Connect with us

News and Report

Tax reform: Senate suspends debate, panel meets AGF today

Published

on

The Senate has suspended action on the Tax Reforms Bills.

The Senate further instructed its Committee on Finance to stay action on the public hearing pending the time the agitation in the public space was addressed.

It further constituted a special committee to meet with the executive arm and work with the Federal Government to resolve the issues surrounding the Tax Reform Bills.

This was made known by the Deputy Senate President, Jibrin Barau, who presided during plenary on Wednesday.

There has been controversy over the Tax Reform Bills since its introduction to the National Assembly.

The bills are Tax Reform Bills comprising the Joint Revenue Board of Nigeria (Establishment) Bill, 2024; Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill, 2024; Nigeria Revenue Service (Establishment) Bill, 2024 and Nigeria Tax Bill, 2024.

The northern Governors rejected the bills outright, describing them as anti-democracy.

Following this, the National Economic Council, Nigeria’s highest economic advisory body, requested that the tax reforms bill be withdrawn from the NASS for more consultations.

Oyo State Governor, Seyi Makinde, announced the council’s position after its 144th meeting chaired by Vice President Kashim Shettima at the State House, Abuja.

Makinde said council members agreed that the bill be withdrawn as some sections of the country are uncomfortable with some of its sections. He said this would allow for consensus building and understanding.

Following the various controversies that greeted the bills, the Senate on Wednesday invited the president’s Economic team led by the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, alongside the Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Tax, Zacchaeus Adedeji, Director General of the Budget Office, Tanimu Yakubu, into plenary to explain the Tax Reform bills in detail to lawmakers.

After the interaction with the President’s economic team, the Senate passed the bill for a second reading and transmitted it to the Senate Committee on Finance.

After the passage of the bill, the Borno State Governor, Prof Babagana Zulum, accused Oyedele’s team of rushing the enactment of the tax reforms, alleging that the bills are accompanied by misconceptions that require deeper consultations.

“On this tax issue, there are a lot of misconceptions. We felt that the VAT provision in the tax law, based on the calculations we did, would only benefit Lagos and Rivers States. We did our research and concluded that we would lose,” Zulum said.

“Why are we in a rush? We advised the Federal Government to take a pause and expunge some of the clauses that are inimical to Northern Nigeria. What we are saying is, give more time, let us do a deeper consultation to understand the nitty-gritty of this tax regime before passing it into law,” Zulum added during an interview on Channels Television.

Amidst the controversy, Senator Shehu Buba (APC, Bauchi South), in an interview with the British Broadcasting Service Hausa Service said northern Senators agreed to recall the Tax Reforms Bills.

He said, “These bills are complex and require thorough review by tax policy experts.”

He claimed that northern lawmakers strongly oppose the proposed “derivation” formula in the value-added tax distribution system, arguing that northern states would be unfairly impacted.

Also on Tuesday, the President instructed the judiciary to liaise with the legislative arm of government.

Speaking on the controversies, the Deputy Senate President noted that the delegation would meet on Thursday at the National Assembly to resolve all the issues that had caused the uproar.

Barau said, “On the tax reform bills currently before us, we acknowledge that the Senate remains the highest legislative assembly in this country.

“The Senate comprises men and women of wisdom and experience, entrusted to legislate for the peace, stability, and development of the nation.

“The Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, like similar bodies globally, serves as a stabilising force in times of difficulty or disagreement. Through dialogue and consensus, the Senate has consistently provided solutions to national challenges since 1999.”

He added, “In this regard, we have decided to set aside politics, ethnicity, and regionalism to work together on resolving the issues surrounding the tax reform bills.

“In collaboration with the Executive Arm of Government, we agreed to establish a forum to identify and address contentious areas to ensure national unity and progress.

“Before the introduction of these bills, we faced numerous challenges, including insecurity and economic issues.

“The President has been working to address these problems, and we are committed to supporting these efforts while tackling global economic challenges. We also agreed that no other issues should aggravate the country’s current difficulties.”

On Tuesday, following the controversy emanating from the bills, President Tinubu directed the Ministry of Justice to work closely with the National Assembly to address “grey areas” concerning the bill with the legislature.

The Minister of Information and National Orientation, Mohammed Idris, stated this in a statement titled ‘President Tinubu committed to accountability on tax bills, directs Ministry of Justice to work with NASS on concerns.’

Mohammed said, “In line with the established legislative procedure, the Federal Government welcomes meaningful inputs that can address whatever grey areas there may be in the bill.

“In this vein, President Tinubu has already directed the Federal Ministry of Justice and relevant officials who worked on the drafts to work closely with the National Assembly to ensure that all genuine concerns have been addressed before the bills are passed.”

Barau confirmed that the Senate committee would meet with the Attorney-General of the Federation on Thursday (today).

“It has been mutually decided between the Executive and the Senate to engage the Judiciary to sort out these matters.

“The Attorney-General of the Federation will be involved in discussions to identify and resolve areas of disagreement for the nation’s benefit.

“Tomorrow (today), the committee established by the Senate, along with its leadership, will meet with the Attorney-General to address these issues.”

Barau added, “Consequently, the Senate Committee on Finance has been directed to pause further actions on public hearings and other matters related to the tax reform bills until the issues are resolved.”

However, there are indications that the Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), may not be present to attend the meeting on the tax reform bill slated for today.

A senior official at the Ministry of Justice confirmed to our correspondent that the AGF was out of the country and billed to return today.

The source said, “The AGF is not in the country at the moment but he will return tomorrow (today).”

In his response, chairman of the Senate’s special committee, Abba Moro, said they might not meet with the AGF, but added that the lawmakers would definitely hold a meeting amongst themselves.

He said, “Since the AGF is out of the country as you said, and as contemplated by the senate, it might not hold.

“However, the committee will certainly meet to chart the way forward. We will not like to keep Nigeria and Nigerians waiting for too long for answers to their questions.”

It was, however, learnt that the AGF’s team might meet with the senators to begin talks on how to resolve the tax bills concern.

The committee is constituted by the leadership of the Senate, as well as other members –Adamu Ailero (PDP, Kebbi Central), Orji Kalu (APC, Abia North), Seriake Dickson (PDP, Bayelsa  West) Titus Zam (Benue South), Abdullahi Yahaya (Kebbi), Adeola Olamilekan (APC, Ogun West), Sani Musa (APC, Niger East) and Adetokunbo Abiru (APC, Lagos East).

Meanwhile, the Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, Taiwo Oyedele, said the need to pass the Tax Reforms Bills was “urgent” because of the struggles of most Nigerians.

Oyedele made this statement during an Arise News interview monitored by our correspondent on Wednesday, in response to comments made by Borno State Governor, Prof Babagana Zulum, on the proposed bills.

He also stated that the proposed 60 per cent derivation was the only way to promote more equity in the sharing of VAT while promoting economic activities across Nigeria.

Responding to Governor Zulum’s comments that the bills were rushed, Oyedele stated that everyone, including the governor, “needs to acknowledge that we are at a stage where the majority of our people are struggling and are in multi-dimensional poverty.”

“Our small businesses are dealing with over 60 official levies, taxes and over 200 unofficial ones. We are struggling to have people just feed because inflation is escalating.

“We have people who don’t have decent jobs. That’s why the poverty rate is high, even though officially they say the unemployment rate is low. We are dealing with all these issues.

“If you want to provide relief for your people, you should do it quickly because it’s urgent. It’s an emergency. The way we should respond to these issues should be similar to how the world responded to COVID-19.”

“There were countries where laws were passed within two days because it was an emergency. We are not even doing it in two days. We have been working on this for over a year,” he said.

Oyedele explained that his team had a session with the governors around May, sharing drafts with them.

“We had engagement with the governors themselves but you would imagine that if you manage to get airtime with them, they are unlikely to give you one hour or two. There was a particular meeting we had for 15 minutes.

“And I said jokingly to the governors that I don’t expect your excellency to read all these details because we have also shared them with your technical people.

“But we have done all of that. The bills are now in the National Assembly. As we speak, the bills have been there for over a month already. So, I don’t think that’s rushing it,” he said.

He added that there is no rush, as the bills are currently before the National Assembly and have remained under scrutiny for one month.

However, he emphasised that stakeholders should work to finalise the bills quickly so that relief could be provided for Nigerians.

“We are always happy to engage more, but we think that what is happening now is healthy and good for our development because there is more attention now to this issue, which means an opportunity to further engage.

“Because of the inequity that we are going to correct, we hadn’t envisaged that this was going to be a pushback from other states. We thought the pushback would come from Lagos State and Rivers State because that was what the data we had was saying to us. It’s almost like we ended up with, the people we are fighting for are now fighting us. Probably if we knew where the pushback is from, we would have engaged more,” he added.

 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

Staff hack Sterling Bank system, steal depositors’ N1.2bn funds

Published

on

By

Sterling Bank Limited and its holding company, Sterling Financial Holdings Company, are currently battling a N1.257, 536, 572. 80 billion depositors’ funds which were stolen from the bank by some of its staff.

We gathered that the staff colluded with some fraudsters to hack the bank’s banking platform and stole the said fund.

The suspects, namely Victor Nwabueze (50), Favour Odey (22), Adekunle Daniel (34), Akachukwu Alagbogu, and Yetunde Oguntade (28)—were arraigned by the Police Special Fraud Unit (PSFU), Ikoyi, Lagos, before Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Thursday.

The group faced a three-count charge of conspiracy, hacking, and money laundering under the Cybercrimes Act and Money Laundering Prohibition Act.

The prosecutor, Barrister Justine Enang, alleges that the suspects, in collaboration with internal staff of Sterling Bank, breached sensitive systems between November 3 and 4, 2024, using compromised data, including IP addresses and mobile equipment identities – 14984244, IP address 84252.113.3 & 88 transaction., to transfer funds to fraudulent accounts.

He informed the court that the alleged acts of the defendants contravened sections 27(1)(b); 14(1) of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention Etc.) Act, 2015 as amended in 2024, Read along with section 14(1) of the same Act.

Enang also told the court that the defendants’ act was contrary to and punishable under Section 18(2)(b) & (d) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

The Charges Against The Defendants Read: “That you Victor Nwabueze Ogochukwy “m”, Favour Odey “f’, Adekunle Daniel “m”, Akachukwu Alagbogu and others now at large, sometimes on the 3rd & 4th November 2024, in Lagos State, within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Division of The Federal High Court, with intent to defraud, did conspire amongst yourselves to commit a felony to wit: internet fraud to the sum of N1, 257, 536, 572.50 (One Billion, Two Hundred and Fifty Seven Million, Five Hundred and Thirty Six Thousand, Five Hundred and Seventy Two Naira, Fifty Kobo) by false pretence and thereby committed an offence contrary to section 27(1)(b) of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention Etc.) Act, 2015 as amended in 2024, Read along with section 14(1) of the same Act.

“That you Victor Nwabueze Ogochukwu “m”, Favour Odey “f’, Adekunle Daniel “m”, Akachukwu Alagbogu and others now at large, sometimes on the 3rd & 4th November 2024, in Lagos State, within the aforementioned Judicial Division of The Federal High Court, did knowingly and without authority cause financial lost to Sterling Bank Plc to the tune of N1, 257, 536, 572. 80 (One Billion, Two Hundred and Fifty Seven Million, Five Hundred and Thirty Six Thousand, Five Hundred and Seventy Two Naira, Fifty Kobo) by suppressing one of the banking platform and Bance Application from their various customers’ account to different fraudulent accounts with the collusion of an internal staff/external parties for possible compromise on sensitive data and security system of the bank by using international mobile equipment identity 14984244, IP address 84252.113.3 & 88 transaction, thereby conferred economic benefits on yourselves by converting the money in question to your own use against the Sterling Bank Plc and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 14(1) of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention Etc.) Act, 2015 as Amended in 2024.

“That you Victor Nwabueze Ogochukwu ‘m’, Favour Odey ‘f, Adekunle Daniel ‘m’, Akachukwu Alagbogu and others now at large, sometimes on the 3rd & 4th November 2024, in Lagos State, in the aforementioned Judicial Division of Federal High Court, Lagos, did directly or indirectly converts or transfers, retains or takes possession or control of funds belonging to Sterling Bank Plc, knowingly or reasonably ought to have known that such funds is, or forms part of the proceeds of an unlawful Act and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(2)(b) & (d) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.”

While they pleaded not guilty, the prosecution opposed bail, citing the defendants’ potential flight risk.

Justice Lewis-Allagoa eventually granted bail at N50 million each, with one surety who must own landed property within the court’s jurisdiction.

Pending bail fulfillment, the accused were remanded in custody.

The case is adjourned to March 13, 2025, for trial.

Authorities continue to investigate other suspects believed to be at large.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Arik Air shareholders tackle AMCON over N455bn debt claim

Published

on

By

The shareholders of Arik Air, an indigenous airline currently under the control of the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria, have debunked claims that the debt accruable to the airline’s owner, Johnson Arumem-Ikhide, has risen to N455bn.

The shareholders, through a statement signed by their representative, Godwin Aideloje, described as fallacy the debt record of AMCON against Arik founder.

Earlier, AMCON, through its Head of Corporate Communication, Jude Nwauzor, said the total debt of Arumem-Ikhide was N455.17bn as of December 31, 2024, in all his three investments.

AMCON also said that its intervention in the troubled airline in February 2017 saved the carrier from liquidation, insisting that it would ensure the recovery of the total debts owed to the corporation by various business organisations in Arik Air.

Giving the breakdown of the total debt, Nwauzor alleged that Arik as of December 2024 owed AMCON N227.6bn; Rockson Engineering, N163.5bn, while Ojemai Farms owed the corporation another N14bn, totaling N455bn.

Reacting to this, Arik shareholders refused to comment on the matter saying it was currently before the court.

“This is a matter before the court. Unlike AMCON who have no respect for the courts, we will not resort to subjudical remarks. We will not join the desperate attempt by AMCON to overreach the courts and desecrate our justice system.

“The fictitious claim of N455bn as alleged Arik Air indebtedness to AMCON by Mr Jude Nwauzor is a fallacy. It seems clear that AMCON is invested in dubious storytelling and falsehoods.

This allegation is defeated by AMCON’s claim in its Suit No. FHC/L/CS/175/17 with which it took Arik Air into receivership and gained full control and management of operations, assets, and liabilities of the airline,” they stated in the statement.

The shareholders recalled a Federal High Court judgement of March 31, 2023, ordering AMCON and its Receiver Manager to file a statement of affairs and audited financial reports with the Corporate Affairs Commission to balance and compare the books, Aideloje said AMCON refused to appear before a Financial Reporting Council to defend it positions.

The shareholders said rather than appear before the reporting council, AMCON uploaded the audited account of the business(es) on the Arik Air website, a document the shareholders have also dismissed.

During the press briefing, the Head of Corporate Communication at AMCON said considering the state of Arik Air’s insolvency at the takeover time, the airline would have been sold in its entity if not for the intervention of the Federal Government which directed that the airline should be managed.

But in the shareholders’ reaction, Aideloje stressed that “It is instructive to note the new version of the reason why AMCON took over Arik is a government mandate. What a preposterous statement from a Federal Government employee! This is a gross misrepresentation of the Federal Government as being in the business of arbitrary takeover of private businesses with a stroke of pen. This is indeed a disservice to the government and people of Nigeria by AMCON.

“We wish to state again that before the forceful takeover, Arik Air was recognized for its operational excellence and significant contributions to Nigeria’s aviation sector. Contrary to AMCON’s claims, the airline was meeting its financial obligations, as evidenced by remarks and recognition by global institutions; recently Afreximbank acknowledged legacy Arik as a model in Africa at a just-concluded International Aircraft Leasing and Finance Conference in Ireland Dublin a few days ago.”

 

Continue Reading

News and Report

Bisi Onasanya Refutes Allegations, Vows to Defend Reputation

Published

on

By

 

A former Group Managing Director of First Bank, Dr. Bisi Onasanya has dismissed allegations circulating on social media, suggesting his involvement in a purported commercial loan facility transaction controversy carried out 12 years ago at First Bank.

 

In a statement released to the press over the weekend, Onasanya, who spoke through his Communication Advisor, Mr. Michael Osunnuyi, described the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish the stellar reputation of the renowned retired banker and Chartered accountant.

 

 

 

“Our attention has been drawn to allegations and charge sheet circulating on social media suggesting Dr. Bisi Onasanya’s involvement in a purported commercial loan controversy at First Bank 12 years ago,” Osunnuyi said.

 

 

 

“While we have consistently chosen to ignore such baseless attacks for over ten years, the growing concern expressed by family, friends, and associates from across the globe compels us to address these unfounded claims.”

 

 

 

The Communication Advisor said that Dr. Onasanya served First Bank with dedication and integrity throughout his illustrious career.

 

 

 

“His stellar reputation of integrity, built over four decades of impeccable professional service, cannot and will not be tarnished by these false allegations and incorrect charges,” the statement noted.

 

 

 

According to the statement, the matter in question was investigated eight years ago by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC two years after Dr. Onasanya had voluntarily and meritoriously retired from the bank as the group managing director upon the completion of two terms in office. Since then, Dr. Onasanya has not been contacted on this matter and has remained willing to support and cooperate with the law enforcement if required.

 

 

 

“What is baffling,” the statement continued, “is that a commercial transaction which occurred in 2013 and was thoroughly investigated eight years ago, where Dr. Onasanya established his innocence and non-involvement in the commercial transaction controversy, has now resurfaced in 2025 in the form of criminal prosecution. This is beyond his imagination.”

 

 

 

It also noted that, to date, Dr. Onasanya has not been served with any charges, summoned, or formerly invited by any court or investigating agency regarding these claims since the matter was investigated and dispensed eight years ago.

 

 

 

However, he stated categorically that Dr. Onasanya is readily available anytime in Nigeria to have his day in court whenever he is summoned to defend his reputation and clear his name.

 

 

 

Osunnuyi further pointed out that the allegations appear to follow a deliberate pattern every year with identical language and content being disseminated across multiple media platforms. He urged the media to exercise caution and verify information before publication, stressing the serious implications of libel.

 

 

 

“We have noticed a pattern of identical language and content being circulated across various media platforms, suggesting a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception. It looks more like a hatchet job by some unscrupulous people to continue to malign and tarnish the image of Dr. Onasanya. We strongly appeal to the media to verify the information they disseminate and act responsibly,” Osunnuyi added.

 

 

 

“Since voluntarily leaving First Bank and the banking industry in 2015, he has endured and ignored incessant and unwarranted attacks on his person,” Osunnuyi said.

 

 

 

“These persistent efforts to malign his character are deeply regrettable and baseless.”

 

 

 

The statement also clarified that Dr. Onasanya has never expressed interest in which person or group of persons in charge of the control or ownership of First Bank or any other financial institution, for that matter. Instead, he has moved on from banking and remained committed to making a positive impact in people’s lives and other sectors of the economy.

 

 

 

Dr. Onasanya expressed gratitude for the support of his family, friends, and associates, whose belief in his integrity has been a source of strength. He assured them that he remains focused on upholding the values and principles that have defined his career and life over the years and he would leave no stone unturned to defend his reputation and expose the truth regardless of whose ox is gored.

 

 

 

“We are confident that the truth will ultimately prevail and that justice will be served. Dr. Onasanya remains committed to upholding his unblemished record and will continue to cooperate fully within the ambit of the law to clear his name,” the statement concluded.

Continue Reading

Trending