Connect with us

Interview

We Want Bakassi Issue Revisited…. Sen. Florence Ita-Giwa

Published

on

 

Why are you still here talking about Bakassi when it is no longer a part of Nigeria?

Why won’t I talk about Bakassi? Bakassi is still in the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria. So, why won’t I talk about it? You should realise that the action of ceding Bakassi to Cameroon was not backed by any referendum asking the people where they want to belong. It was a unilateral action and that is why we are asking that the matter be readdressed. There is no legislative approval for Bakassi to be moved out of Nigeria. However, my own position is that I am saving time because I am talking about reality. I am talking about the lives of the people. As we speak, there are thousands of Bakassi people living in refugee camps somewhere in Akpabuyo. They are all exposed to harsh weather conditions of the raining season. They have on their own, offered to come back to the country but they still live as refugees. If you read the Green Tree Agreement very well –I can make copies available. It says you may stay in Cameroon or you may stay in Nigeria. It does not say you are no longer Nigerian neither does it say you must change your citizenship. The agreement allows the people to say where they want to stay. And it further says that if you chose to stay in Cameroon, the administration must allow you live your life in accordance with your culture and traditions. Meanwhile, an area has been allocated where they can resettle but it is not yet developed. We are asking that the area be developed so the people can live meaningful lives. We don’t want to be in Cameroon. We want to be in Nigeria. I want to live in Nigeria but all I ask is that the area be developed to help us resettle. So, basically, we are asking for two things: resettlement and compensation.

What sort of compensation?

Compensation to individuals for loss of landmass to the state and compensation for loss of individual property to the state; compensation for the inconvenience caused the people, for their rights that were violated, compensation for all the major things we left behind there. That is what we are asking for.

Can you put this is naira terms?

We are working on the figures.

You said Bakassi is still in Nigeria’s Constitution but the Nigerian government ceded it to Cameroon. Don’t you see a contradiction here?

Yes, Bakassi is still recognised by the Nigerian Constitution. The Nigerian government ceded Bakassi to Cameroon as a geographical expression, as land. Even that ceding was done without reference to the legislature. Procedurally, you must get legislative approval if you want to cede any land in Nigeria.

How come till this moment there has not been legislative action to ratify or challenge the ceding?

I believe that those who represent Cross River State at the National Assembly have been talking about it, but you know how Nigeria is. You talk and talk and make recommendations but the recommendations never see the light of day. But there is work currently ongoing. There was a committee that was set up recently after much agitation from my people and me. The committee has been there and they looked at the area, gathered information and looked at options available. The committee has been working. We are waiting for the outcome of that committee.

What you said now highlights the problem most delegates have raised at the conference and that is the issue of unjust demarcation of boundaries and alienation of people from their homelands. How do you feel being part of a government that did this?

Well, it is most unfortunate but you should know that most of these actions were not deliberate but done out of carelessness. Just out of carelessness.

Are you suggesting that the administration then was careless to have allowed that happen?

You have to be careful about such use of words. If a president wants to cede an area, and wants to abide by the rules of the land, or the laws of the land, I believe that he would have also referred the matter to the National Assembly. Not forgetting the fact that the president subjected himself to that jurisdiction and once you subject yourself to the jurisdiction of the court, you are obliged to respect and implement whatever is the outcome of the court process. However, before obliging, that matter would have been settled in the National Assembly.

You sit in the conference with the Attorney General who handed over the instrument of ceding to Cameroon. Have you interacted with him on what actually transpired?

I have been handling issues and Nigeria is supposed to come up and back the people of Bakassi to make sure they are resettled. The unfortunate thing about it was that we subjected ourselves to the jurisdiction of the court and once we did that, we were obliged to abide by the outcome. Mind you that (Gen. Sani) Abacha was taken to court and he refused to subject himself to the jurisdiction of the court. Rather, he went to fight. He fought up to a point before he stopped. I do not know where we would have been today were he to be alive. He gave us the local government. Now, when democracy set in, I think we wanted to portray the image of a democratic nation which is willing to go with the world and abide by the tenets of democracy.

In other words, the Bakassi people are pained that Nigeria has not gotten leader with the character of an Abacha?

I am not saying that neither am I denying that we will continue to celebrate him because he gave us the local government.

Are you satisfied with the way things have developed so far at the conference?

Very much satisfied! This is a very well organised conference and people are talking. On the first day we came here, I asked if they will grant every delegate an opportunity to speak even if for five minutes. I am happy that is happening and people are pouring out their hearts. Added to that, the committee of 50, which I am part of, helped doused a flame and stopped anything that would have caused turbulence in the conference.

It is being said that some of you in that committee have gone ahead to form another group?

I don’t know of any other group. But at conferences like this, it is not out of place to from groups. There are many groups of which I am member of some. There is no formal group of the 50 but there are many groups which happen at conferences. It is necessary for you to sit down as a group, devoid of ethnicity and religion, to discuss. It happens all the time.

It is being said the group is to push for Jonathan…?

I don’t know about that. I did not come here for Jonathan. I came here for Bakassi people. I think it is very unfortunate the way people talk. It is very unfair and they should not bring down the integrity of such a great conference, such a gathering of great people. However, I don’t owe any Nigerian any explanation but I have not been invited by anybody to discuss Jonathan. As a PDP member, if I think Jonathan has done well and deserves a second term, I will join his campaign and campaign for him. Not in this conference.

Are you happy with the bickering, by delegates, over food?

That is why I am canvassing for executive session. It is actually out of place for delegates of this calibre to be discussing about food. This is the sort of things you bring up in executive sessions not at plenary. However, there is nothing wrong with people complaining but this food thing should not really be an issue.

But the other day you were seen urging some aggrieved delegates to join you to town for lunch?

That is invasion of my privacy. I am a mother and I am very finicky about food. So, if I have my own food, I can invite my friends to eat with me. I do that all the time. It is not because the food is not good. Meanwhile, I don’t mind when the food is not good because I am forever on a diet. Don’t you want to be like me?

Culled: The Union

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Interview

Show Us Your Supporters: Lovers of Lagos Challenges Obasa

Published

on

By

 

Tension continues to rise in the Lagos State political arena as the impeached Speaker of the House of Assembly, Honourable Mudashiru Obasa, insists that his removal was invalid. Obasa, who returned to Lagos on Saturday after a foreign trip, has declared that the impeachment carried out by the Assembly using what he described as a “fake” mace cannot stand.

 

Speaking to supporters at his former official lodge in Ikeja, Lagos, Obasa dismissed the allegations against him, maintaining that he remains the Speaker of the House until what he called the “right process” is followed. However, his claims have sparked widespread skepticism and criticism, with many questioning the validity of his support base.

 

“All members of the House are aligned with the new Speaker, Rt. Hon. Mojisola Lasbat Meranda, so who exactly are Obasa’s supporters?” asked Lovers of Lagos, a pro-democracy advocacy group. “The former Speaker must tell us who is truly standing by him, as the Assembly has moved forward under its new leadership.”

 

Obasa’s Claims and Rebuttals

 

In his address, Obasa attempted to debunk the allegations of financial impropriety leveled against him. “Is it possible to construct an ordinary gate with N16 billion? It is not the wall of Jericho or the wall that demarcated the United States of America and Mexico,” he said, mocking claims of financial mismanagement.

 

He further refuted accusations of overspending on vehicles and events. “How can they say we bought one Hilux bus for N1 billion each and 40 pieces for N40 billion? Talking about Thanksgiving, they should compare the one they said we spent N200 million on and the one organized by the state government.”

 

Despite his attempts to clear his name, observers note that Obasa failed to provide any proof of his claims or explain his controversial leadership style. Critics also highlighted that the allegations were endorsed by 32 lawmakers who signed his impeachment notice—a majority that reflects broad discontent with his tenure.

 

Questions About His Support

 

Obasa’s insistence that he remains the rightful Speaker has drawn sharp criticism. Members of the Assembly and political groups have dismissed his claims as baseless, pointing out that the new leadership enjoys overwhelming support.

 

“All members of the Lagos State House of Assembly stand firmly with Rt. Hon. Mojisola Lasbat Meranda. Obasa should tell us who his supporters are because the Assembly has spoken, and the era of impunity is over,” a prominent lawmaker said anonymously.

 

Police Involvement and Allegations

 

Obasa also alleged that the Lagos State Commissioner of Police led a team of officers to invade the Assembly on the day of his impeachment. According to him, over 200 policemen also surrounded his private residence in Agege, blocking the entrance and preventing his family from leaving.

 

However, political analysts have criticized Obasa for what they describe as an attempt to play the victim while avoiding accountability for the allegations against him. “He’s trying to distract Lagosians from the real issues. The allegations against him are serious, and he has yet to adequately address them,” said a Lagos-based political analyst.

 

A Divided Legacy

 

Obasa, who has served as a lawmaker since 2003 and is the longest-serving member of the House, claimed that his removal was politically motivated and orchestrated during his absence. He further alleged interference in the Assembly’s affairs, stating that due process was not followed in his impeachment.

 

However, his critics argue that his leadership style and alleged authoritarianism had alienated many of his colleagues, culminating in his removal. The Assembly, under the leadership of Speaker Meranda, has vowed to uphold transparency and accountability, signaling a new era in Lagos politics.

 

As Lagosians await the resolution of the crisis, one question remains unanswered: who are Obasa’s supporters, and can they rally enough influence to back his claims? Until then, the former Speaker’s declarations appear to be a lone cry in the face of overwhelming opposition.

Continue Reading

Interview

How Marasoft Pay paid salaries with suspected fraudulent funds, trigerring account freezes and employee anguish

Published

on

By

In October 2024, employees at Marasoft Pay, a Nigerian fintech founded by Emmanuel Marakwe-Ogu, experienced what seemed like a long-awaited resolution: payment of two months of overdue salaries. But their relief was short-lived.

Within days of receiving their payments, employees were stunned to discover that their accounts—along with the accounts of those they had sent money to—were frozen. The funds, they learned, had been traced to a suspected fraudulent source, according to six former employees who spoke with TechCabal on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.

Marasoft Pay, which operates in Kenya and Nigeria, allows businesses and individuals to collect payments via its platform. However, because it does not hold local licenses in Kenya, it processes transactions through a Flutterwave wallet which it has used since 2022. Kenyan court documents showed that Marasoft was one of the fintechs that deposited over $55 million into Flutterwave in 2022.

“Marasoft Pay is not a partner of Flutterwave but a customer. It was a business that processed payments through Flutterwave,” Flutterwave told TechCabal. Smaller fintechs typically process payments through licensed fintechs, as banks do not onboard unlicensed fintechs.

The series of unfortunate events began on October 16, 2024, when a glitch allowed Marasoft access to more funds than it had in the wallet, enabling the company to withdraw over ₦84 million ($54,000). According to transaction records seen by TechCabal, CEO Marakwe-Ogu initiated 102 withdrawals from his Marasoft account within 12 hours, each linked to his phone number and bank verification number (BVN).

The timing of the glitch could not have been more fortuitous: it came a week after employees stopped working due to growing frustration over unpaid salaries. While the company paused operations on October 10, it continued to process transactions.

Between October 16 and 17, Marakwe-Ogu paid ₦35 million in overdue salaries directly from the Flutterwave wallet. In a WhatsApp chat with employees seen by TechCabal, Marakwe-Ogu admitted to using his company account to pay salaries after employees noticed that the payments did not come from the human resources account.

Employees were right to be worried. Days after receiving salary payments, their accounts were frozen, and over 40 workers began a legal battle to unfreeze their funds.

“Unfortunately, we are unable to lift the PND (post no debit) on the account at this time. The funds deposited into your account have been traced to a fraudulent merchant, and investigations are currently ongoing,” read an email from a senior customer experience associate at Flutterwave to a former Marasoft employee.

After paying employees from the Flutterwave wallet, Marakwe-Ogu transferred ₦49 million to various accounts through payment processors like Transact Pay, a European fintech that generates virtual accounts, to a VFD Bank account he controlled, complicating retrieval efforts, according to account statements seen by TechCabal.

A week later, on October 24, TransactPay sent a recall request for ten transactions worth ₦19.3 million, copying former Marasoft employees. By then, several Marasoft employees’ accounts were frozen, and many were left scrambling for answers.

While Marakwe-Ogu continued to tell employees that the restrictions were a mistake and would be lifted, he agreed to a five-month repayment plan with Flutterwave expiring in February 2025, a former employee with direct knowledge of the matter said. Flutterwave declined to comment on the repayment plan, citing confidentiality.

“It went from a situation where we thought the salary payment was a temporary issue to one where it was clear this was deliberate,” said one former senior employee who asked not to be named discussing an ongoing issue.

Marakwe-Ogu also requested a recall of the salaries through the Nigerian Inter-Bank Settlement Scheme (NIBSS) using Marasoft, an email seen by TechCabal showed. By November, it became clear that the situation was worsening, and employees began resigning. As the employees pushed for answers, he removed them from the company’s WhatsApp group and stopped taking their calls, complicating their efforts to get the restrictions lifted.

“People believed in the company’s mission and endured two months of delayed payments. But this time, it became clear that it wasn’t just a minor issue—it was deliberate,” a former senior employee who asked not to be named for fear of reprisals told TechCabal.

The fallout from the incident has been painful. One employee, whose account was blocked, was forced to borrow money from her father to refund her co-contributors in an esusu after her funds were frozen.

“I was left in a very difficult situation. It was stressful for both my father and me,” she told TechCabal, asking not to be named so she could speak freely.

Marasoft resumed operations in January and at least eight employees have returned to the fintech despite the frozen accounts and owed salaries.

Marakwe-Ogu did not respond to requests for comments.

 

Source: Tech Cabal

Continue Reading

Interview

‘Good material on telecoms’ – Obasanjo commends book by ex-Punch editor Dayo Oketola

Published

on

By

Former President Olusegun Obasanjo has described ‘The Catalyst: Nigerian Tech Evolution through a Journalist’s Lens,’ authored by the immediate past Editor of The PUNCH, Mr Dayo Oketola, as an essential educational resource material.

Speaking during a courtesy visit by the author to his Olusegun Obasanjo Presidential Library residence in Oke Mosan, Abeokuta, the former President praised the book as a comprehensive contribution to the body of knowledge in the Nigerian tech ecosystem.

Obasanjo unveiled the book on September 17, 2024, during an exaugural lecture in honour of Oketola following his successful run as Editor of PUNCH Weekend Titles and later Editor of The PUNCH.

He said, “I have started reading your book; it’s good. It’s a comprehensive resource on telecoms. It details some of our achievements in the telecoms sector. It is a good reference material for all. You have done well, and I must commend your efforts.”

He prayed for the author and endorsed the book saying it’s a must-have for readers, researchers and followers of the nation’s enduring telecoms trajectory. He also encouraged him to write more books.

Obasanjo recalled how his administration generated over $280 million from GSM licences that would have been given away for $3 million by his predecessor.

He also revealed how much he wanted Vodafone, a British telecoms giant, to participate in the licence auction, hoping the company could join others in opening up the nation’s telecoms market.

The former President further revealed how he approached Tony Blair, a former United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, to encourage Vodafone to foray into the Nigerian market.

However, he commended MTN, Econet (now Airtel), Glo, and later Etisalat (now 9mobile) for making the investments while others were dragging their feet.

“MTN, Econet, and Glo paid over $280 million while Etisalat, which came later, paid $450 million. That was one of the very profitable government businesses that we did,” Obasanjo said.

Obasanjo described Nigeria as a good country and wished the citizens peace in 2025.

Oketola, on November 15 kick-started the ‘Catalyst Book Tour, an international book tour, beginning in Abuja and continuing in Lagos, Akwa-Ibom, Delta, as well as the UK, US, and Canada, among other locations.

“The international ‘Catalyst Book Tour’ will include readings, book signings, fireside chats, and interviews, serving as a platform to share insights from my 20 years in journalism while celebrating my contributions to the telecom industry’s knowledge base. It will also provide a chance to connect with friends, colleagues, critics, and fellow book lovers, both locally and internationally,” he said.

The book is available at Rovenheights Books nationwide.

Continue Reading

Trending