Connect with us

Society

Unraveling the enigmatic Dan Etete at 80 – Toni Kan

Published

on

 

There is a popular Bible story that has fascinated me for years. It is the story of Blind Bartimeus.

 

His encounter with Jesus Christ is recounted in the book of Matthew in Chapter 20 from verses 29 – 30 and subsequently in Luke 18:35-43. It is a simple story that intrigues and fascinates.

 

Jesus and his disciples were leaving Jericho and as usual they were followed by a large crowd. As Jesus and his disciples proceeded they came across a blind beggar called Bartimeus. When he learnt that it was Jesus passing by, Bartimeus screamed at the top of his lungs , “Jesus, Son of David, have pity on me!”

 

The people attempted to hush him but Bartimeus screamed louder and louder until Jesus called him over and asked him what he wanted. When he said “Master I want to see,” Jesus healed him and restored his sight and Bartimeus went along with Jesus and his disciples in joy.

End of story but is it?

I remember as a 12 year old boy asking my father why the Bible recorded the man’s name as Blind Bartimeus even though he was healed at the end.

“Why is he not called “Healed Bartimeus” or “Formerly Blind Bartimeus”?”

My father had looked at me and laughed before telling me that “People like to dwell on negative things!”

The story of blind Bartimeus came to mind when I read about Senator Dan Etete’s 80th birthday on Friday January 10, 2025.

My first thought was; oh is he still alive? And then as I read tribute after tribute, I realised that for someone who has worked in and written about Nigeria’s oil and gas industry for over 15 years, I knew very little about him.

Search on Google for Dan Etete and you are regaled with stories about an oil deal gone wrong. The impression you get is that Dan Etete‘s life began and ended with Malabu and OPL 245. It was an intriguing thought. How does one condense 80 years into one incident?

In my writings, from novels to biographies, I am keenly interested in dissecting human action and motivation; why do people do the things they do whether in a fictive universe or in business? And the first thing you learn as you go down that path is that you will have to peel off layers upon layers to find the real person because human beings are at their core chameleons.

The tributes saluted Dan Etete, the politician, technocrat and statesman who is “celebrated among the Ijaw nation as the Petroleum Minister who “championed the empowerment of indigenous players in the oil and gas sector, paving the way for greater involvement of Ijaw entrepreneurs in managing our natural resources.”

In the tributes, he is further described as a “visionary leader and one of the pioneers of Nigeria’s oil and gas industry.” They go on to note that Etete is “an untiring champion of economic empowerment for the Niger Delta people and whose tenure as oil minister laid the ground work for indigenous participation in the oil and gas sector.”

For someone who writes biographies for a living, the biggest pitfall to avoid is hagiography. Every autobiography or memoir and even an authorized biography has an agenda and the discerning writer must seek a delicate balance in order not to fall prey to the hagiographic bogeyman.

That leads us to the question; who exactly is Dan Etete? How did he emerge to become a figure of national significance? Who is this figure that seems like a conundrum ensconced in an enigma? This man about who reams of newsprint has been expended and who does not even bother to grant interviews to dispel or disprove? What sort of biographical work could emerge from a man like Dan Etete?

The man we know today as Senator Dan Etete, The Ndagbudu Keme Keni of Izon-Ibe was born Etete Dauzia on January 10, 1945. He started school in Ajegunle as a student at Christ the King School between 1955 and 1960. From Ajegunle he proceeded to Bishop Demiare Grammar School, Yenagoa from 1960 to 1964.

His career kicked off with the Nigeria Customs Service from where, after years of meritorious service, he made the leap into business. But it was not a blind leap. To prepare himself for entrepreneurship, Dan Etete took many administrative courses from renowned institutions to equip him for leadership and those would come in handy when he dipped his toe into the murky waters of politics.

He would be elected Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria in the 2nd republic and, recognition of his administrative and business acumen would lead to his emergence as Chairman, Senate Committee on Petroleum and Energy. He was a member of the National Constitutional conference between 1994 and 1995 before his eventual appointment as Minister of Petroleum Resources. He was in office from 1995–1998.

In their 80th birthday tribute to their son and brother, the Etete Royal Family of Odi described the former minister as “a “shining example of what it means to serve, be loyal and industrious with an unwavering commitment to unity and progress especially for the Ijaw nation.” They also go ahead to remark on what they described as his “detribalized approach to leadership” which they wrote broke “barriers, inspired hope and forged harmony within the family and across cultures.”

To return again to hagiography, is there proof of this? In a long piece published in 2019, on one of the rare occasions in which Dan Etete is quoted in the press, The Africa Report writes on Etete’s celebration of the life of former French leader Jacques Chirac whom Etete interacted with as Nigeria’s emissary during peace negotiations around the Bakassi peninsula.

Etete’s comments to The Africa Report highlight him as a statesman of note whose influence extended beyond Nigeria and whose diplomatic verve was instrumental in avoiding war with Cameroon.

The report in quoting Etete writes that thanks to Chirac’s diplomatic overtures “we avoided the worst in the late 1990s, when Nigeria and Cameroon were fighting over the sovereignty of the Bakassi Peninsula (peacefully surrendered by the former to the latter in 2008), an area rich in oil and fish. President Chirac, to whom General Abacha, then President of Nigeria, had sent me, used his influence to intervene between the two countries,” he recalls. “He made me contact the Tunisian Ben Ali, the Beninese Mathieu Kérékou, the Togolese Gnassingbé Eyadéma, and the Gabonese Omar Bongo. Informal contacts were also made at the France-Africa summit in Ouagadougou in 1996.”

It is, however, curious that whenever the Bakassi issue comes up, Etete’s name or contribution is never mentioned.

This error of omission was also apparent during his 80th birthday with the loud silence from the oil and gas sector in Nigeria which is the direct beneficiary of his time in office with his vision for indigenous participation in the oil and gas ecosystem.

The Africa Report underlines the fact with “when he was minister, he wanted to entrust marginal blocs to “indigenous” people, and develop a new class of young Nigerians “who have succeeded thanks to him”.

One significant success story, the magazine notes, is Famfa owned by one of Africa’s richest women, Folorunsho Alakija. Now, while we credit Diezani Alison-Madueke with bringing the the Local Content Act into being under Goodluck Jonathan, would we be remiss to say that without Dan Etete’s pioneering vision there would be no Local Content Act?

The marginal field regime was first mooted during Etete’s tenure under The Petroleum Act of Nigeria 1996. Paragraph 16A of the act defined Oil Marginal Fields as “such fields as the president may from time to time identify as marginal”. Eze, C. L et al writing in “Overview On The Emergence Of Marginal Oil Fields In Nigeria and Their Contribution To The Country’s Oil Production” throw some light on what constitutes a marginal field, “some oil fields are considered marginal fields based on the smallness of the reserve; they are considered too small for production to be economically viable by large multinational oil companies” before going ahead to highlight the success of the programme albeit with challenges. “By 2014, nine marginal field operators were contributing about 2.46% of Nigeria total oil production….” That growth has been exponential following subsequent bid rounds that have produced the success stories like Seplat Energy and others.

The dog-eared aphorism that a prophet is without honour in his homeland is upended in the case of Dan Etete evident, as already referenced, in the effusive tributes from his Ijaw community. A tribute signed by Hon Tariye Isaac Lelei, Executive Chairman Kolokuma/Opokuma Local Government Area, described Etete as a “passionate advocate for the rights and development of the Niger Delta.”

Another signed by Prof. Benjamin Ogele Okaba of the Ijaw National Congress saluted Dan Etete as a “foremost icon of the Ijaw struggle for self-determination” whose contributions “championed initiatives that fostered local content, paved the way for offshore exploration and advocated for the proper utilization for Nigeria’s vast natural resources.”

For the Ijaw Creek Elites, Dan Etete is a “towering icon of resilience, patriotism and industry” whose “life exemplifies the spirit of determination and excellence that defines the Ijaw people.”

If these testimonials reflect reality, the question that insists on an answer becomes, why has Dan Etete’s life and achievements been circumscribed by one incident? The answer lies in the fact that we have been presented, consistently, with a single story and a biographical exegesis may well be the means of providing a compelling and comprehensive composite of the man, the politician, technocrat and statesman.

 

***Toni Kan is a PR expert, financial analyst and biographer.

Society

Oando Boss, Wale Tinubu Receives Award as Best Investor of the Year

Published

on

By

 

Jubril Adewale Tinubu, oil tycoon and GCE of leading oil and gas firm, OANDO, yesterday shone brilliantly like a well-cut diamond when he received the award for the New Telegraph Investor/Transaction of the Year 2024.

 

The oil guru with three decades of expectational performance in the oil sector was among other prominent Nigerians that went home with honours at the Oriental Hotels, venue of the ceremony.

 

The award, described as well- deserved, was presented to Tinubu for leading his team to successfully completing the acquisition of Agip Oil Company at $783 million.

 

The transaction, which was completed in August 2024, was described my many as a remarkable one the nation’s economy.

 

Tinubu is an intelligent, pragmatic and a genius who strikes when the iron is hottest.

 

Gifted with a knack to spot opportunity ahead of the crowd, Tinubu has in the last 30 years of unbroken entrepreneurial voyage positioned Oando among the best oil and gas company in the world.

He believes Nigeria offers limitless possibilities and opportunities, and holds high, at all times, the banner of hope.

 

Today, the business has not only earned him fame and wealth, but has also contributed in great measures to the economic development of Africa and beyond.

 

Other awardees on the night include Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State won the Governor of the Year 2024; Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu of Lagos State received the Governor of the Year in Projects, while Governor Ahmed Aliyu of Sokoto State won Governor of the Year in Economy

 

 

Others are Governor Sheriff Oborevwori of Delta State; Osun State Governor, Senator Ademola Adeleke; Ekiti State Governor, Biodun Oyebanji; Group Chief Executive Officer of the Nigeria National Petroleum Corporation Limited (NNPCL), Mr Mele Kyari, won the newspaper’s prestigious Man of the Year 2024, while the Minister of Aviation and Aerospace Development, Barrister Festus Keyamo (SAN), won Minister of the Year 2024 in Transformative Leadership.

Continue Reading

Society

The weaponization of justice and the injustice faced by Dan Etete – Jeremiah Perekeme 0woupele

Published

on

By

 

In the intricate corridors of global jurisprudence, the scales of justice often tip under the weight of political machinations and economic interests. The case of Dan Etete, Nigeria’s former Minister of Petroleum, epitomizes how legal systems can be manipulated, leading to profound personal and national injustices.

Dan Etete, appointed as Nigeria’s Minister of Petroleum Resources in 1995, played a pivotal role in introducing the marginal oil field regime and indigenous participation in Nigeria’s oil and gas industry. His contributions have however been beclouded by the controversy around the controversial OPL 245. This oil block, one of Africa’s richest, became the focus of a protracted legal battle involving major oil companies amid allegations of corruption. Etete’s involvement led to accusations that have marred his reputation and overshadowed his contributions to Nigeria’s oil sector.

In a landmark decision, an Italian court acquitted Eni, Shell, and associated individuals, including Etete, of corruption charges related to OPL 245. The court concluded that there was no case to answer, highlighting the absence of sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegations. This verdict underscores the complexities inherent in international legal proceedings, where accusations often outpace the evidence required for conviction.

Etete’s ordeal is not isolated. Globally, individuals have faced similar legal battles, where accusations are levied, with years spent in court, only to culminate in acquittals. These cases highlight systemic issues within legal frameworks that allow for the weaponization of justice, often driven by political or economic motivations.

The protracted legal saga of Amanda Knox serves as a poignant illustration of Italy’s judicial labyrinth. Knox, an American student, was accused of the 2007 murder of Meredith Kercher in Perugia. After initial convictions and subsequent acquittals, she was finally exonerated by Italy’s Supreme Court in 2015.

The case highlighted significant issues within the Italian legal system. Issues were raised around the handling of forensic evidence, media interference, and prosecutorial conduct. It also underscored the challenges of ensuring justice in a system where legal procedures can be as complex as the crimes themselves.

In the UK, the case of the Birmingham Six remains a stark reminder of the fallibility of justice systems. Six Irish men were wrongfully convicted in 1975 for pub bombings in Birmingham, based on coerced confessions and questionable forensic evidence. After 16 years of imprisonment, their convictions were quashed in 1991, revealing systemic flaws such as investigative misconduct and the suppression of evidence. This case prompted significant reforms in the UK’s criminal justice system, emphasizing the need for checks and balances to prevent miscarriages of justice.

The term “weaponization of justice” refers to the deliberate manipulation of legal systems to achieve objectives beyond the pursuit of truth and fairness. The weaponization of legal technicalities, whether through coerced confessions, mishandled evidence, or political interference, undermines the foundational principles of justice.

In Dan Etete’s case, the prolonged legal battles, despite eventual acquittal, suggest a misuse of judicial processes, leading to reputational damage. Despite his achievements that merit recognition, and most notably his discharge and acquittal in three jurisdictions – ITALY, UNITED KINGDOM, and Nigeria; he has remained the focal point of smear campaigns.

What does his discharge and acquittal really mean? It means that Dan Etete has been formally cleared of charges in a court of law. This means the court has found him not guilty of the charges brought against him. An acquittal signifies that there was insufficient evidence to prove the person committed the alleged offence, or was proven innocent. This means the accused is released from the legal process and is free to go. If he has been found to have done nothing wrong by the Nigerian Legal system, where the judiciary has come under scrutiny in recent times, is it being insinuated that the course of justice was perverted in those other jurisdictions?

In reflecting upon the Chief Dan Etete cases, it becomes evident that the pursuit of justice requires constant vigilance, systemic introspection, and unwavering commitment to fairness. Just as poverty can be weaponized to perpetuate societal inequities, legal ambiguities when exploited, lead to miscarriages of justice.

Moreover, they erode public trust in legal institutions, deter individuals from public service, and can have economic repercussions, especially in sectors as vital as oil and gas. Furthermore, they highlight the need for reforms to prevent the misuse of legal systems and to ensure that justice is truly blind.

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) often find themselves under intense scrutiny due to their influential positions, making them susceptible to allegations of corruption. In several instances, PEPs have been wrongfully accused and, despite subsequent exoneration, have suffered significant reputational damage due to smear campaigns. Here are five notable cases from different countries:

Former President John Dramani Mahama was implicated in a bribery scandal involving Airbus SE, with allegations suggesting his involvement through his brother, Samuel Adam Mahama. These claims, lacking substantial evidence, were perceived as politically motivated to tarnish Mahama’s reputation and divert attention from governmental shortcomings. The Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) eventually exonerated Mahama, but the smear campaign had already inflicted damage on his public image.

Adolphus Wabara, former President of the Nigerian Senate, faced allegations in 2005 of accepting a ₦55 million bribe to influence budget approvals. Despite his resignation and a prolonged 14-year legal battle, Wabara was acquitted in 2019 due to insufficient evidence.

Frederick Chiluba, Zambia’s second President, faced allegations of embezzling public funds after his tenure ended in 2002. Following a protracted legal process, Chiluba was acquitted of all charges in 2009. The court determined that the prosecution failed to provide compelling evidence linking him to the alleged crimes. This verdict underscored the challenges in distinguishing between political vendettas and genuine anti-corruption efforts.

Georgia Thompson, a Wisconsin state employee, was convicted in 2006 on federal corruption charges, accused of steering a state contract for political reasons. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned her conviction in 2007, citing a lack of evidence.

Former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia was accused of misusing funds related to the Zia Charitable Trust, leading to her conviction and imprisonment in 2018. In November 2024, the Supreme Court of Bangladesh acquitted Zia and all co-accused, citing a lack of credible evidence.

Nabil Sayadi, director of the European branch of the Global Relief Foundation, was accused of transferring funds to an Al-Qaeda financier, leading to his inclusion on international watch-lists and the freezing of his assets. In 2006, Belgian judges exonerated Sayadi, citing a lack of evidence linking him to terrorist activities.

These cases highlight the profound impact that unfounded corruption allegations and smear campaigns can have on PEPs, often resulting in lasting reputational harm even after legal exoneration.While many accusations are substantiated, there are notable instances where PEPs have been wrongfully accused and subsequently exonerated by the legal system.

Chief Dan Etete’s experience, like the ones already referenced, serves as a stark reminder of the potential for justice systems to be weaponized. It calls for introspection and reform to safeguard the principles of fairness and equity, ensuring that individuals are protected from undue legal persecutions driven by interests that have little to do with justice. This underscores the necessity for robust legal frameworks that ensure due process, protect individuals from politically motivated accusations, and uphold the integrity of judicial systems worldwide.

*** Jeremiah Perekeme Owoupele is a Niger Delta based lawyer.

Continue Reading

Society

Portable now in our custody – Ogun Police

Published

on

By

 

The Ogun State Police Command says Habeeb Okikiola, aka Portable, is now in its custody.

 

Omolola Odutola, the state public relations officer made the disclosure in a statement on Wednesday.

 

According to her, “The Ogun State Police Command wishes to inform the public that Habeeb Okikiola, also known as Portable, arrived at the State Criminal Investigation Department, Eleweran, Abeokuta, at exactly 13:23 hours today, February 19, 2025.

 

 

“His presence at the SCID is connected to an ongoing investigation. The command assures the public that due process will be followed in handling this matter, and updates will be provided as necessary.”

 

Portable was declared wanted for assault on some officials of the Ogun State Town Planning Agency who were carrying out enforcement on his property in the Ilogbo area of the state.

 

Details later…

Continue Reading

Trending