestly taking the property of another.

 

The defendants, however, pleaded not guilty to all the six-count charges when they were read to them.

 

Count one reads: “That you, Union Bank Nigeria Plc, sometime in 2011 or thereabouts, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, with the intention of causing and/or inducing unwarranted sale of Arik Air loans and bank guarantees with Union Bank, made false statements to the Assets Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON), regarding Arik Air Limited’s performing loans, following which you transferred a bogus figure of N71,000,000,000.00 (Seventy-One Billion Naira) to AMCON.”

 

Count two reads: “That you, Ahmed Lawal Kuru, Kamilu Alaba Omokide as Receiver Manager of Arik Air Limited, and Captain Roy Ilegbodu, Chief Executive Officer of Arik Air Limited in Receivership, sometime in 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, fraudulently converted to the use of NG Eagle Limited the total sum of N4,900,000,000.00 (Four Billion Nine Hundred Million Naira only), property of Arik Air Limited”.

 

Count five reads: “That you, Kamilu Alaba Omokide, Ahmed Lawal Kuru and Capt. Roy Ilegbodu, on the 12th day of February, 2022 or thereabout, in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, being public officers, directed to be done in abuse of the authority of your office and with intention of obtaining undue advantage for yourself and cronies an arbitrary act, to wit: intentionally authorizing the tear down and destruction of 5N-JEA with Serial No. 15058 valued at $31.5million (Thirty One Million, Five Hundred Thousand Dollars), an arbitrary act, which act is prejudicial to the economic stability of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and Arik Air Limited”.

 

The counsel to the first and third defendants, Prof Taiwo Osipitan, SAN, informed the court of a motion for bail application dated November 28, 2024 and November 29, 2024 for the two defendants.

 

Osipitan prayed the court that the defendants be granted bail on liberal terms.  According to him, the first defendant had no criminal records and that the EFCC granted him administration bail  which he didn’t jump.  “We pray the court grants bail to the two defendants on the same liberal terms given to them by EFCC,” he said.

 

EFCC Counsel, Wahab Shittu SAN, filed counter-affidavits dated December 2, 2024 against the first defendant and also another counter affidavits dated December 22, 2024 against the third defendant.  Shittu prayed the court to dismiss their bail applications.

 

According to him, the two defendants are facing serious offences of economic sabotage. However, he agreed with the second and third defence counsel that they are presumed innocent pending the determination of the court. Shittu , however, added that the temptation of the defendants leaving the country was very high. He thereafter prayed that accelerated hearing be granted and the defendants’ international passports be seized by the court.

 

“But if my lord decides to be magnanimous to grant them bail, we shall be praying for stringent conditions because we are particular about their attendance in court. “We urge that they should submit their international passports with the court in order to ensure that they come for trial,” he said.

 

The counsel to the second defendant, Olasupo Shasore, SAN in his motion for bail dated December 6, 2024 and filed on the same day, urged the court to also grant bail to his client on self recognition.

 

The prosecuting counsel in his counter affidavits dated January 17, 2025, opposed the bail application of the second defendant.

 

He said the application for bail was incompetent and should be struck out. Shittu cited relevance laws to buttress his argument. “My lord, the record of this court is to the effect that the second defendant, at one point, absconded in which your lordship had to issue a bench warrant. “The learned silk for the second defendant is not the defendant on trial and it is very unhealthy for a counsel to stand as a surety for a defendant.

 

“I urge my lord, in exercising his discretion, to take all this into consideration because our concern is the appearance of the second defendant in court so that he does not abscond.”

 

After listening to the arguments from all the parties, Justice Dada granted bail to the defendants in the sum of N20 million Naira each with two sureties in like sum.   The sureties must be gainfully employed and deposed to means of identification.

 

She also directed that the defendants must submit their international passports with the registrar of the court.

 

Justice Dada adjourned the matter till March 17, 18, and 19, 2025 for commencement of trial.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

Trending