Connect with us

Interview

Scrapping SARS ‘ll lead to Anarchy, says Alhaji Balogun

Published

on

The campaign for disbandment of the Special Ant-Robbery Squad, (SARS) of the Nigeria Police Force has been on for the past few weeks because of the operatives’ complicity, excesses and sometimes unprofessional activities. Alhaji Olayinka Balogun, a lawyer who retired in 2012 in Benin, Edo State as Commissioner of Police, in this interview with BIYI ADEG0ROYE, gives retrospective dimension to the matter and offers some suggestions

What is the historical basis for the establishment of the Special Anti Robbery Squad?
Following the end of the Nigerian Civil war, there was an increase in armed robbery and other violent crimes due to proliferation of arms. So the political leadership and the police hierarchy saw the need to set up a special force to address the situation. Don’t forget that even as at then the various police commands already had their respective Anti-Robbery Section at the State Criminal Investigations Departments (SCIDs). In those days, those ones just came around to handle such cases because the level was not sophisticated for them to move out. They were placed under the Commissioner of Police as at then and expectedly, they made a lot of inroads into anti-robbery operations. Of course, you can remember what happened in Lagos during Col. Buba Marwa’s time, and the successes recorded gives further justification for the existence of the squad. And it went on like that such that it became a very big organization fighting mainly armed robbery and other major violent crimes.

In other words, you recognize that SARS played a major role in handling violent crimes?
Yes, there is no doubt about that, and that informed its formation in the first place.

How then do you see the call for the disbandment of SARS, on the grounds of murder, torture and human rights abuses?
Well, it is a reaction to the excesses of some of SARS operatives like murder and those infractions you have mentioned. But the issue of scrapping it does not arise at all. We cannot scrap SARS because of the excesses of a handful of operatives. All that is required is to ensure adequate monitoring and checks. Operatives of SARS have a lot of powers and mind you, they are trained to engage armed robbers. So all that is required is to ensure they operate within the ambit of the law.
One point that must be recognized is that SARS is a special wing of the police made up of brave, volunteer police officers. Only very brave and daring officers move to SARS. A lot of them lose their lives there, leaving their dependants behind. Hence, it is a place for very loyal and serious- minded officers. If, by any chance, some miscreants find their way into the squad, that must be dealt with.
One of the things we need to do is to appoint officers with integrity, respect for law and human rights, officers that are ready to work as head of SARS in each of the SCIDs. Then we need to weed out the bad eggs there, and those who have over-stayed, because actually a number of them have stayed there for four, five, six years or more. They are no longer useful there. Some of them even have the wrong motive for going there – for material benefits or whatever they can acquire. Some of them are really bad; there is no doubt about that.
But that is no sufficient reason for calling its scrapping. It is like saying we should scrap the police – or that we should scrap the Nigeria Customs Service, because some officers there are corrupt or sorts. You can imagine the far-reaching consequences that will come with that. Even among journalists, we have good ones and bad ones as well. Even in the family, we have various types of people and do you disown such people because you want to address a problem? What we need to do is to reorganize the place and inject new hands.

I am aware there are some departments in the police that serve as internal control mechanism?
Look, unlike other organizations, the police have its internal cleansing system. There is the anti-corruption unit like the X-Squad. For instance, at the divisional level, if a policeman errs, the DPO takes action and ensures that he is tried orderly room and appropriate action is taken within a week. The same thing is applicable to men of the anti-robbery section. The Commissioner of Police and the Provost are there to handle that. That is the way it is in all formations in the Force. So if bold and professional officers are given the headship of the place things will improve.

A few days ago, 30 SARS members were reportedly arrested for extortion and sundry crimes. Do you see this as one of the measures to clean up the place?
It is one of the efforts to clean up the place no doubt, except that I see that as an unnecessary fire brigade approach. We want to avoid playing to the gallery. I want a situation where there is result-oriented, sustained efforts to ensure sanity in SARS. I was Deputy Commissioner at SCID, Panti in Lagos and what we had to avoid was this issue of abuse. A situation where complainant will leave Police Division, Area Command to take a case of fraud to SARS and they accept it for investigation? That to me is an absurdity. It is not in their purview at all. Sometimes, you see them arresting people in the night; you see SARS men forcing themselves into people’s homes at midnight, and at the end of the day you will discover that they were there to arrest somebody over issuance of dud cheque! What is their business with that? Ironically, a lot of them do this because of monetary benefits and all that, thereby giving the force a bad name. All those policemen are the ones giving the police a bad name.
When those types of complaints come up the IGP and Commissioners of Police should act promptly to address them. When a child errs, do you wait for somebody else before you take action? You don’t even wait for his mother, before you spank the child immediately. In as much as I don’t mind the current protest, I want to say that these are things that have been happening over time and built up to this moment.
As a practising lawyer and a retired Commissioner of Police, I want to say that a situation where SARS operatives handle cases of debt recovery of as low as N500,000 or N1 million, which are outside their purview, or are reprehensible in human rights violations. I find that very repugnant. It is like a case of PMF. You don’t see a mobile policeman until issues get out of hand. Regular policeman will go about his general duty stuff, but when you call a Mopol, you know the situation has changed. That is the case with SARS. When SARS people step into a matter, you know it is a major one. I remember the days of Uwaneroro; Amusa Bello and so many of them like that who made their names in the police as anti-robbery officers.
So my position is that this re-organisation should be sustained, rather than being a flash-in-the- pan thing that will be abandoned after all these reactions must have died down. Now, I must add that Nigerians should be very courageous too in handling the SARS thing. When they come to their houses, they must be ready to ask questions and put up some resistance. Ask him: ‘do I look like a robber? I‘m afraid, I cannot follow you. Can you call your DPO? Can I speak with your Area Commander? I’m not following you.’ Nigerians should be bold to do so.
I can send you some complaint messages from the public. Look, anti-robbery people don’t invite people. Do you invite killers? Rather they respond to robbery operations and investigate same. They don’t sit in their offices and invite suspects. To come and do what? That is because of the fierce nature of their operation – confronting armed robbers.

What do you make of situations where some SARS people are working for politicians like it happened in Rivers State during the last elections?
It is not possible to say that SARS operatives are working for politicians. The issue is that any policeman posted to any state command is supposed to be working for the state government. You know that the state government is personified by the state governor; everything the Commissioner of Police in the state requires to fight crime comes from the state governor. How many Armoured Personnel Carriers are coming from the Force Headquarters? How many patrol vehicles are coming from Force Head Quarters? For that reason, there must be some rapport between the Commissioner of Police, members of SARS and the government. If there is a serious robbery incident in a state for instance, the first person the Commissioner will report to after informing the IGP is the governor, especially if it involved a very prominent person and so on. It is that rapport that the opponents are blowing out of proportion.

Did you read the INEC report that indicted the Officer in Charge of SARS during the election held in Rivers State last year?
Yes, I read the report, but was that the full report? Have you heard from the policemen? When you indict somebody, it means you accuse him of an offence and that does not make it true. It is either the IGP investigates or the state government does before it can be authenticated. By and large, SARS operatives and officers must exhibit high degree of professionalism wherever they are sent to serve. I must also tell you that are some cases, some governors tell the IGP to deploy a particular officer to his state- that this is the person he wants to work with. If the relationship goes on fine, good, if not there will be problem.
What I am saying as a retired Commissioner of Police who had worked with many IGPs and some governors is that there must be some bad elements in the force, but what is most important is the leadership which must ensure that the bad ones are either reformed or flushed out no matter where he comes from.

Interview

Alleged Forgery: EFCC Set To Arraign Oba Otudeko, Ex-First Bank MD Bisi Onasanya For N12.3Bn Fraud

Published

on

By

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke of the Federal High Court in Lagos has fixed Monday, January 20, 2025, for the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to arraign the Chairman of Honeywell Group, Chief Oba Otudeko and a former First Bank Managing Director Stephen Olabisi Onasanya for allegedly looting N12.3billion naira from First Bank.
Otudeko – former Chairman of First Bank of Nigeria, FBN Holdings – and Onasanya are to be arraigned alongside a former board member of Honeywell Soji Akintayo and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Limited connected to Otudeko.
According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, N6.2bbillion and N2.09 Billion between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.
The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel Bilikisu Buhari on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants made and uttered forged documents to deceive the bank.
Otudeko, Onasanya, Akintayo and Anchorage will be brought before Justice Aneke, to whom the case, registered as FHC/L/20C/2025, has been assigned.
Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”
In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about the 26th day of November 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”
The 3rd count claimed that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2 Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”
In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6,15 Billion, out of the monies.
According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and are punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.
Counts 5 and 6 read: “That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO, STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA, SOJI AKINTAYO AND ANCHORAGE LEISURE LIMITED on or about 11th day of December 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1,5 Billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.
“That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO, STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA, SOJI AKINTAYO, AND ANCHORAGE LEISURE LIMITED on or about the 17th day of December 2013 in Lagos, converted to the use of Honeywell Flour Mills Plc the sum of N500 Million Naira Only which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 15(2 (b)) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”
Other charges are as follows:
“Count 7. That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO, STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA, SOJI AKINTAYO AND ANCHORAGE LEISURE LIMITED on or about the 3rd day of September 2013 in Lagos and within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court conspired amongst yourselves to commit an offence to wit: uttering a forged document – titled “Letter of Application” with the intent that it may be used by the First Bank in the belief that the said document is genuine and emanated from V-Tech Links Dynamic Limited, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 3(6) of the MISCELLANEOUS OFFENCES ACT, Cap M17 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 and punishable under Section 1(2)(c) of same Act.
“COUNT 8: That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO, STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA, SOJI AKINTAYO AND ANCHORAGE LEISURE LIMITED on or about the 3rd day of September 2013 in Lagos and within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court uttered a forged document titled “Letter of Application” with intent that it may be used by the First Bank in the belief that the said document is genuine and emanated from V-Tech Dynamic Links Limited, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1(2)(c) of the MISCELLANEOUS OFFENCES ACT, Cap M17 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 and punishable under same Act.
“COUNT 9 That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO, STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA, SOJI AKINTAYO AND ANCHORAGE LEISURE LIMITED on or about the 3rd day of September 2013 in Lagos and within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court conspired amongst yourselves to commit an offence to wit: making false document titled “AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE INVESTMENT CERTIFICATE TO FIRST BANK” with intent that it may be used by First Bank in the belief that the said document is genuine and emanated from V-Tech Links Dynamic Limited, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 3(6) of the MISCELLANEOUS OFFENCES ACT, Cap M17 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 and punishable under Section 1(2)(c) of same Act.
“COUNT 10: That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO, STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA, SOJI AKINTAYO AND ANCHORAGE LEISURE LIMITED on or about the 3rd day of September 2013, in Lagos and within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court made a forged document titled “AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE INVESTMENT CERTIFICATE TO FIRST BANK” with Intent that it may be used by the First Bank in the belief that the said document is genuine and emanated from V-Tech Links Dynamic Limited, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1(2) (c) of the MISCELLANEOUS OFFENCES ACT, Cap M17 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 and punishable under same Act.
“COUNT 11: That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO AND STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA on or about the 31st day of October 2014 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court procured Abiodun Olatunji and Raymond Eze to transfer the sum of N6,200,000,000 (Six Billion, Two Hundred Million Naira Only), to STALLION NIGERIA LIMITED’s account number “2015708429” domiciled with First Bank, which sum you reasonably ought to have known formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities to wit: Fraudulent False Accounting and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Sections 18 (c) and 15(2 (b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.
“COUNT 12: That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO AND STEPHEN OLABISI ONASANYA on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court procured Abiodun Olatunji and Raymond Eze to transfer the sum of N2, 090, 000,000 (Two Billion, Ninety Million Naira Only), from STALLION NIGERIA LIMITED’s account number “2015708429” domiciled with First bank, to Emmerado Logistics Limited’s account number “0688985010” domiciled with First City Monument Bank, which sum you reasonably ought to have known formed part of the proceeds of unlawful activities to wit: Fraudulent False Accounting and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Sections 18 (c) and 15(2 (b) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.
“COUNT 13: That you, CHIEF OBA OTUDEKO on or about the 3rd day of September 2013 in Lagos, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court whilst being the Chairman of First Bank Plc indirectly had a personal interest in a loan facility sought for by V Tech Dynamics Links Limited in the sum of N6,150,000,000.00 (Six Billion, One Hundred and Fifty Million Naira Only), which interest was not declared to the Bank and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(1) BANKS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ACT 2004 and punishable under Section 18(2) of same Act.”

Continue Reading

Interview

Certificate Scandal: We don’t have your record as a lawyer. – Supreme Court To Ex Speaker Obasa….

Published

on

By

 

More trouble may be brewing for the former Speaker of the Lagos State House of Assembly, Mudashiru Obasa, as the Supreme Court of Nigeria has revealed that there was no record of him as a lawyer in their registry.

 

 

The apex court keeps records of all certified lawyers allowed to handle cases in any Nigerian court.

 

Obasa’s profile on Wikipedia and the Lagos Assembly’s website describes him as a lawyer and solicitor of the Federal Republic of Nigeria even though there is no mention of where he practiced or a case he handled.

 

He is also described on the Assembly’s website as graduating from the Nigerian Law School in 2007, a year after he obtained a Bachelor of Law degree from the Lagos State University.

 

But in a response to an enquiry on the subject matter on July 24, 2020, the Supreme Court categorically stated that Obasa’s name was not found on the numerous rolls of legal practitioners kept with it.

 

 

The letter signed by one Gertrude B. Karenton-Mordi on behalf of the Chief Registrar of the Supreme Court and seen on Monday, said, “This is to inform you that we have checked our records and cannot find the name: MUDASHIRU AJAYI OBASA on the nemerous Rolls of Legal Practitioners kept in this honourable court.

 

 

MUDASHIRU AJAYI OBASA is at liberty to come to the honourable court with his call to bar and qualifying certificates for enrollment.”

 

Interestingly, this is not the first time that the 47-year-old Lagos Assembly Speaker will be linked to a scandal — this merely adds to a long list of alleged wrongdoing Obasa had been discovered to be involved in.

Continue Reading

Interview

National Sports Festival: FG, Enugu govt sign host state agreement

Published

on

By

The Federal and the Enugu State Government have signed the host state agreement in respect of the 2026 National Sports Festival billed to hold in the South East State.

The agreement, which was signed by the Director-General of the National Sports Commission, Hon. Bukola Olopade for the FG and Governor Peter Mbah for Enugu State, on Tuesday, now awards Enugu State the full hosting rights for the 2026 edition of the National Sports Festival.

Speaking at the signing ceremony at the Government House, Enugu, Governor Peter Mbah thanked the Commission and other sports stakeholders for the confidence reposed in the state and his administration to stage the event, assuring that it would discharge its hosting responsibilities in a way that would leave a lifelong memory and experience on the athletes and all lovers of sports in Nigeria and beyond.

“We also appreciate the value and significance of this award. I want to commend the commission for finding Enugu worthy of being the next host of the 23rd National Sports Festival. We are going to discharge ourselves creditably.

“As you know, we like to be a role model as a state that gained preeminence over 115 years ago. We will not want to let our forebears down. We will live up to that standard.

“We have already set forth at dawn. Immediately that announcement was made, we mobilised our team. We are already working on revamping the Awgu Games Village and a whole lot. We have decided to deliver a brand new Games Village. We are also completely renovating the stadium to brand new.

“We are making sure that by the time you come here by the end of this year, you are going to be highly impressed. It is not revamping, rebranding or re-equipping, but we are also going to build additional facilities to the existing one.

“We are looking forward to having a word-class experience befitting the sports men and women, making our hosting a lifelong memory and experience,” he stated.

Earlier in his address, Hon. Olopade said the commission was encouraged by Enugu’s bid, available facilities, improved security in the state, and Governor Mbah’s determination to turn around the sports and social infrastructure to grant Enugu the right to host the event after the 22nd edition to be hosted by Ogun State.

The National Sports Commission boss added that the hosting would boost investment and tourism in the state before, during and after the event.

Continue Reading

Trending