Connect with us

News and Report

Why is Yemi Cardoso so focused on the MPR? – Toni Kan

Published

on

 

Yemi Cardoso, Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria was guest of the Harvard Club of Nigeria in Lagos on Friday October 4th, 2024.

In speaking to the topic – “Leadership in Challenging Times: Restoring Credibility, Building Trust, and Containing Inflation”, he referenced the raising of the MPR from 18.45% in February 2024 a few months after he assumed office to the current level of 27.25% on September 24th, 2024.

According to him , he told his audience that “Our decision to raise the Monetary Policy Rate (MPR) to 27.25% was a bold move. Higher interest rates, while painful for borrowers, are necessary to curb excess money in circulation and control inflation. Leadership is about making hard choices to secure long-term stability over short-term comfort in moments like these.”

Reading that portion of the report from his interaction with the Harvard Club of Nigeria Yemi Cardoso’s comments about the MPR, interest rates and inflation took me many years back to when I was a Deputy Manager in the Research and Economic Intelligence Department of Zenith Bank.

In that role, the bulk of my work was routine; stock and money market monitoring and analysis as well as analysis of foreign exchange transactions and trends.

But aside from data collection and trend analysis I did some writing; producing the Zenith Economic Quarterly and analyzing feasibility studies for new businesses. It was from analyzing feasibility studies that I gained some unique insights about setting up a business and the disposition of Nigerian entrepreneurs to banks and the loans they obtain from banks. It was there I learnt about interest rates and Nigerian businesses. But I will come to that shortly.

Back then at Zenith, I recall that when I started compiling money market reports, the reference for interest rates was something called the Minimum Rediscount Rate (MRR). It was replaced on December 4, 2006 with the now popular Monetary Policy Rate (MPR).

CBN notedThe at that time that “The MPR would be the main instrument of the new monetary policy framework and will determine the lower and upper band of the CBN standing facility and is expected to have the capability of acting as the nominal anchor for other rates.” That lower and upper band is what we now know as the asymmetric corridors.

The MPR is thereforea benchmark that determines the interest rate at which banks lend to their customers. Raising or lowering the MPR also has an effect on inflation by controlling the amount of money in circulation. This is why Yemi Cardoso has made it a key aspect of his inflation control agenda.

Since taking office, the incumbent CBN governor has raised the MPR 5 times.

294th Monetary Policy Committee Press BriefingThese increases have been anchored on what he described at the as underscoring “the CBN’s commitment to the price stability mandate and the need to urgently bring inflation under control to ensure that the purchasing power of ordinary Nigerians is restored in the short to medium term.”

With each raise, financial analysts and commentators have expressed their opinions. While varied, the common denominator has been the fact that a high interest rate which is correlated with a high MPR will impact the borrowing costs for businesses and individuals.

The point has also been made that the negative impact on borrowing for investment and consumption purposes could slow down economic activitybut what they do not say as loudly is that a high MPR rate means that those who put their money in savings deposits or TBs will get more bang for their buck and even foreign investors would be attracted by higher rates of return.

Basic economics tells us that inflation occurs when a few things happen, top of which is rising prices and too much money chasing too few goods. Others include, a rise in the cost of producing goods and services, demand exceeding supply, wages rising leading to increased purchasing power, natural disasters impacting farming or production, conflicts disrupting supply lines or when tax cuts lead to higher purchasing power.

Almost all of these have happened since 2023 and led to an increase in headline inflation something Cardoso also noted at that MPC briefing. In his words “members note the continued rise in headline inflation driven largely by food prices because of supply shortages and high cost of logistics and distribution.”

The last bit was, of course, a euphemism for high transport costs exacerbated by the increase in the fuel price.

So, curbing borrowing which leads to more money in circulation is clearly a step in the right direction.

While it is true that a high interest rate will discourage borrowing and potentially impact productive activities, the point should also be stressed that all over the world, the interest rate and inflation rate are connected because central bankers realize that the interest rate should usually be higher than the rate of inflation if prices are to stay stable which is what Yemi Cardoso is trying to do – keep prices stable and low and restore the purchasing power of ordinary Nigerians who are the most impacted.

StatistaA quick look at statistics from will show us a trend for inflation vs interest rates for a few countries as at July 2024:

Australia, inflation rate of 3.5% and interest rate of 4.35%

Brazil: inflation rate of 4.5% and interest rate of 9.5%

Canada: inflation rate of 2.5% and interest rate of 4.5%

Russia: inflation rate of 9.1% and interest rate of 16%

UK: inflation rate of 2.2% and interest rate of 5.25%

US: inflation rate of 2.9% and interest rate of 5.38%

Now, if central banks the world over have realised that interest rates must be higher than the inflation rate why do we scream blue murder each time the MPC raises the MPR?

The answer I believe is because we are looking at high double digits. Back in the mid noughties when I worked at Zenith bank interest rates were around 12 and 13% and I remember that fixed deposits used to attract less than 10% returns. So, if the MPR had been moved by 200 basis points from 12.75 to 14.75% there would be not so much hoopla.

MPC Meeting of February 14, 2006To underline this point, let us go back to 2006. Resolutions from the included: “Resolved to work towards maintaining single digit (core) inflation… MRR will be maintained at 13% in line with the anti-inflation stance of the MPC.” This shows that the resort to MRR or MPR as an inflation monitoring tool is historic and pre-dated Cardoso and his team who have set an inflation target of 21.4% in the short term.

Another point that needs to be made is that if interest rates remain lower than the rate of inflation in an inflationary environment such as we have presently, it could be an invitation to financial rascality where loans are obtained and used for what they were not intended for.

And that point leads me back to my days as a researcher at Zenith bank. Back then, in analyzing and providing opinions on feasibility studies, I was often mystified when I read the financials presented by start-ups seeking loans. A service oriented business would, for instance, apply for N60m take off loan and present line items for its sunk costs showing – business registration, legal, rent, office equipment, salaries and wages etc. But then you would often discover that N25m had been allotted to be used for “buying cars for marketing.”

My boss back then always told me that such depreciating assets must never be allotted more than 20%!

The issue was that in those days, with interest rate at about 10%, the temptation to be imprudent was high. This is what Yemi Cardoso is fighting to stop in an era of high inflation. Whatever is borrowed now must be applied judiciously to productive activity.

So, do we expect the MPR to go higher? My view is that it should. The MPR must correlate in some particular with the rate of inflation and as the CBN governor noted at that Harvard Club event “in the face of economic challenges, it is imperative to focus on core objectives—restoring the credibility of the institution, building trust in the financial system, and, most critically, containing inflation. These are not just strategic goals; they are foundational to any meaningful recovery.”

previous Intervention in concluding, I must return to a submission I made in a ; for the economy to grow and the gains become apparent in the medium to long term, there must be a convergence of both monetary and fiscal policies? Monetary policy is not a silver bullet even though it seems to be working with headline inflation dropping and the gap between the official and parallel markets contracting. Interesting days lie ahead.

 

 

**Toni Kan is a PR expert and financial analyst.

News and Report

Absence Of Oba Otudeko, Bisi Onasanya, Others Stalls Arraignment Over N12.3Billion Fraud As Otudeko’s Lawyer Protests In Court

Published

on

By

The counsel for Oba Otudeko, Chairman of Honeywell Group, who is facing charges of a N12.3 billion fraud, appeared before a Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday to protest the charge.

Mr. Bode Olanipekun (SAN) informed the court that he was protesting because the charge had not been served on Otudeko or the two other individuals charged alongside him, the News Agency of Nigeria reports.

Olanipekun informed the court that, despite not being served with the charge, the defendants were shocked to learn about the planned arraignment through the media when the story broke last Thursday.

The 13-count charge was filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) against Oba Otudeko, former Managing Director of FirstBank Plc. Olabisi Onasanya, and former Honeywell board member Soji Akintayo.

Olanipekun is the counsel for the three defendants.

They were charged alongside the company, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

 

The EFCC alleges that the defendants obtained the sum under false pretenses.

 

According to the EFCC, the four committed the fraud in tranches of N5.2billion, N6.2billion, N6.150billion, N1.5billion and N500million, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos.

 

The 13-count charge, filed by EFCC counsel, Bilikisu Buhari, on January 16, 2025, further claimed that the defendants used forged documents to deceive the bank.

Specifically, count 1 accused the defendants of conspiring “to obtain the sum of N12.3Billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V-TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED and Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In Count 2, it was alleged that the defendants, on or about 26th day of November, 2013 in Lagos, “obtained the sum of N5.2 billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for by V TECH DYNAMIC LINKS LIMITED which representation you know to be false.”

 

The 3rd count alleged that the defendants, between 2013 and 2014 in Lagos, obtained N6.2billion from First Bank Limited on the pretence that the said sum represented credit facilities applied for and disbursed to Stallion Nigeria Limited, which representation you know to be false.”

 

In the 4th count, they were accused of conspiring to spend the N6.15billion, out of the monies.

According to the Commission, the offences contravened Section 8(a) of Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act 2006 and was punishable under Section 1(3) of the same Act.

Counts 5 reads: “That you, Chief Oba Otudeko, Stephen Olabisi Onasanya, Soji Akintayo and Anchorage Leisure Limited on or about 11th day of December, 2013 in Lagos, procured Honeywell Flour Mills Plc to retain the sum of N1.5 billion, which sum you reasonably ought to have known forms part of proceeds of your unlawful activities to wit: Obtaining by False Pretense and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(c), 15 (2) (d) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended) and punishable under Section 15(3) of the same Act.”

Meanwhile, Otudeko had reportedly fled Nigeria ahead of his scheduled arraignment on fraud charges.

 

According to TheCable Newspaper, Otudeko’s exit from the country is linked to the mounting legal pressures and financial disputes he is facing.

The newspaper reported that the businessman left the country via one of the land borders.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Loan controversy: Bisi Onasanya’s lawyer condemns media trial….Judge adjourns case to February 13

Published

on

By

In line with his resolve to defend himself and clear his name, Dr. Bisi Onasanya through his lawyer, Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, SAN, at a session at the Federal High Court Lagos on Monday, January 20, 2025, demanded the service of proof of evidence and summons.

Onasanya, a chartered accountant and a former Group Managing Director of First Bank is defending himself against a controversial loan that allegedly occurred at First Bank 12 years ago. The retired banker is refuting the allegations alongside three others namely former Chairman of the bank, Chief Oba Otudeko, a former board member of Honeywell, Soji Akintayo, and a firm, Anchorage Leisure Ltd.

At a hearing at the Federal High Court in Lagos on Monday, Fusika condemned the media trial his client had been subjected to, saying he was not formally invited by the EFCC or served a notice of the charge.

He expressed surprise at seeing news stories in major newspapers linking Dr Onasanya to a trial on loan controversy during his time as First Bank Group Managing Director without prior notification.

“My Lord, it is concerning that my client has been unduly exposed to media trial without being formally served. This is a procedural anomaly that undermines his right to a fair hearing and personal dignity,” Olumide-Fusika said.

The prosecuting counsel, Rotimi Oyedepo, denied any involvement by the EFCC in the media coverage of the case.

He stated that the commission had not issued a press statement and suggested that journalists may have obtained information through other means.

“My Lord, we disassociate ourselves from any media reports,” Oyedepo said.

The EFCC also applied for an ex parte motion to issue a bench warrant for the defenders’ arrest and sought permission to serve them through substituted means, alleging they had evaded service.

Olumide-Fusika opposed the motion, arguing that his client had always been available and had not evaded service. Demonstrating his determination to clear his name, the senior lawyer prayed to the court to have the EFCC serve the charge and the proof of evidence in the open court.

“This application is unwarranted and speculative. My client has neither avoided service nor absented himself from this matter. The claims of the prosecution are baseless. Since I am here and my client is ready to go ahead with this case, I ask to be served the charge and the proof of evidence here in the court,” Olumide-Fusika argued.

Justice Chukwujekwu Aneke, who presided over the case, dismissed the EFCC’s motion for substituted service on Onasanya since he has accepted to be served in the open court.

The judge consequently ordered that the EFCC serve Olumide-Fusika the charge and proof of evidence in open court.

The EFCC complied with the directive, and Olumide-Fusika who confirmed the receipt of the document extracted a confirmation from the prosecution counsel that the proof of evidence submitted is exhaustive and there wouldn’t be an addendum. The defence counsel said EFCC’s confirmation should be on record, insisting that his client was ready to defend himself and clear his name.

Justice Aneke adjourned the case to February 13, 2025.

It will be recalled that Onasanya, through his Communication Advisor, Mr Michael Osunnuyi, had earlier dismissed allegations, describing the claims as baseless and an attempt to tarnish Onasanya’s stellar reputation for professionalism, integrity and humaneness.

Continue Reading

News and Report

Abuja-Lagos Super Highway Project faces threat as two consortiums engage in battle for FG’s nod

Published

on

By

AEC Unity Network Limited, the officially recognised concessionaire for the Abuja-Lagos Super Highway and High-Speed Train projects, has denied any association with an entity known as AEC-Geofocus Consortium (Geofocus).

AEC Unity Network clarified that Geofocus has no role in the planning, financing, construction, or operation of the 470-kilometer superhighway and high-speed rail projects, which are part of President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope agenda to boost national infrastructure.

In a statement released on Sunday, the company emphasised that it is the sole concessionaire authorized by the Federal Government of Nigeria, having received approvals from the Federal Ministry of Works, the Federal Ministry of Finance, and the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC).

Barrister Ayodeji Ademola, legal consultant for AEC Unity Network, said in the statement that AEC-Geofocus has no basis whatsoever to make any claim in relation to the Super Highway project, having not been part of its conception from the onset.

In the statement, AEC Unity Network reaffirmed that it is the sole concessionaire authorised by the Federal Government of Nigeria to design, finance, construct, operate, and maintain the 470-kilometer superhighway and high-speed rail linking Abuja and Lagos.

According to the statement, the company’s approvals are from the Federal Ministry of Works, the Federal Ministry of Finance, and the Infrastructure Concession Regulatory Commission (ICRC).

The reaction by the AEC Unity Network may have been informed by media publications credited to one Engineer Mutiu Yinka Idris, who asserted that AEC-Geofocus was in charge of the project for the federal government.

Idris, who claimed to be Director of Operations for AEC-Geofocus, had in the publication described the company as a consortium of engineers, planners, and investors that had successfully attracted $16 billion from Middle Eastern investors, with additional interest from European financial institutions and the World Bank.

He had also claimed that the financial framework was designed to minimize government expenditure, safeguard public funds, and prevent cost overruns through an efficient risk-sharing mechanism.

Idris had assured stakeholders of a grand project flag-off before February 2025, reiterating AEC-Geofocus’ commitment to delivering world-class infrastructure.

“The $16 billion project will be led by AEC-Geofocus, a consortium of engineers, planners, and investors, and plans have been concluded to commence it by February this year, 2025,” Idris had asserted.

He said that the Lagos-Abuja corridor, spanning approximately 500 kilometers, will connect Lagos, Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Kwara, Kogi, and Niger states before reaching Abuja, under a design, Build, Finance, Operate, and Maintain (DBFOM) model.

But in its sharp reaction, AEC Unity Network expressed surprise at the emergence of AEC-Geofocus out of the blue to make claims on a project it was never part of.

Part of the statement read: “We emphatically state that AEC Unity Network Limited has no relationship whatsoever with AEC-Geofocus Consortium or Geofocus. Any claims made by Geofocus regarding involvement in the projects are ‘spurious and false.’”

“We categorically state that AEC Unity Network Limited has no relationship whatsoever with Engineer Mutiu Yinka Idris or Geofocus.”

“These fraudulent claims are completely at variance with our proposed infrastructure plans and are intended to confuse and defraud unsuspecting stakeholders,” the statement added.

The statement by Engineer Mutiu Yinka Idris, who claimed involvement in the projects on behalf of Geofocus in several media outlets and amplified on social media, is baseless and an attempt to mislead the public.

The company warned investors and the public to disregard any media advertisements or reports from Geofocus, describing them as unauthorized and misleading.

AEC Unity Network stated that its project is still in the planning stages, with no concurrent developments on the same corridor by any other entity.

To prevent confusion and potential fraud, AEC Unity Network urged local and foreign investors to verify information only through its official channels and avoid engaging with Geofocus on matters relating to the Abuja-Lagos Super Highway and High-Speed Train projects.

This infrastructure initiative, which includes a direct expressway and rail connection between Abuja and Lagos, is expected to enhance transportation efficiency and foster economic growth.

AEC Unity Network reiterated its commitment to transparency and professionalism, urging the public to engage only through its official channels for accurate information about the projects.

Continue Reading

Trending