Connect with us

News and Report

Telecom services risk disruption as 800 workers begin strike

Published

on

 

Nigeria’s telecom sector risks shutdown as about 800 workers from the Private Telecommunications and Communications Senior Staff Association have embarked on strike, threatening to cripple services nationwide.

 

The union, largely contract staff, warned of massive disruptions to telecom operations if its demands were not met, as this would leave millions of subscribers to face a potential communication blackout.

 

The strike began on Monday and the union’s demands include, among other things, reinstatement of some of its sacked workers, recognition of the union, improved working conditions, and remittance of membership dues.

 

 

The strike has become inevitable because of the prevalent precarious working conditions our members are enduring in the sector, the refusal of the employers to recognise and respect the constitutional right of these workers to freely associate with the union, and the unjust sack of three members of the union,” it stated in its seven-day strike notice.

 

 

the union’s Secretary-General, Okonu Abdullahi, said the association’s 800 workers play a significant role in managing critical infrastructure like base stations for infrastructure companies such as IHS, Huawei, etc.

 

“The implications of the strike will be massive because we have told all our members not to respond to any service outage from our employers. The fact remains that there are outages every day, and if our engineers do not respond to those outages, subscribers in those areas will be affected,” he said.

 

He said members of the union include field maintenance engineers, transmission engineers, customer service engineers, fibre engineers, and other critical staff working for telecom service companies.

 

 

The culpable companies include among others, Huawei Technologies Nigeria Limited, Tylium Nigeria Limited, Specific Tools & Techniques, CPNL (Chinese Pacific Networks Limited) and CITCC (China International Telecommunications Construction Corporation), JUSPARTNER.

 

The PUNCH understands that telcos like MTN, Globacom, Airtel, 9mobile own base stations and fibre infrastructure but often outsource management to servicing companies.

 

These companies, in turn, sometimes subcontract the work to smaller contractors, who employ the striking workers. This complex web of outsourcing has led to concerns about worker welfare and job security.

 

 

The telecom union had in April embarked on a similar strike over a similar situation, which was resolved through a reconciliatory meeting convened by the Ministry of Labour between the union and the telecom servicing companies.

 

According to the PTECSSAN secretary, “The labour ministry had intervened in our previous industrial action, but unfortunately, the companies are still repeating the same issues, which have now escalated because we have more members participating in this strike.”

 

 

When asked if the Federal Government or the companies have engaged with the union on the current industrial action, he said, “We have given them ample opportunity to address our demands, but they have chosen to ignore us. If they continue to neglect our grievances, we will have no choice but to take more drastic measures.”

 

 

The officer in charge of the telecoms sector at the Ministry of Labour, Princess Powei, acknowledged the workers’ concerns and assured that the government is committed to resolving the issues promptly.

 

 

Powei who was part of the team that resolved the previous strike by the workers in April, stated, “One thing I can assure you is that the strike will not linger. I will start making calls now to see what we can do to ensure that the grievances are addressed.”

 

In a phone conversation with our correspondent, a top Huawei official from China, identified only as Bruce, denied that any of his team members were participating in the ongoing strike by the PTECSSAN.

 

 

Bruce stated that all employees were working in the office and had not received any notification about the strike.

 

“As far as I know, everyone is working, and I don’t think anyone is involved in this,” Bruce said. “However, I will verify the situation with my team.”

 

When questioned about field workers, the Huawei representative acknowledged that they might be impacted by the strike, but clarified that they were not directly employed by Huawei. Instead, they were part of subcontracting teams.

 

 

In April, when the union embarked on a similar strike, The PUNCH reached out to Gbenga Adebayo, Chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecom Operators of Nigeria, for comments. He stated that the union was unknown to mobile operators, saying:

 

“This group is not known to us in ALTON, and the companies mentioned are not members of ALTON. ALTON subscribes to freedom of association, and we are open to dialogue for the greater good,” he said in a chat.

 

 

The union was asked if it had any recognition or affiliation with the telcos; Abdullahi responded, “We’ve tried to contact ALTON, but they’ve never made themselves available to discuss issues with us.

 

“We wrote to them in 2020 and 2021, sent reminders, and even followed up with calls, but they always had excuses, such as their chairman being out of the country. We’re wondering why they’re ignoring us, especially since they’re aware of our existence,” he said.

 

The President of the Association of Telecommunications Companies of Nigeria, Tony Emoekpere, told The PUNCH that he was not aware of the matter regarding the potential strike by telecom workers, as the union is not affiliated with the association.

 

 

However, Emoekpere emphasized the critical importance of protecting the telecom sector, saying, “Telecom services have become a critical infrastructure that must be safeguarded at all costs.”

 

He further stressed that the telecom industry is a vital asset to the country, adding, “Anything that jeopardizes its functionality must be protected. We cann

ot afford to compromise the stability of this essential sector.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

News and Report

EFCC Arraigns Five Nigerians For Allegedly Tampering With, Forcibly Accessing Forfeited Property In Lagos

Published

on

By

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has arraigned five individuals for allegedly tampering with a forfeited property.

Lagos Zonal Directorate arraigned the suspects before Justice A.O. Owoeye of the Federal High Court in Ikoyi, Lagos, on Tuesday.

The defendants, Benjamin Okoye, Moughalu David Arinze, Okey Okeke, Ekene Mgbeokwere, and Eboh Thaddeus, were charged alongside Ilongwo Angela, who is currently at large.

The charge pertains to their alleged unauthorized occupation and tampering with a property located at Plot 165C, Block 12, Amuwo Odofin, Ajayi Street, Diamond Estate, Lagos, which is under an interim forfeiture order to the Federal Government.

The count reads: “That you, Ilongwo Angela (now at large), Benjamin Okoye, Moughalu David Arinze, Okey Okeke, Ekene Mgbeokwere, Eboh Thaddeus, sometime in July 2024 in Lagos State, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, without due authorization dealt, with the property of Obinna Ezenwaka situate and located at Plot 165C, Block 12, Amuwo Odofin, Ajayi Street, Diamond Estate, Amuwo Odofin, Lagos, subject of interim forfeiture to the Federal Government of Nigeria, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 32(1) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment) Act, 2004.”

According to Dele Oyewale, EFCC Head of Media & Publicity, their actions contravened Section 32(1) of the EFCC Establishment Act, 2004. The defendants pleaded not guilty to the charge.

Prosecution counsel Hannatu U. KofarNaisa informed the court that the EFCC was ready to proceed with the trial and presented a witness to testify.

However, the defense counsel, M.C. Odo, representing the first to fourth defendants, requested bail for his clients, citing their prolonged detention. Counsel for the fifth defendant, N. Chukwuemeka, also referenced a prior bail granted to his client.

In response, KofarNaisa stated that she had not received the defense counsel’s bail applications. The court confirmed this and adjourned the case to January 24, 2025, to rule on the bail requests.

The prosecution called Abubakar Mohammed, an EFCC operative and custodian of forfeited assets, as its witness. Mohammed testified that on July 22, 2024, during an inspection of the property, he met the defendants and informed them of its interim forfeiture status.

“Despite being asked to vacate the property, the defendants later broke the padlock and returned,” Mohammed said.

He confirmed their arrest for tampering with the forfeited asset.

The court admitted the interim forfeiture order dated October 6, 2017, as evidence and marked it as Exhibit A. Mohammed further disclosed that the property was subject to a final forfeiture order from the Lagos State High Court.

Justice Owoeye adjourned the trial to February 14, 2025, for the continuation of proceedings, allowing the prosecution to submit additional documents.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Suspect arraigned for allegedly stealing bank’s N1.1bn

Published

on

By

A 43-year-old man Sunday Ozimede, who allegedly hacked Moniepoint Microfinance Bank Vault and stole the sum of N1,190, 728, 076 bn, from the bank, was on Monday arraigned by the police before the Federal High Court in Lagos State.

The defendant is facing three counts bordering on conspiracy, hacking and obtaining by false pretence preferred against him by the Police Special Fraud Unit.

The PSFU’s Prosecution Counsel, Justine Enang, told the court that the defendant allegedly hacked the microfinance bank and obtained the sum of N945, 728,076m, by false pretence.

Enang told the court that the defendant caused financial loss to Moniepoint Microfinance Bank to the tune of N145m, by planting a bug in the bank’s data system.

He said Ozimede and others now at large conspired, amongst themselves, to commit the alleged offences sometime in May 2024.

The prosecutor told the court that Ozimede fraudulently diverted the above-mentioned money from various Moniepont Microfinance Bank’s customers’ deposited funds through numerous transactions to other banks.

According to the prosecutor, the offences committed contravened Sections 27 (i)(b),14 of the Cyber Crimes (Prohibition, Prevention etc) Act, 2015 as Amended in 2024, and Section 14 (1) of the same Act, and 18(2) (b) & (d) and punishable under Section 18(3) of the Money Laundering (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

However, the defendant pleaded not guilty to the charges against him.

Following his not-guilty plea, the prosecutor urged the court to remand him to a correctional centre pending the conclusion of the trial and asked the court for a trial date.

The defendant’s lawyer, Abdulmalik Ibrahim, in a motion for bail, pleaded with the court to admit his client to bail in the most liberal terms.

But the prosecutor opposed the bail application and accused the defendant of being a ‘flight risk’, saying that he might not turn up for his trial if granted bail.

Justice Ambrose Lewis-Allagoa, after listening to the parties’ submissions, admitted the defendant to bail in the sum of N50m, with one surety in like sum.

The judge also ordered that the surety must be a landed property owner within the jurisdiction of the court.

He added that the bail terms must be verified by the court’s registrar and the prosecutor.

The case was adjourned to March 13, 2025, for trial.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Why we slammed ban on two Nigerian companies – World Bank

Published

on

By

The World Bank Group has explained why it announced a 30-month debarment of two Nigerian companies, including Viva Atlantic Limited and Technology House Limited.

The Washington-based bank disclosed this in a statement issued on Monday.

The ban also affected their Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Norman Didam.

The World Bank said the companies and their CEO were banned for fraudulent, collusive, and corrupt practices linked to the National Social Safety Nets Project in Nigeria.

Accordingly, the bank explained that the project aimed to provide targeted financial assistance to poor and vulnerable households, which was compromised due to several unethical practices during a 2018 procurement and subsequent contract process.

“The World Bank Group today announced the 30-month debarment of two Nigeria-based companies—Viva Atlantic Limited and Technology House Limited—and their Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Norman Bwuruk Didam.

“The debarment is in connection with fraudulent, collusive, and corrupt practices as part of the National Social Safety Nets Project in Nigeria.”

We earlier reported that the companies were indicted for fraudulent handling of the World Bank’s project in Nigeria.

Last year, the Nigerian government secured a $1.5 million loan from the World Bank for key economic reforms, which include fuel subsidies and the introduction of comprehensive tax policies.

Continue Reading

Trending